Effect of Nucleus Replacement Device Properties on Lumbar Spine Mechanics

Study Design. A validated nonlinear three-dimensional finite element model of a single lumbar motion segment (L3–L4) was used to evaluate a range of moduli for ideally conforming nucleus replacement devices. Objective. The objective of the current study was to determine the biomechanical effects of nucleus replacement technology for a variety of implant moduli. We hypothesized that there would be an optimal modulus for a nucleus replacement that would provide loading in the surrounding bone and anulus similar to the intact state. Summary of Background Data. Nucleus pulposus replacements are interventional therapies that restore stiffness and height to mildly degenerated intervertebral discs. Currently a wide variety of nucleus replacement technologies with a large range of mechanical properties are undergoing preclinical testing. Methods. A finite element model of L3–L4 was created and validated using range of motion, disc pressure, and bony strains from previously published data. The intact model was altered by changing the mechanical properties of the nucleus pulposus to represent a wide range of nucleus replacement technologies (E = 0.1, 1, 4, and 100 MPa). All of the models were exercised in compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Vertebral body strain, peak anulus fibrosus shear strain, initial bone remodeling stimulus, range of motion, and center of rotation were analyzed. Results. A nucleus replacement modulus of 1 and 4 MPa resulted in vertebral body strains similar to the intact model. The softest device indicated increased loading in the AF and bone resorption adjacent to the implant. Areas of strain maxima and bone formation were observed adjacent to the implant for the stiffest device. Conclusion. The current study predicted an optimal nucleus replacement of 1 to 4 MPa. An overly stiff implant could result in subsidence, which would preclude the benefit of disc height increase or restoration. Conversely, an overly soft implant could accelerate a degenerative cascade in the anulus.

[1]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Total Disc Replacement Positioning Affects Facet Contact Forces and Vertebral Body Strains , 2008, Spine.

[2]  R. C. Mulholland,et al.  The myth of lumbar instability: the importance of abnormal loading as a cause of low back pain , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[3]  P. Mummaneni,et al.  Nucleus replacement technologies. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[4]  S. Kurtz,et al.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[5]  N. Osada,et al.  Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360° fusion , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[6]  F. Geisler,et al.  Comparison of Biomechanical Function at Ideal and Varied Surgical Placement for Two Lumbar Artificial Disc Implant Designs: Mobile-Core Versus Fixed-Core , 2007, Spine.

[7]  Dawn M. Elliott,et al.  Material properties in unconfined compression of human nucleus pulposus, injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels and tissue engineering scaffolds , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[8]  L. Joskowicz,et al.  A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Multidirectional Testing of One- and Two-Level ProDisc-L Versus Simulated Fusions , 2007, Spine.

[10]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  L. Claes,et al.  Intradiscal Pressure, Shear Strain, and Fiber Strain in the Intervertebral Disc Under Combined Loading , 2007, Spine.

[12]  F. Pellisé,et al.  Radiologic Assessment of All Unfused Lumbar Segments 7.5 Years After Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion , 2007, Spine.

[13]  P. Barša,et al.  Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[14]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[15]  Thomas R. Oxland,et al.  Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[16]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  R. Bartels,et al.  Subsidence of Stand-alone Cervical Carbon Fiber Cages , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[18]  D. Elliott,et al.  Effects of Degeneration on the Biphasic Material Properties of Human Nucleus Pulposus in Confined Compression , 2005, Spine.

[19]  J. R. Parsons,et al.  Mechanical testing of a novel hydrogel nucleus replacement implant. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[20]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Finite Element Study of a Novel Intervertebral Disc Substitute , 2005, Spine.

[21]  Naresh Kumar,et al.  Analysis of Stress Distribution in Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2005, Spine.

[22]  R. Balderston,et al.  Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy. , 2005, Spine.

[23]  H. Tsumura,et al.  Three‐dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty–the influence of tibial component inclination , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  R. Guldberg,et al.  Trabecular bone microdamage and microstructural stresses under uniaxial compression. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Comparison of the biomechanical effects of posterior and anterior spine-stabilizing implants , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[26]  S. Garfin,et al.  History and evolution of disc replacement. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[27]  Matthew J. Allen,et al.  Preclinical Evaluation of a Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogel Implant as a Replacement for the Nucleus Pulposus , 2004, Spine.

[28]  Bryan W Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model , 2003, Spine.

[29]  L Claes,et al.  Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[30]  Stephen J. Ferguson,et al.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[31]  W. Beutler,et al.  Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK Proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[32]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  J. Delisle,et al.  Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[34]  Stephen J. Ferguson,et al.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[35]  L. Nolte,et al.  The Effect of Cement Augmentation on the Load Transfer in an Osteoporotic Functional Spinal Unit: Finite-Element Analysis , 2003, Spine.

[36]  C. D. Ray,et al.  Artificial Nucleus Replacement: Clinical Experience , 2002, Spine.

[37]  R. Bertagnoli,et al.  Surgical and clinical results with the PDN® prosthetic disc-nucleus device , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[38]  Thomas R. Oxland,et al.  The Effect of Nucleotomy on Lumbar Spine Mechanics in Compression and Shear Loading , 2001, Spine.

[39]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[40]  D W Hukins,et al.  Replacing the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[41]  V. Goel,et al.  Load-Sharing Between Anterior and Posterior Elements in a Lumbar Motion Segment Implanted With an Artificial Disc , 2001, Spine.

[42]  J. Meakin,et al.  Replacing the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disk: prediction of suitable properties of a replacement material using finite element analysis , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[43]  G B Andersson,et al.  The Effect of Disc Degeneration and Facet Joint Osteoarthritis on the Segmental Flexibility of the Lumbar Spine , 2000, Spine.

[44]  D R Sumner,et al.  Sensitivity of periprosthetic stress-shielding to load and the bone density-modulus relationship in subject-specific finite element models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  A. Amis,et al.  Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. , 1999, Bone.

[47]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  W C Hayes,et al.  Load Sharing Between the Shell and Centrum in the Lumbar Vertebral Body , 1997, Spine.

[49]  A E Goodship,et al.  In Vivo Stress Measurement Can Predict Pain on Discography , 1996, Spine.

[50]  J. Challis.  A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Interlaminar Shear Stresses and Laminae Separation in a Disc: Finite Element Analysis of the L3‐L4 Motion Segment Subjected to Axial Compressive Loads , 1995, Spine.

[52]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Disc Degeneration Affects the Multidirectional Flexibility of the Lumbar Spine , 1994, Spine.

[53]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[54]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movements of the Whole Lumbar Spine and Lumbosacral Joint , 1989, Spine.

[55]  M. Panjabi,et al.  A Study of the Compressive Properties of Lumbar Vertebral Trabeculae: Effects of Tissue Characteristics , 1987, Spine.

[56]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression , 1986, Spine.

[57]  M. Adams,et al.  Gradual Disc Prolapse , 1985, Spine.

[58]  Pj Udoh,et al.  Rigid Body Motion Calculated From Spatial Co-ordinates of Markers , 2010 .

[59]  Josep A Planell,et al.  How does the geometry affect the internal biomechanics of a lumbar spine bi-segment finite element model? Consequences on the validation process. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[60]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[61]  N. Osada,et al.  Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion. , 2007, European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

[62]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[63]  D. Ku,et al.  Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[64]  Abhijeet Joshi,et al.  Functional compressive mechanics of a PVA/PVP nucleus pulposus replacement. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[65]  Jae Young Choi,et al.  Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[66]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. , 1987, Bone.

[67]  C. Spoor,et al.  Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[68]  U. Fernström.  Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. , 1966, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum.