Duration adaptation modulates EEG correlates of subsequent temporal encoding

ABSTRACT Repetitive exposure to relatively long or short sensory events has been shown to shorten or lengthen the perceived duration of a subsequent event. However, the neural basis of this phenomenon, called duration adaptation, remains unclear. In this study, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate whether duration adaptation could modulate the subsequent temporal encoding represented by the contingent negative variation (CNV). Participants were asked to reproduce the duration of a test stimulus after adapting duration (Experiment 1) or after anchor duration (Experiment 2). We found that both adapting duration and anchor duration affected the reproduction duration of a subsequently presented test stimulus. The simultaneously recorded event‐related potentials (ERPs) revealed that test stimuli evoked clearly identifiable N1, P2 and CNV components in the fronto‐central scalp. Further analyses showed that the CNV amplitude was modulated by duration adaptation: adaptation to shorter duration (200 ms) increased whereas adaptation to longer duration (800 ms) decreased the CNV amplitude. These findings suggest that the neural correlates of temporal encoding represented by the CNV amplitude reflect the duration aftereffect. Additionally, the duration adaptation effect observed on the P2 component also suggests an early expectancy effect on subsequent encoding processes. Finally, no effect of anchor duration was observed on the CNV amplitude, which implies that different mechanisms underlie the duration aftereffect and the anchor effect. HIGHLIGHTSThe neural basis of duration adaptation was investigated.Duration adaptation influenced both CNV and P2 components.A single anchor duration did not modulate the subsequent ERPs.

[1]  Martin Wiener,et al.  Parietal Influence on Temporal Encoding Indexed by Simultaneous Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Kwun Kei Ng,et al.  Temporal Accumulation and Decision Processes in the Duration Bisection Task Revealed by Contingent Negative Variation , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[3]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Judgments of weight as affected by adaptation range, adaptation duration, magnitude of unlabeled anchor, and judgmental language. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Warren H. Meck,et al.  Contingent negative variation and its relation to time estimation: a theoretical evaluation , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[5]  Martin Verner,et al.  The effect of nontemporal stimulus size on perceived duration as assessed by the method of reproduction. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[6]  Sheng He,et al.  Numerical magnitude modulates temporal comparison: An ERP study , 2009, Brain Research.

[7]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  The long and short of it: physical anchoring effects , 2006 .

[8]  J. H. Casseday,et al.  Neural tuning for sound duration: role of inhibitory mechanisms in the inferior colliculus. , 1994, Science.

[9]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  A neural hierarchy for illusions of time: duration adaptation precedes multisensory integration. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[10]  Denise H. Wu,et al.  Big Time Is Not Always Long , 2011, Psychological science.

[11]  Franck Vidal,et al.  The supplementary motor area in motor and sensory timing: evidence from slow brain potential changes , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Melissa J. Allman,et al.  Properties of the internal clock: first- and second-order principles of subjective time. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Zhuanghua Shi,et al.  Reducing Bias in Auditory Duration Reproduction by Integrating the Reproduced Signal , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Ellen Covey,et al.  Temporal Masking Reveals Properties of Sound-Evoked Inhibition in Duration-Tuned Neurons of the Inferior Colliculus , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  D. Eagleman,et al.  The Effect of Predictability on Subjective Duration , 2007, PloS one.

[16]  Masamichi J. Hayashi,et al.  Time Adaptation Shows Duration Selectivity in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2015, PLoS biology.

[17]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Attentional orienting towards emotion: P2 and N400 ERP effects , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  J. Gibbon Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[19]  G. Orban,et al.  Cortical Off Response Tuning for Stimulus Duration , 1996, Vision Research.

[20]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  F. Vidal,et al.  Event-Related Potentials as Indices of Time Processing: A Review , 2004 .

[22]  Andrei Gorea,et al.  Ticks per thought or thoughts per tick? A selective review of time perception with hints on future research , 2011, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[23]  W. Bevan,et al.  The Effect of Subliminal Shock upon the Judged Intensity of Weak Shock , 1960 .

[24]  Franck Vidal,et al.  The CNV peak: an index of decision making and temporal memory. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[25]  David M. Eagleman,et al.  Is Subjective Duration a Signature of Coding Efficiency , 2010 .

[26]  W. A. Hunt,et al.  Context effects with judgmental language that is absolute, extensive, and extra-experimentally anchored. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  W. Bevan,et al.  The perceived duration of auditory and visual intervals: cross-modal comparison and interaction. , 1961, American Journal of Psychology.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  S. Goldstone,et al.  The Time Sense: Anchor Effects and Apparent Duration , 1957 .

[30]  H. Coslett,et al.  Continuous Carryover of Temporal Context Dissociates Response Bias from Perceptual Influence for Duration , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Anchoring of Temporal Judgments , 1945 .

[32]  Richard Ragot,et al.  When time is up: CNV time course differentiates the roles of the hemispheres in the discrimination of short tone durations , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Niko A. Busch,et al.  Flicker-Induced Time Dilation Does Not Modulate EEG Correlates of Temporal Encoding , 2014, Brain Topography.

[34]  M. Treisman Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock". , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[35]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Human auditory event-related potentials predict duration judgments , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Youguo Chen,et al.  Visual duration aftereffect is position invariant , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[38]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  K. Crowley,et al.  A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  D. A. Nelson,et al.  Effects of intersignal interval on the human auditory evoked response. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  H. Helson Current trends and issues in adaptation-level theory. , 1964 .

[43]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  M. Westerfield,et al.  ERPs differentiate syllable and nonphonetic sound processing in children and adults. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[45]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  Y. Yotsumoto,et al.  Duration Adaptation Occurs Across the Sub- and Supra-Second Systems , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[47]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  R M Church,et al.  Properties of the Internal Clock a , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[49]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Visual P2 component is related to theta phase-locking , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[50]  Two new contingent aftereffects: Perceived auditory duration contingent on pitch and on temporal order , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  D. Eagleman Human time perception and its illusions , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[52]  James T. Walker,et al.  Simple and contingent aftereffects of perceived duration in vision and audition , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  The rhythm aftereffect: Support for time sensitive neurons with broad overlapping tuning curves , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[54]  Michael J. Constantino,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008 .

[55]  Tadeusz W Kononowicz,et al.  The contingent negative variation (CNV): timing isn’t everything , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[56]  Xiting Huang,et al.  The aftereffect of perceived duration is contingent on auditory frequency but not visual orientation , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[57]  Hedderik van Rijn,et al.  Decoupling Interval Timing and Climbing Neural Activity: A Dissociation between CNV and N1P2 Amplitudes , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  David Whitaker,et al.  Duration channels mediate human time perception , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  T. Penney,et al.  Probing interval timing with scalp-recorded electroencephalography (EEG). , 2014, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[60]  Martin Wiener,et al.  Repetition enhancement and memory effects for duration , 2015, NeuroImage.

[61]  P. Tse,et al.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  R. Ivry The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.