Forecasting the Primary Dimension of Social Perception: Symbolic and Realistic Threats Together Predict Warmth in the Stereotype Content Model.

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) posits two fundamental dimensions of intergroup perception, warmth and competence, predicted by social-structural dimensions of competition and status, respectively. However, the SCM has been challenged on claiming perceived competition as the socio-structural dimension that predicts perceived warmth. The current research improves by broadening warmth's predictor (competition) to include both realistic and symbolic threat from Integrated Threat Theory (Study 1). We also measure two components of the warmth dimension: sociability and morality. Study 2 tests new items to measure both threat and warmth. The new threat items significantly improve prediction of warmth, compared with standard SCM items. Morality and sociability correlate highly and do not differ much in their predictability by competition/threat.

[1]  M. Biernat,et al.  Violating American Values: A “Value Congruence” Approach to Understanding Outgroup Attitudes , 1996 .

[2]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment , 2013 .

[3]  Edwin Poppe,et al.  In-group favouritism and the reflection of realistic dimensions of difference between national states in Central and Eastern European nationality stereotypes , 1999 .

[4]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  Prejudice toward immigrants. , 1999 .

[5]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[6]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  A. Maass,et al.  The role of valence in the perception of agency and communion , 2008 .

[9]  W. Stephan,et al.  An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice , 2000 .

[10]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism Versus Racial Threats to the Good Life , 1981 .

[11]  M. Zanna.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1994 .

[12]  Simona Sacchi,et al.  You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.

[13]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation , 1998 .

[14]  S. Fiske,et al.  Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low , 2006, Psychological science.

[15]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  The Role of Threats in the Racial Attitudes of Blacks and Whites , 2002 .

[16]  Simona Sacchi,et al.  The Effects of Status on Perceived Warmth and Competence Malleability of the Relationship Between Status and Stereotype Content , 2010 .

[17]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. , 1994 .

[18]  Timuçin Aktan.  A Contextual Approach to Stereotype Content Model: Stereotype Contents in Context , 2013 .

[19]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Michael I. Norton,et al.  This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype , 2005 .

[21]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  Thinking about people: Contributions of a typological alternative to associationistic and dimensional models of person perception. , 1991 .

[22]  Able But Unintelligent: Including Positively Stereotyped Black Subgroups in the Stereotype Content Model , 2011, The Journal of social psychology.

[23]  Walter G. Stephan,et al.  The Role of Threat in Intergroup Relations , 2009 .

[24]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth , 1999 .

[25]  Joseph Schwarzwald,et al.  Prejudice toward Immigrants to Spain and Israel , 1998 .

[26]  S. Fiske,et al.  Integrating The Stereotype Content Model (Warmth And Competence) And The Osgood Semantic Differential (Evaluation, Potency, And Activity). , 2013, European journal of social psychology.

[27]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: how societies mind the gap. , 2013, The British journal of social psychology.

[28]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members☆ , 2013 .

[29]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Karen Phalet,et al.  Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: a study in six eastern‐European countries , 1997 .

[31]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  Compensation in intergroup relations: an investigation of its structural and strategic foundations. , 2015, The British journal of social psychology.

[32]  P. S. Vivekananthan,et al.  A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  It's all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception , 2008 .

[34]  A. Abele,et al.  Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Social Structure Shapes Cultural Stereotypes and Emotions: A Causal Test of the Stereotype Content Model , 2009, Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR.

[36]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[37]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  Data analysis: A model comparison approach (2nd ed.). , 2009 .

[38]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Negative Interdependence and Prejudice: Whence the Affect? , 1993 .

[39]  Simona Sacchi,et al.  Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering , 2011 .

[40]  S. Fiske,et al.  WHEN DO SUBGROUP PARTS ADD UP TO THE STEREOTYPIC WHOLE? MIXED STEREOTYPE CONTENT FOR GAY MALE SUBGROUPS EXPLAINS OVERALL RATINGS , 2005 .