Recurrence quantification analysis of surface electromyogram supports alterations in motor unit recruitment strategies by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

PURPOSE Recent evidence indicates that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can selectively alter the EMG/force relationship of agonist arm muscles; however, the mechanisms mediating those changes are less clear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of anodal tDCS on motor unit synchronization by using a sophisticated non-linear EMG analysis called recurrence quantification analysis (RQA). METHODS Surface EMG signals were collected from the biceps brachii muscle of eighteen healthy young adults (9 tDCS and 9 control) at various force levels (12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, and 50% maximum) before and after the application of anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex. RQA was employed to quantify the changes in percentage of determinism (% DET) and laminarity (% LAM) of the surface EMG signals, which are surrogate measures of motor unit synchronization. RESULTS RQA analyses indicated that the changes in % DET and % LAM scores were significantly higher in the tDCS group than in the control group (p < 0.05) and this effect was particularly pronounced at higher force levels. CONCLUSION The results of this study provide novel evidence supporting that anodal tDCS significantly alters motor unit firing strategies (i.e., the degree of synchronization) of the biceps brachii muscle.

[1]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems , 2009 .

[2]  R. Mazzocchio,et al.  Recurrence quantification analysis of surface EMG detects changes in motor unit synchronization induced by recurrent inhibition , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Norbert Marwan,et al.  Recurrence plots 25 years later —Gaining confidence in dynamical transitions , 2013, 1306.0688.

[4]  Anirban Dutta,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of electromyogram following gait training with myoelectrically triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation in stroke survivors , 2012, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing.

[5]  C L Webber,et al.  Influence of isometric loading on biceps EMG dynamics as assessed by linear and nonlinear tools. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  H. Clamann,et al.  Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press COMPARISON OF THE RECRUITMENT AND DISCHARGE PROPERTIES OF MOTOR UNITS IN H U M A N BRACHIAL BICEPS AND A D D U C T O R POLLICIS D U R I N G ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS , 2018 .

[7]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Elbow Flexor Muscle Recruitment Strategies , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[8]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  D. Halliday,et al.  The frequency content of common synaptic inputs to motoneurones studied during voluntary isometric contraction in man. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  V Achache,et al.  Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on spinal network excitability in humans , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  V Achache,et al.  Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  R. Enoka,et al.  Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems , 1987 .

[14]  D. Farina,et al.  Nonlinear surface EMG analysis to detect changes of motor unit conduction velocity and synchronization. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  B. Bussel,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex induces opposite modulation of reciprocal inhibition in wrist extensor and flexor. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Ulf Ziemann,et al.  Metaplasticity in Human Cortex , 2015, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[17]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  W. Rymer,et al.  Decorrelating actions of Renshaw interneurons on the firing of spinal motoneurons within a motor nucleus: a simulation study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Fraser,et al.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[20]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[21]  John G Semmler,et al.  Motor Unit Synchronization and Neuromuscular Performance , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[22]  H. Abarbanel,et al.  Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[23]  J. Vedel,et al.  Motor unit synchronous firing as revealed by determinism of surface myoelectric signal , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  F Felici,et al.  Detection of hidden rhythms in surface EMG signals with a non-linear time-series tool. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  A. Antal,et al.  Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation. , 2014, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[26]  J. Kurths,et al.  Recurrence-plot-based measures of complexity and their application to heart-rate-variability data. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  C J De Luca,et al.  Synchronization of motor-unit firings in several human muscles. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  T. Beck,et al.  Synchronization of low‐ and high‐threshold motor units , 2014, Muscle & nerve.

[29]  Annie Schmied,et al.  Electromechanical coupling and synchronous firing of single wrist extensor motor units in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  B. Fling,et al.  Motor unit synchronization in FDI and biceps brachii muscles of strength-trained males. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[31]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Isometric contraction interferes with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induced plasticity: evidence of state-dependent neuromodulation in human motor cortex. , 2011, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Antal,et al.  Modulating neuronal excitability in the motor cortex with tDCS shows moderate hemispheric asymmetry due to subjects' handedness: a pilot study. , 2012, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.