论文信息 - Comparing welfare-to-work programs

Comparing welfare-to-work programs

As welfare-to-work programs proliferate in 50 states, the need to determine which are effective, which not, becomes more urgent, and the task more daunting. The first two articles in this issue of Focus explore two different approaches to the use of existing survey and administrative data to compare the effects of programs in different states, revealing both the possibilities and the limits of these data. Comparing welfare-to-work programs 1 Income and program participation among early TANF recipients: The evidence from New Jersey, Washington, and Wisconsin 2 Successful welfare-to-work programs: Were Riverside and Portland really that good? 11

[1] B. Lee,et al. Child protective intervention in the context of welfare reform: The effects of work and welfare on maltreatment reports , 2003 .

[2] R. Moffitt,et al. Mothers' Transitions from Welfare to Work and the Well-Being of Preschoolers and Adolescents , 2003, Science.

[3] Robert M. Goerge,et al. Changes in Child Social Program Participation in the 1990s: Initial Findings from Illinois , 2000 .

[4] Barbara Needell,et al. Transitions from AFDC to child welfare in California , 1999 .

[5] Jeffrey D. Kubik. Incentives for the identification and treatment of children with disabilities: the supplemental security income program , 1999 .

[6] D. Fein,et al. The Impacts of Welfare Reform on Child Maltreatment in Delaware , 2003 .

[7] Victoria Russell,et al. Collaboration between State Welfare and Child Welfare Agencies , 2002 .

[8] R. Burkhauser,et al. Chapter 51 Economic analysis of transfer programs targeted on people with disabilities , 1999 .

[9] S. Glista. The service delivery continuum. , 1994, ASHA.