The Impact of Prescribed Ozone in Climate Projections Run With HadGEM3‐GC3.1

The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 protocol suggests prescribing preindustrial ozone concentrations in abrupt‐4xCO2 simulations. This leads to a mismatch between the thermal tropopause, which rises due to climate change, and the ozone tropopause, which remains fixed. The result is unphysically high ozone concentrations in the upper troposphere, leading to a warm bias in cold point temperature and increased stratospheric water vapor. In the U.K. physical climate model HadGEM3‐GC3.1 this increases the surface climate sensitivity. In the future, other climate models without interactive ozone schemes may face similar problems. We describe a method to interactively redistribute ozone in climate simulations, which removes the inconsistency between the thermal and ozone tropopause heights while retaining the prescribed ozone distribution as closely as possible. This removes unphysical consequences of the tropopause mismatch, while still allowing a fair comparison against other Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 model simulations. After each model year, the monthly mean, zonal mean, thermal tropopause is formed based on the previous two model years. The ozone tropopause is defined at 1 km below the thermal tropopause by setting ozone concentrations there to 80 ppbv, and smoothing appropriately. The mass of ozone removed from the troposphere is added to the stratosphere thus conserving the total mass of ozone. This redistribution is then applied proportionally to the 3‐D monthly mean ozone concentrations. The climate model is run for the following year, using this redistributed ozone, and then the whole process is repeated. Results are presented from preindustrial and abrupt‐4xCO2 simulations, but this method can be used for any climate simulation.

[1]  A. J. Hewitt,et al.  UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[2]  L. Polvani,et al.  The response of the ozone layer to quadrupled CO2 concentrations. , 2018, Journal of climate.

[3]  L. Polvani,et al.  Stratospheric water vapor: an important climate feedback , 2018, Climate Dynamics.

[4]  Mohamed Zerroukat,et al.  The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations , 2011, Geoscientific Model Development.

[5]  Antony Siahaan,et al.  The Low‐Resolution Version of HadGEM3 GC3.1: Development and Evaluation for Global Climate , 2018, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[6]  L. Pan,et al.  Lapse Rate or Cold Point: The Tropical Tropopause Identified by In Situ Trace Gas Measurements , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[7]  P. Earnshaw,et al.  Ozone sensitivity of tropical upper‐troposphere and stratosphere temperature in the MetOffice Unified Model , 2018, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[8]  Peter Braesicke,et al.  The Impact of Stratospheric Ozone Feedbacks on Climate Sensitivity Estimates , 2018 .

[9]  D. N. Walters,et al.  The Met Office Global Coupled Model 3.0 and 3.1 (GC3.0 and GC3.1) Configurations , 2017 .

[10]  Peter Braesicke,et al.  On the role of ozone feedback in the ENSO amplitude response under global warming , 2017, Geophysical research letters.

[11]  L. Polvani,et al.  Reduced Southern Hemispheric circulation response to quadrupled CO2 due to stratospheric ozone feedback , 2017 .

[12]  Markus Gross,et al.  The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 6.0/6.1 and JULES Global Land 6.0/6.1 configurations , 2017 .

[13]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[14]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Stratospheric ozone chemistry feedbacks are not critical for the determination of climate sensitivity in CESM1(WACCM) , 2016 .

[15]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[16]  N. Abraham,et al.  Processes Controlling Tropical Tropopause Temperature and Stratospheric Water Vapor in Climate Models , 2015 .

[17]  Annette Osprey,et al.  A large ozone-circulation feedback and its implications for global warming assessments , 2014, Nature climate change.

[18]  S. Brönnimann,et al.  The coupled atmosphere–chemistry–ocean model SOCOL-MPIOM , 2014 .

[19]  R. Sausen,et al.  Interactive ozone induces a negative feedback in CO2‐driven climate change simulations , 2014 .

[20]  K. Rosenlof,et al.  Stratospheric water vapor feedback , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  K. Taylor,et al.  Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate models , 2012 .

[22]  T. Hinton,et al.  Sensitivity of GCM tropical middle atmosphere variability and climate to ozone and parameterized gravity wave changes , 2010 .

[23]  M. Webb,et al.  Stratospheric water vapour and high climate sensitivity in a version of the HadSM3 climate model , 2010 .

[24]  O. Boucher Stratospheric ozone, ultraviolet radiation and climate change , 2010 .

[25]  S. Solomon,et al.  Contributions of Stratospheric Water Vapor to Decadal Changes in the Rate of Global Warming , 2010, Science.

[26]  C. Brühl,et al.  Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Extratropics , 2010 .

[27]  C. Brühl,et al.  Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Tropics and global trends , 2010 .

[28]  Adam A. Scaife,et al.  Stratospheric temperature trends: impact of ozone variability and the QBO , 2010 .

[29]  S. Rumbold,et al.  Stratospheric Temperature and Radiative Forcing Response to 11-Year Solar Cycle Changes in Irradiance and Ozone , 2009 .

[30]  Warm and sensitive Paleocene-Eocene climate , 2009 .

[31]  W. Randel,et al.  A stratospheric ozone profile data set for 1979–2005: Variability, trends, and comparisons with column ozone data , 2007 .

[32]  Gill Martin,et al.  The Physical Properties of the Atmosphere in the New Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part II: Aspects of Variability and Regional Climate , 2006 .

[33]  G. Martin,et al.  The Physical Properties of the Atmosphere in the New Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part I: Model Description and Global Climatology , 2006 .

[34]  S. Fueglistaler,et al.  Control of interannual and longer‐term variability of stratospheric water vapor , 2005 .

[35]  R. Sausen,et al.  Why radiative forcing might fail as a predictor of climate change , 2005 .

[36]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[37]  Adam A. Scaife,et al.  Can changes in ENSO activity help to explain increasing stratospheric water vapor? , 2003 .

[38]  R. Sausen,et al.  Contributions of Anthropogenic and Natural Forcing to Recent Tropopause Height Changes , 2003, Science.

[39]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Tropical Cold Point Tropopause Characteristics Derived from ECMWF Reanalyses and Soundings , 2001 .

[40]  G. Vaughan,et al.  A comparison of ozone and thermal tropopause heights and the impact of tropopause definition on quantifying the ozone content of the troposphere , 1996 .