Optimal design of drainage channel geometry parameters in vane demister liquid–gas separators

Abstract Vane liquid–gas demisters are widely used as one of the most efficient separators. To achieve higher liquid disposal and to avoid flooding, vanes are enhanced with drainage channels. In this research, the effects of drainage channel geometry parameters on the droplet removal efficiency have been investigated applying CFD techniques. The observed parameters are channel angle, channel height and channel length. The gas phase flow field was determined by the Eulerian method and the droplet flow field and trajectories were computed applying the Lagrangian method. The turbulent dispersion of the droplets was modeled using the discrete random walk (DRW) approach. The CFD simulation results indicate that by applying DRW model, the droplet separation efficiency predictions for small droplets are closer to the corresponding experimental data. The CFD simulation results showed that in the vane, enhanced with drainage channels, fewer low velocity sectors were observed in the gas flow field due to more turbulence. Consequently, the droplets had a higher chance of hitting the vane walls leading to higher separation efficiency. On the other hand, the parameters affect the liquid droplet trajectory leading to the changes in separation efficiency and hydrodynamic characteristic of the vane. To attain the overall optimum geometry of the drainage channel, all three geometry parameters were simultaneously studied employing 27 CFD simulation cases. To interpolate the overall optimal geometry a surface methodology method was used to fit the achieved CFD simulation data and finally a polynomial equation was proposed.

[1]  Aage Ingebret Jøsang,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Studies of Droplet-Gas Flow , 2002 .

[2]  Peter J. O'Rourke,et al.  A Spray/Wall Interaction Submodel for the KIVA-3 Wall Film Model , 2000 .

[3]  Koichi Iinoya,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A DROPLET SEPARATOR WITH MULTISTAGE ROWS OF FLAT BLADES , 1982 .

[4]  Elhame Narimani,et al.  Optimization of vane mist eliminators , 2011 .

[5]  S. A. Morsi,et al.  An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  P. W. James,et al.  Assessment of an Eddy-Interaction Model and Its Refinements Using Predictions of Droplet Deposition in a Wave-Plate Demister , 1999 .

[7]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Computational Flow Modeling for Chemical Reactor Engineering , 2001 .

[8]  Suyi Huang,et al.  Numerical Study of Steam-Water Separators with Wave-type Vanes * , 2007 .

[9]  Barry J. Azzopardi,et al.  The Role of Drainage Channels in the Performance of Wave-Plate Mist Eliminators , 2003 .

[10]  Baosheng Jin,et al.  Study of the separation efficiency of a demister vane with response surface methodology. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[11]  Weeratunge Malalasekera,et al.  An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method , 2007 .

[12]  P. W. James,et al.  The Calculation of Wave-Plate Demister Efficiencies Using Numerical Simulation of the Flow Field and Droplet Motion , 1998 .

[13]  Leonardo Tognotti,et al.  A numerical model for gas flow and droplet motion in wave-plate mist eliminators with drainage channels , 2008 .

[14]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[15]  K. J. Mcnulty,et al.  Performance of commercial chevron mist eliminators , 1987 .