Enhancing grapevine breeding efficiency through genomic prediction and selection index

Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) breeding reaches a critical point. New cultivars are released every year with resistance to powdery and downy mildews. However, the traditional process remains time-consuming, taking 20 to 25 years, and demands the evaluation of new traits to enhance grapevine adaptation to climate change. Until now, the selection process has relied on phenotypic data and a limited number of molecular markers for simple genetic traits such as resistance to pathogens, without a clearly defined ideotype and was carried out on a large scale. To accelerate the breeding process and address these challenges, we investigated the use of genomic prediction, a methodology using molecular markers to predict genotypic values. In our study, we focused on two existing grapevine breeding programs: Rosé wine and Cognac production. In these programs, several families were created through crosses of emblematic and inter-specific resistant varieties to powdery and downy mildews. 30 traits were evaluated for each program, using two genomic prediction methods: GBLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor) and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator). The results revealed substantial variability in predictive abilities across traits, ranging from 0 to 0.9. These discrepancies could be attributed to factors such as trait heritability and trait characteristics. Moreover, we explored the potential of across-population genomic prediction by leveraging other grapevine populations as training sets. Integrating genomic prediction allowed us to identify superior individuals for each program, using multivariate selection index method. The ideotype for each breeding program was defined collaboratively with representatives from the wine-growing sector.

[1]  M. Tello-Ruiz,et al.  An improved reference of the grapevine genome reasserts the origin of the PN40024 highly homozygous genotype , 2023, G3.

[2]  L. F. V. Ferrão,et al.  Using visual scores and categorical data for genomic prediction of complex traits in breeding programs , 2023, bioRxiv.

[3]  R. Töpfer,et al.  A cool climate perspective on grapevine breeding: climate change and sustainability are driving forces for changing varieties in a traditional market , 2022, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[4]  T. Flutre,et al.  A genome-wide association and prediction study in grapevine deciphers the genetic architecture of multiple traits and identifies genes under many new QTLs , 2022, bioRxiv.

[5]  P. This,et al.  Interest of phenomic prediction as an alternative to genomic prediction in grapevine , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  T. Flutre,et al.  Across-population genomic prediction in grapevine opens up promising prospects for breeding , 2021, bioRxiv.

[7]  T. Flutre,et al.  Harnessing multivariate, penalized regression methods for genomic prediction and QTL detection of drought-related traits in grapevine , 2021, G3.

[8]  S. Lemarié,et al.  Why and How to Switch to Genomic Selection: Lessons From Plant and Animal Breeding Experience , 2021, Frontiers in Genetics.

[9]  P. Darriet,et al.  Grape Berry Secondary Metabolites and Their Modulation by Abiotic Factors in a Climate Change Scenario–A Review , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[10]  Ariel W. Chan,et al.  Genomic mating in outbred species: predicting cross usefulness with additive and total genetic covariance matrices , 2021, bioRxiv.

[11]  R. Snowdon,et al.  How Population Structure Impacts Genomic Selection Accuracy in Cross-Validation: Implications for Practical Breeding , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[12]  Tiago Olivoto,et al.  MGIDI: toward an effective multivariate selection in biological experiments , 2020, Bioinform..

[13]  T. Lacombe,et al.  Temperature-based grapevine sugar ripeness modelling for a wide range of Vitis vinifera L. cultivars , 2020 .

[14]  L. Leolini,et al.  A Review of the Potential Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Options for European Viticulture , 2020 .

[15]  C. F. Azevedo,et al.  Cassava yield traits predicted by genomic selection methods , 2019, PloS one.

[16]  A. Destrac-Irvine,et al.  An Update on the Impact of Climate Change in Viticulture and Potential Adaptations , 2019, Agronomy.

[17]  V. Dumas,et al.  INRA-ResDur: the French grapevine breeding programme for durable resistance to downy and powdery mildew , 2019, Acta Horticulturae.

[18]  T. Flutre,et al.  A novel high-density grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) integrated linkage map using GBS in a half-diallel population , 2019, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[19]  T. Flutre,et al.  A novel high-density grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) integrated linkage map using GBS in a half-diallel population , 2019, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[20]  Kevin P. Smith,et al.  Validating Genomewide Predictions of Genetic Variance in a Contemporary Breeding Program , 2019, Crop Science.

[21]  Reprint of: Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936) "On the Generalised Distance in Statistics." , 2018, Sankhya A.

[22]  Brian L. Browning,et al.  A one penny imputed genome from next generation reference panels , 2018, bioRxiv.

[23]  J. C. Machado,et al.  Multitrait index based on factor analysis and ideotype‐design: proposal and application on elephant grass breeding for bioenergy , 2018 .

[24]  G. de los Campos,et al.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives. , 2017, Trends in plant science.

[25]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Patterns of genomic and phenomic diversity in wine and table grapes , 2017, Horticulture Research.

[26]  T. Lacombe,et al.  Grapevine phenology in France: from past observations to future evolutions in the context of climate change , 2017 .

[27]  H. Maurer,et al.  Accuracy of within‐ and among‐family genomic prediction in triticale , 2017 .

[28]  J. Brillouet,et al.  Temperature desynchronizes sugar and organic acid metabolism in ripening grapevine fruits and remodels their transcriptome , 2016, BMC Plant Biology.

[29]  M. Resende,et al.  Genome selection in fruit breeding: application to table grapes , 2016 .

[30]  T. Lacombe,et al.  Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and power of a large grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) diversity panel newly designed for association studies , 2016, BMC Plant Biology.

[31]  Reinhard Töpfer,et al.  The use of molecular markers for pyramiding resistance genes in grapevine breeding , 2015 .

[32]  T. Lacombe,et al.  Genome-Wide Prediction Methods in Highly Diverse and Heterozygous Species: Proof-of-Concept through Simulation in Grapevine , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[34]  C. Alonso-Blanco,et al.  Genetic architecture of naturally occurring quantitative traits in plants: an updated synthesis. , 2014, Current opinion in plant biology.

[35]  Jeffrey B. Endelman,et al.  Ridge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP , 2011 .

[36]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species , 2011, PloS one.

[37]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[38]  Jay L. Lush,et al.  Animal Breeding Plans , 2008 .

[39]  Shizhong Xu,et al.  Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect. , 2003, Genetics.

[40]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[41]  D. Grant,et al.  Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci Using a Small Sample of Topcrossed and F4 Progeny from Maize , 1994 .

[42]  H. F. Smith,et al.  A DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION FOR PLANT SELECTION , 1936 .

[43]  R. Varshney,et al.  Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement , 2017, Springer International Publishing.

[44]  M. Goddard,et al.  Genomic selection: A paradigm shift in animal breeding , 2016 .

[45]  A. Reynolds Grapevine breeding programs for the wine industry : traditional and molecular techniques , 2015 .

[46]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Genomic selection in plant breeding. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[47]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[48]  R. Bernardo Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids , 1994 .