Taking account of uncertainties in digital land suitability assessment

Simulations are used to generate plausible realisations of soil and climatic variables for input into an enterprise land suitability assessment (LSA). Subsequently we present a case study demonstrating a LSA (for hazelnuts) which takes into account the quantified uncertainties of the biophysical model input variables. This study is carried out in the Meander Valley Irrigation District, Tasmania, Australia. It is found that when comparing to a LSA that assumes inputs to be error free, there is a significant difference in the assessment of suitability. Using an approach that assumes inputs to be error free, 56% of the study area was predicted to be suitable for hazelnuts. Using the simulation approach it is revealed that there is considerable uncertainty about the ‘error free’ assessment, where a prediction of ‘unsuitable’ was made 66% of the time (on average) at each grid cell of the study area. The cause of this difference is that digital soil mapping of both soil pH and conductivity have a high quantified uncertainty in this study area. Despite differences between the comparative methods, taking account of the prediction uncertainties provide a realistic appraisal of enterprise suitability. It is advantageous also because suitability assessments are provided as continuous variables as opposed to discrete classifications. We would recommend for other studies that consider similar FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations) land evaluation framework type suitability assessments, that parameter membership functions (as opposed to discrete threshold cutoffs) together with the simulation approach are used in concert.

[1]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library , 2015 .

[2]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[3]  Alfred E. Hartemink,et al.  Early soil knowledge and the birth and development of soil science. , 2010 .

[4]  David Clifford,et al.  Putting regional digital soil mapping into practice in Tropical Northern Australia , 2015 .

[5]  A. O'Geen,et al.  Revised Storie Index for Use with Digital Soils Information , 2008 .

[6]  Edzer J. Pebesma,et al.  Latin Hypercube Sampling of Gaussian Random Fields , 1999, Technometrics.

[7]  D. Raes,et al.  Environmental and socio-economic impacts of institutional reforms on the agricultural sector of Vietnam: Land suitability assessment for Robusta coffee in the Dak Gan region , 2005 .

[8]  David Clifford,et al.  Digital soil assessment for regional agricultural land evaluation , 2015 .

[9]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Digital soil assessment of agricultural suitability, versatility and capital in Tasmania, Australia , 2015 .

[10]  M. Pringle,et al.  Mapping depth-to-rock from legacy data, using a generalized linear mixed model , 2014 .

[11]  J. R. Quinlan.  Learning With Continuous Classes , 1992 .

[12]  A. Tatem,et al.  Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations , 2009 .

[13]  Günther Fischer,et al.  Model based analysis of future land-use development in China , 2001 .

[14]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Assessing uncertainty propagation through physically based models of soil water flow and solute transport , 2006 .

[15]  G. Robertson,et al.  The Need for a Coupled Human and Natural Systems Understanding of Agricultural Nitrogen Loss , 2015 .

[16]  M. Richardson,et al.  The Radiometric Map of Australia , 2009 .

[17]  Durga L. Shrestha,et al.  Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output , 2006, Neural Networks.

[18]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Assessing the productivity function of soils. A review , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[19]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  Multi-criteria characterization of recent digital soil mapping and modeling approaches , 2009 .

[20]  D. Huntington,et al.  Improvements to and limitations of Latin hypercube sampling , 1998 .

[21]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Uncertainty in prediction and interpretation of spatially variable data on soils , 1997 .

[22]  Richard Webster,et al.  Is soil variation random , 2000 .

[23]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Modelling soil attribute depth functions with equal-area quadratic smoothing splines , 1999 .

[24]  Edzer J. Pebesma,et al.  Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[25]  J. Walker,et al.  Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook , 1984 .

[26]  B. Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[27]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Digital Soil Assessments , 2017 .

[28]  H. van Keulen,et al.  Land Evaluation: From Intuition to Quantification , 1991 .

[29]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Local-scale spatial modelling for interpolating climatic temperature variables to predict agricultural plant suitability , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[30]  Deutsche Ausgabe.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006 , 2007 .

[31]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Digital soil assessment: Guiding irrigation expansion in Tasmania, Australia , 2012 .

[32]  Guangqing Chi,et al.  Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R , 2015 .

[33]  Steve Weston,et al.  Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the 'parallel' Package , 2015 .

[34]  Hongbo Liang,et al.  GIS based land suitability assessment for tobacco production using AHP and fuzzy set in Shandong province of China , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[35]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern applied statistics with S, 4th Edition , 2002, Statistics and computing.

[36]  Wolfram Mauser,et al.  Global Agricultural Land Resources – A High Resolution Suitability Evaluation and Its Perspectives until 2100 under Climate Change Conditions , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  R. Isbell.  Australian Soil Classification , 1996 .

[38]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[41]  David G. Rossiter.  ALES: a framework for land evaluation using a microcomputer , 1990 .

[42]  B. Minasny,et al.  Integrating climate into the Digital Soil Assessment framework to assess land suitability , 2014 .

[43]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Digital mapping of a soil drainage index for irrigated enterprise suitability in Tasmania, Australia , 2014 .

[44]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Using model averaging to combine soil property rasters from legacy soil maps and from point data , 2014 .

[45]  W. Mirschel,et al.  Assessing the Productivity Function of Soils , 2011 .

[46]  D. Rossiter.  A theoretical framework for land evaluation , 1996 .

[47]  Diego de la Rosa,et al.  Soil-specific agro-ecological strategies for sustainable land use – A case study by using MicroLEIS DSS in Sevilla Province (Spain) , 2009 .

[48]  Mapping the occurrence and thickness of soil horizons within soil profiles , 2012 .

[49]  D. Brus,et al.  Operationalizing digital soil mapping for nationwide updating of the 1:50,000 soil map of the Netherlands , 2015 .

[50]  R. Brink,et al.  A framework for land evaluation , 1977 .

[51]  P.A.L. Le Roux,et al.  Functional digital soil mapping: A case study from Namarroi, Mozambique☆ , 2014 .

[52]  Dominique Arrouays,et al.  GlobalSoilMap : Basis of the global spatial soil information system , 2014 .

[53]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Framing soils as an actor when dealing with wicked environmental problems , 2013 .