Computational tractability of chance constrained data envelopment analysis

Abstract Chance constrained data envelopment analysis (DEA) is developed for modeling data uncertainty in inputs and outputs of a set of decision making units (DMUs). In the existing literature, chance constrained DEA includes E-model and P-model. The E-model maximizes functions related to the expectation of random inputs and outputs. The P-model maximizes the probability of stochastic events related to the random inputs and outputs. However, optimization methods for solving these models lack a formulation to convert the resulting DEA models into tractable optimization methodologies. The current study examines the nonlinearity of the chance constrained DEA models by identifying and reformulating tractable optimization models into conic optimization problems. We relax the uncorrelation assumption which is usually adopted in the existing chance constrained DEA models. We extend chance constrained DEA from the Gaussian model to a distributionally robust model in order to deal with datasets where distributions of random inputs and outputs are only partially known in advance. An example is provided to demonstrate the reformulated forms of chance constrained DEA.

[1]  R. Koenker,et al.  Convex Optimization in R , 2014 .

[2]  Wanxi Li,et al.  Exploring supplier performance risk and the buyer's role using chance-constrained data envelopment analysis , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Data envelopment analysis : a handbook of models and methods , 2015 .

[4]  Jiamin Wang,et al.  Stochastic efficiency analysis with a reliability consideration , 2014 .

[5]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  Dominance stochastic models in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[7]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Nonparametric Efficiency EstimationIn Stochastic Environments , 2002, Oper. Res..

[8]  P. Kline Models of man , 1986, Nature.

[9]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Using Operational and Stock Analytics to Measure Airline Performance: A Network DEA Approach , 2019, Decis. Sci..

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[11]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A new chance-constrained DEA model with birandom input and output data , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Stochastics and Statistics , 2001 .

[14]  Patrizia Beraldi,et al.  Probabilistically constrained models for efficiency and dominance in DEA , 2009 .

[15]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Vendor Performance With Supply Risk: A Chance-Constrained DEA Approach , 2006 .

[16]  I. Olkin,et al.  Multivariate Chebyshev Inequalities , 1960 .

[17]  Ioannis E. Tsolas,et al.  Satisficing data envelopment analysis: a Bayesian approach for peer mining in the banking sector , 2017, Annals of Operations Research.

[18]  Thierry Post,et al.  Performance Evaluation in Stochastic Environments Using Mean-Variance Data Envelopment Analysis , 2001, Oper. Res..

[19]  Jean-Philippe Vial,et al.  Robust Optimization , 2021, ICORES.

[20]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  Assessing sustainability of supply chains by chance-constrained two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable factors , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[21]  V. Charles,et al.  Stochastic simulation based genetic algorithm for chance constrained data envelopment analysis problems , 2011 .

[22]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  Combining stochastic DEA with Bayesian analysis to obtain statistical properties of the efficiency scores: An application to Greek public hospitals , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  L. Cherchye NONPARAMETRIC EFFICIENCY ESTIMATION IN STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTS , 2000 .

[24]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis - A review , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Ling Lin,et al.  Stochastic network DEA models for two-stage systems under the centralized control organization mechanism , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[26]  O. Olesen Comparing and Combining Two Approaches for Chance Constrained DEA , 2006 .

[27]  A. Charnes,et al.  Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing under Chance Constraints , 1963 .

[28]  N. Petersen,et al.  Chance constrained efficiency evaluation , 1995 .

[29]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chapter 13 Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  Chance‐constrained data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[31]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis : a handbook of models and methods , 2015 .

[32]  W. Cooper,et al.  Chance Constrained Programming Formulations for Stochastic Characterizations of Efficiency and Dominance in DEA , 1998 .

[33]  Shie Mannor,et al.  Optimization Under Probabilistic Envelope Constraints , 2012, Oper. Res..