Femoral head viability after Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty: assessment with use of [18F] fluoride positron emission tomography.

BACKGROUND Total hip resurfacing has become increasingly popular over the last decade. There remains concern about the effect of the surgical approach on femoral head viability and the role of resurfacing in the management of established osteonecrosis. In view of these concerns, we examined femoral head viability following resurfacing through a modified anterolateral approach. METHODS The viability of the femoral heads of ten patients who had undergone successful unilateral Birmingham hip resurfacing was assessed with use of positron emission tomography in conjunction with the injection of fluorine at a mean of twenty months after surgery. For each patient, in both the hip that had undergone resurfacing and the contralateral nonresurfaced hip, activity was measured in four regions of interest: the lateral aspect of the femoral head, the medial aspect of the femoral head, the lateral aspect of the femoral neck, and the proximal aspect of the femur. The uptake of fluorine in each area was converted to standard uptake volumes. RESULTS No areas of osteonecrosis were seen in the femoral head of any patient. There were no significant differences in the standard uptake volumes as measured in the four regions of the nonresurfaced hips, whereas the median values were higher in all four regions of the resurfaced hips. The difference between the values in the resurfaced hips compared with those in the nonresurfaced hips was only significant (p < 0.05) in the lateral aspect of the femoral head. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes positron emission tomography in conjunction with injection of fluorine as a possible modality for the assessment of femoral head viability after hip resurfacing. Viability following successful Birmingham hip resurfacing performed through a modified anterolateral approach has also been demonstrated. The increase in bone activity that was seen in the resurfaced hips in our study group may be related to bone remodeling or reperfusion of small areas of osteonecrosis. This technique offers the potential to study femoral head perfusion and viability following all types of resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors on jbjs.org for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  R. Ganz,et al.  Anatomic considerations for the choice of surgical approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[2]  D. Back,et al.  Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  P. Pynsent,et al.  Metal on Metal Surface Replacement of the Hip: Experience of the McMinn Prosthesis , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  I. Fogelman,et al.  The role of positron emission tomography in skeletal disease. , 2001, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[5]  P B Pynsent,et al.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  P. Roberts,et al.  The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[7]  D W Murray,et al.  Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  P. Campbell,et al.  Viability of femoral heads treated with resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  R. Soni An anterolateral approach to the hip joint. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  J Bare,et al.  Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[11]  A Shimmin,et al.  Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  P. Waters,et al.  Effect of tendon transfers and extra-articular soft-tissue balancing on glenohumeral development in brachial plexus birth palsy. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  P B Pynsent,et al.  Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  T Nishii,et al.  Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  Robert N. Hensinger,et al.  Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons , 1995 .

[16]  P. Marsden,et al.  Quantification of Skeletal Kinetic Indices in Paget's Disease Using Dynamic18F‐Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  W. Brenner,et al.  Assessment of the metabolic activity of bone grafts with 18F-fluoride PET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  H. Gill,et al.  The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  R. Ganz,et al.  Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  J. Waddell,et al.  Greater trochanteric blood flow during total hip arthroplasty using a posterior approach. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  R. Ganz,et al.  Distribution of vascular foramina around the femoral head and neck junction: relevance for conservative intracapsular procedures of the hip. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[22]  T. Schmalzried Total Resurfacing for Osteonecrosis of the Hip , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  D. Mcminn,et al.  Development of metal/metal hip resurfacing. , 2003, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[24]  B. Långström,et al.  Rapid bone and blood flow formation in impacted morselized allograftsPositron emission tomography (PET) studies on allografts in 5 femoral component revisions of total hip arthroplasty , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[25]  G. Blake,et al.  Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. , 2001, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[26]  P. Campbell,et al.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  G. Bormans,et al.  Measurement of skeletal flow with positron emission tomography and 18F-fluoride in femoral head osteonecrosis , 1998, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[28]  M. Grecula Resurfacing arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of the hip. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[29]  H. Amstutz,et al.  Evaluation of bony ingrowth by technetium diphosphonate and sulfur colloid scanning in porous hip resurfacing. , 1987, The Hip.