Perspective, Orientation Disparity, and Anisotropy in Stereoscopic Slant Perception

Stereoscopic depth estimates are not predictable from the geometry of point disparities. The configural properties of surfaces (surface contours) may play an important role in determining, for example, slant responses to a disparity gradient, and the marked anisotropy in favour of slant around a horizontal axis. It has been argued that variation in slant magnitude are attributable to the degree of perspective conflict present and that anisotropy is attributable to orientation disparity, which varies with the axis of slant. Three experiments were conducted in which configural properties were varied to try and tease apart the respective roles of orientation disparity and conflicting perspective in determining stereoscopic slant perception and slant axis anisotropy. The results could not be accounted for by the magnitude of the orientation disparities present. Conflicting perspective cues appeared to play a role but only for slant around a vertical axis. It was concluded that there are important configural effects in stereopsis attributable neither to orientation disparity nor to perspective.

[1]  H. Wallach,et al.  Two forms of retinal disparity , 1976 .

[2]  G. Westheimer,et al.  The perception of depth in simple figures , 1984, Vision Research.

[3]  S. McKee,et al.  What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis? , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  C. Blakemore,et al.  A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  J. Ninio.  Orientational versus Horizontal Disparity in the Stereoscopic Appreciation of Slant , 1985, Perception.

[6]  B. Rogers,et al.  Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. , 1983, Science.

[7]  Allen Brookes,et al.  Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces , 1988, Vision Research.

[8]  B. Gillam,et al.  Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  B Gillam,et al.  Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  B Gillam,et al.  Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  S. McKee,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception , 1990, Vision Research.

[12]  Michael J. Morgan,et al.  Vision of solid objects , 1989, Nature.

[13]  B. Rogers,et al.  Disparity curvature and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces , 1989, Nature.