Determinants of Absorptive Capacity: Contrasting Manufacturing vs Services Enterprises

The purpose of this study is to explore the determinants and the consequent of absorptive capacity from the resource‐capability‐performance framework in the Taiwanese manufacturing and service industries. Structural equation modeling is applied to verify the conceptual model. In both of the Taiwanese manufacturing industry and the Taiwanese service industry, this study verifies that resource commitment and resource flexibility are two antecedents of absorptive capacity, and that new product development performance or service innovation performance is its consequent. Besides, the empirical results show that absorptive capacity plays a partial mediator in the manufacturing industry but a full mediator in the service industry. If companies would like to raise their new product development performance or service innovation performance, they have to enhance their resource commitment, resource flexibility, and absorptive capacity. Moreover, this study finds that the resource commitment of small and medium enterprises is significantly less than that of large enterprises in Taiwanese manufacturing industry. This study also finds that resource flexibility of established companies is significantly higher than that of younger companies in Taiwan.

[1]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[2]  Francisco Javier Lloréns Montes,et al.  Effects of Technology Absorptive Capacity and Technology Proactivity on Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Examination , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[3]  Daniel Olausson,et al.  Managing Uncertain, Complex Product Development in High-Tech Firms: In Search of Controlled Flexibility , 2010 .

[4]  P. Daugherty,et al.  The role of resource commitment and innovation in reverse logistics performance , 2005 .

[5]  Martin Heidenreich.  Innovation patterns and location of European low- and medium-technology industries , 2009 .

[6]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[7]  Lei-Yu Wu,et al.  Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's high-tech firms , 2007 .

[8]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Building a Strong Foothold in an Emerging Market: A Link between Resource Commitment and Environment Conditions , 2004 .

[9]  Nilesh Saraf,et al.  IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Exploring the Antecedents of Potential Absorptive Capacity and Its Impact on Innovation Performance , 2008 .

[11]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[12]  Luis M. Molina,et al.  Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity , 2011 .

[13]  S. Chien,et al.  Intellectual capital and new product sale performance of the financial services industry in Taiwan , 2011 .

[14]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[15]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  D. A. Horne,et al.  Services Innovation: Successful versus Unsuccessful Firms , 1993 .

[17]  U. Daellenbach,et al.  Commitment to Innovation: The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics , 1999 .

[18]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[19]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[20]  Eva Kirner,et al.  Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms--An empirical analysis of German industry , 2009 .

[21]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[22]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[23]  Ignacio Fernández-de-Lucio,et al.  Analyzing the Determinants of Firm's Absorptive Capacity: Beyond R&D , 2008 .

[24]  George P. Huber,et al.  The Decision-Making Paradigm of Organizational Design , 1986 .

[25]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[26]  A. Griffin.  PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[27]  Daniel Indarto Prajogo,et al.  The relationship between innovation and business performance—a comparative study between manufacturing and service firms , 2006 .

[28]  M. Verreynne,et al.  Multilevel absorptive capacity and interorganizational new product development: A process study , 2011 .

[29]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The relative importance of new product success determinants—perception versus reality , 1995 .

[30]  F. Tsai,et al.  Parent control mechanisms, knowledge attributes, knowledge acquisition and performance of IJVs in Taiwan service industries , 2011 .

[31]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[32]  Li Yuan,et al.  Can strategic flexibility help firms profit from product innovation , 2010 .

[33]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on New Product Development Performance – The Manufacturing Companies of Taiwan as an Example , 2006 .

[34]  C.-J. Chen,et al.  Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance: the mediating role of knowledge management capacity , 2009 .

[35]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[36]  W. Souder.  Managing relations between R&D and marketing in new product development projects☆ , 1988 .

[37]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[38]  Elisa Fredericks.  Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms: A contingency theory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications , 2005 .

[39]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Service versus Manufacturing Innovation , 2011 .

[40]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[41]  Bojan Angelov,et al.  Service Absorptive Capacity: Its Evolution and Implications for Innovation , 2010, PICMET 2010 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH.

[42]  Benjamin Hughes,et al.  Knowledge Arbitrage in Global Pharma: A Synthetic View of Absorptive Capacity and Open Innovation , 2010 .

[43]  F. Selnes,et al.  Promoting Relationship Learning , 2003 .

[44]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[45]  WeillPeter,et al.  IT Assets, Organizational Capabilities, and Firm Performance , 2007 .

[46]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploration of How Firms Renew Their Resource Base , 2009 .

[47]  G. Bruton,et al.  Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy , 2010 .

[48]  Abdelkader Daghfous,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and the Implementation of Knowledge-Intensive Best Practices , 2004 .

[49]  Masaaki Kotabe,et al.  Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China , 2011 .

[50]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[51]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets , 2009 .

[52]  J. S. Evans.  STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY FOR HIGH TECHNOLOGY MANOEUVRES: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 1991 .

[53]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Internationalization and the Dynamics of Product Adaptation—An Empirical Investigation , 2004 .

[54]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Patterns of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services , 2009 .

[55]  Chung-Jen Chen.  The Effects of Knowledge Attribute, Alliance Characteristics, and Absorptive Capacity on Knowledge Transfer Performance , 2004 .

[56]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[57]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A MULTIPLE-ITEM SCALE FOR MEASURING CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF SERVICE QUALITY , 1988 .

[58]  Dovev Lavie.  The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[59]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[60]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[61]  Josep Capó-Vicedo,et al.  New Product Development and Absorptive Capacity in Industrial Districts: A Multidimensional Approach , 2011 .

[62]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[63]  Paul Matthyssens,et al.  Strategic flexibility, rigidity and barriers to the development of absorptive capacity in business markets: Themes and research perspectives , 2005 .

[64]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[65]  David B. Montgomery,et al.  Resource commitment, entry timing, and market performance of foreign direct investments in emerging economies: The case of Japanese international joint ventures in China , 2000 .

[66]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[67]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .

[68]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes , 2004 .

[69]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Managing the internationalization of R&D activities , 1996 .

[70]  Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Source-Recipient Complementarity in Designing new Products: an Empirically Derived Framework , 2008 .

[71]  James P. Neelankavil,et al.  Strategic resource commitment of high-technology firms: An international comparison , 2003 .

[72]  Sinan Aral,et al.  I.T. Assets, Organizational Capabilities and Firm Performance: Do Resource Allocations and Organizational Differences Explain Performance Variation? , 2007 .

[73]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[74]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[75]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era , 2010 .

[76]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[77]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[78]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Managing for an Uncertain Future A Systems View of Strategic Organizational Change , 1997 .

[79]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[80]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[81]  Ulrike de Brentani,et al.  Performance of Global New Product Development Programs: A Resource‐Based View , 2007 .

[82]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[83]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion , 1986 .

[84]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Contingencies within Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Interdependent Effects of Resource Investment and Deployment on Firm Performance , 2009 .