Impact of Small Variations in the Delivered Dose of Rabbit Antithymocyte Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation With Early Corticosteroid Withdrawal

Background Optimal dosing of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction therapy in kidney transplantation is not well defined. The impact of dosing from variations in dose rounding or single dose limits has not been studied. Methods This retrospective study of 242 adult renal transplant recipients receiving rATG induction and steroid-sparing maintenance therapy evaluates the effect of small changes in rATG induction dosing. The local protocol calls for four doses of rATG 1.5 mg/kg, approximated to the nearest 25 mg and limited to a max of 150 mg. Patients were stratified by total rATG dose received 5 to 6 mg/kg (n=151) and 6 mg/kg (n=91) or more. Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and allograft function were examined. Results Baseline and transplantation characteristics were similar between groups except for differences in mean weight (SD) (81 [17.3] vs. 76.3 [15.6]) and cumulative rATG dose received (451.8 [96.2] vs. 481.1 [93]) for patients in the 5- to 6-mg/kg group and 6-mg/kg or more group, respectively. Patients who received more rATG showed a significantly lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at last follow-up 11% (32/151) vs. 21.2% (10/91) among those who received only 5 to 6 mg/kg (P<0.042). Renal function (mean serum creatinine level) was similar at both 90 days and time of last follow-up. Safety review of leukopenia or thrombocytopenia did not differ. Conclusion Small changes in total rATG induction administered seem to significantly impact the incidence of rejection. Adequate rATG dosing is associated with improved rejection-free graft survival and should be achieved for all patients; doses should be rounded up when appropriate or additional doses should be administered if necessary.

[1]  D. Brennan,et al.  Thymoglobulin Induction Dosing Strategies in a Low-Risk Kidney Transplant Population: Three or Four Days? , 2010, Journal of transplantation.

[2]  K. Flegal,et al.  Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. , 2010, JAMA.

[3]  R. Marcén,et al.  Immunosuppressive Drugs in Kidney Transplantation , 2009, Drugs.

[4]  C. Drachenberg,et al.  Thymoglobulin Dose Optimization for Induction Therapy in High Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients , 2008, Transplantation.

[5]  T. Mueller Mechanisms of Action of Thymoglobulin , 2007 .

[6]  A. Kirk Induction Immunosuppression , 2006, Transplantation.

[7]  W. Winkelmayer,et al.  Comparison of two dosages of thymoglobulin used as a short‐course for induction in kidney transplantation , 2006, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[8]  K. Flegal,et al.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. , 2006, JAMA.

[9]  Ron Shapiro,et al.  Immunosuppression: evolution in practice and trends, 1993–2003 , 2005, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[10]  K. Flegal,et al.  Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. , 2002, JAMA.

[11]  E. Woodle,et al.  Safety, efficacy, and cost analysis of thymoglobulin induction therapy with intermittent dosing based on cd3+ lymphocyte counts in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients , 2002, Transplantation.

[12]  T. Howard,et al.  Short course induction immunosuppression with thymoglobulin for renal transplant recipients. , 2002, Transplantation.

[13]  O. Toupance,et al.  Immunoprophylaxis with Basiliximab Compared with Antithymocyte Globulin in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving MMF‐containing Triple Therapy , 2002, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[14]  J. Squifflet,et al.  INDUCTION VERSUS NONINDUCTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH TACROLIMUS-BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSION1 , 2001, Transplantation.

[15]  M. Schnitzler,et al.  A randomized, double-blinded comparison of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam for induction immunosuppressive therapy in adult renal transplant recipients. , 1999, Transplantation.

[16]  G. Appel,et al.  Use of ATG in treatment of steroid-resistant rejection. , 1980, Transplantation.