Role of benchmark technology in sustainable value analysis: an application to Finnish dairy farms.

Sustainability is a multidimensional concept that entails economic, environmental, and social aspects. The sustainable value (SV) method is one of the most promising attempts to quantify sustainability performance of firms. SV compares performance of a firm to a benchmark, which must be estimated in one way or another. This paper examines alternative parametric and nonparametric methods for estimating the benchmark technology from empirical data. Reviewed methods are applied to an empirical data of 332 Finnish dairy farms. The application reveals four interesting conclusions. First, the greater flexibility of the nonparametric methods is evident from the better empirical fit. Second, negative skewness of the regression residuals of both parametric OLS and nonparametric CNLS speaks against the average-practice benchmark technology in this application. Third, high positive correlations across a wide spectrum of methods suggest that the findings are relatively robust. Forth, the stochastic decomposition of the disturbance term to filter out the noise component from the inefficiency term yields more realistic efficiency estimates and performance targets.

[1]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[2]  Timo Kuosmanen Representation Theorem for Convex Nonparametric Least Squares , 2008, Econometrics Journal.

[3]  J. Nousiainen,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus balances on Finnish dairy farms , 2008 .

[4]  J. Richmond Estimating the Efficiency of Production , 1974 .

[5]  D. Tyteca Sustainability Indicators at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[6]  W. Greene Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions , 1980 .

[7]  C. Timmer Using a Probabilistic Frontier Production Function to Measure Technical Efficiency , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[9]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[10]  P. Douglas,et al.  A theory of production , 1928 .

[11]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[12]  T. Hahn,et al.  Sustainable Value Added - Measuring Corporate Contributions to Sustainability Beyond Eco-Efficiency , 2004 .

[13]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[14]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework , 2004 .

[15]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Stochastic Nonparametric Envelopment of Data: Combining Virtues of Sfa and DEA in a Unified Framework , 2006 .

[16]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms—Concepts and Empirical Results , 1997 .

[17]  R. Färe,et al.  An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities , 1996 .

[18]  Mary C. Meyer An extension of the mixed primal–dual bases algorithm to the case of more constraints than dimensions , 1999 .

[19]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[20]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Valuing environmental factors in cost–benefit analysis using data envelopment analysis , 2007 .

[21]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth , 2008 .

[22]  Geurt Jongbloed,et al.  A canonical process for estimation of convex functions: the "invelope" of integrated Brownian motion + t4. , 2001 .

[23]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Neoclassical Versus Frontier Production Models? Testing for the Skewness of Regression Residuals , 2009 .

[24]  Frank Figge,et al.  The Cost of Sustainability Capital and the Creation of Sustainable Value by Companies , 2005 .

[25]  C. Lovell,et al.  Econometric Estimation of Technical and Environmental Efficiency: An Application to Dutch Dairy Farms , 1999 .

[26]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Stochastic Nonparametric Envelopment of Data: Cross-Sectional Frontier Estimation Subject to Shape Constraints , 2007 .

[27]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[28]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Benchmarking Sustainable Development : A Synthetic Meta-index Approach , 2002 .

[29]  S. Afriat Efficiency Estimation of Production Function , 1972 .

[30]  D. L. Hanson,et al.  Consistency in Concave Regression , 1976 .

[31]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of consumer durables using absolute shadow prices , 2007 .

[32]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis as Nonparametric Least-Squares Regression , 2010, Oper. Res..

[33]  F. Nevens,et al.  Farm gate nitrogen surpluses and nitrogen use efficiency of specialized dairy farms in Flanders: Evolution and future goals , 2006 .

[34]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might) , 2009 .

[35]  Yanqin Fan,et al.  Semiparametric Estimation of Stochastic Production Frontier Models , 1996 .

[36]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: A productive efficiency perspective , 1999 .

[37]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[38]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[39]  C. Hildreth Point Estimates of Ordinates of Concave Functions , 1954 .

[40]  S. Afriat THE CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS FROM EXPENDITURE DATA , 1967 .

[41]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency , 2007 .