Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior

Living cells sense the rigidity of their environment and adapt their activity to it. In particular, cells cultured on elastic substrates align their shape and their traction forces along the direction of highest stiffness and preferably migrate towards stiffer regions. Although numerous studies investigated the role of adhesion complexes in rigidity sensing, less is known about the specific contribution of acto-myosin based contractility. Here we used a custom-made single-cell technique to measure the traction force as well as the speed of shortening of isolated myoblasts deflecting microplates of variable stiffness. The rate of force generation increased with increasing stiffness and followed a Hill force–velocity relationship. Hence, cell response to stiffness was similar to muscle adaptation to load, reflecting the force-dependent kinetics of myosin binding to actin. These results reveal an unexpected mechanism of rigidity sensing, whereby the contractile acto-myosin units themselves can act as sensors. This mechanism may translate anisotropy in substrate rigidity into anisotropy in cytoskeletal tension, and could thus coordinate local activity of adhesion complexes and guide cell migration along rigidity gradients.

[1]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  J. Changeux,et al.  Effects of chlorpromazine and phencyclidine on mouse C2 acetylcholine receptor kinetics. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Mechanical forces alter zyxin unbinding kinetics within focal adhesions of living cells , 2006, Journal of cellular physiology.

[5]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Mechanical response analysis and power generation by single-cell stretching. , 2005, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[6]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Fibronectin rigidity response through Fyn and p130Cas recruitment to the leading edge. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  John V. Small,et al.  Mechanosensing in actin stress fibers revealed by a close correlation between force and protein localization , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  W. O. Fenn.  The relation between the work performed and the energy liberated in muscular contraction , 1924, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[10]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[11]  J. Patlak,et al.  Slip sliding away: load-dependence of velocity generated by skeletal muscle myosin molecules in the laser trap. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[13]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[14]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Muscles, Reflexes, and Locomotion , 1984 .

[16]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Mechanotransduction, asthma, and airway smooth muscle. , 2007, Drug discovery today. Disease models.

[18]  A. Huxley.  Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[19]  D E Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. , 1993, Science.

[20]  Atef Asnacios,et al.  Microplates-based rheometer for a single living cell , 2006 .

[21]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[22]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[23]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction: All Signals Point to Cytoskeleton, Matrix, and Integrins , 2002, Science's STKE.

[24]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  A. Arner,et al.  Blebbistatin specifically inhibits actin-myosin interaction in mouse cardiac muscle. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[26]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Directed Movement of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells on Gradient-Compliant Hydrogels† , 2003 .

[27]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[28]  J. Sellers,et al.  Mechanism of Blebbistatin Inhibition of Myosin II* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  The relationship between force and focal complex development , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  I. N. Sneddon.  The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile , 1965 .

[31]  D. Ingber,et al.  Integrins as mechanochemical transducers. , 1991, Current opinion in cell biology.

[32]  Masaaki Yoshigi,et al.  Mechanical force mobilizes zyxin from focal adhesions to actin filaments and regulates cytoskeletal reinforcement , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[34]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[35]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[36]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[37]  B. Geiger,et al.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[38]  D. Ingber.  Mechanosensation through integrins: Cells act locally but think globally , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.