Discrimination of sterile oat (Avena sterilis) in winter barley (Hordeum vulgare) using QuickBird satellite images

Abstract Site-specific weed management implies detecting the location of weeds in order to generate maps of their spatial distribution. This information facilitates a more accurate application of herbicides, spraying them in the exact areas of weed growth and in the required doses. In order to explore the potential of commercial satellites to discriminate and map weeds, we used the information contained in high spatial resolution images acquired by the QuickBird satellite to assess the density of sterile oat ( Avena sterilis ) present in a winter barley field at two different dates (March and June). Our results confirmed the potential of using satellite images in the spectral discrimination of weed patches in infested fields. The results of binary logistic regressions showed that the best matches in the classification of three categories (low, medium, or high sterile oat densities) corresponded to the March image. QuickBird’s March image provided reliable estimates of sterile oat patches in barley crops when weed density was relatively high (between 86% and 94% of agreement between predicted and observed densities). However, when weed densities were lower than 10 plants/m 2 there were serious difficulties to distinguish them from weed-free zones (between 72 and 75% of global agreement in the classification) with large underestimation of medium density weed patches (10 plants/m 2 ). This is a potential limitation considering than the thresholds used for herbicide application decisions are generally close to this density. However, the information obtained may still be useful for producing field maps to describe the spatial distribution of this weed. Moreover, these studies have provided valuable information on the best spectral regions and/or vegetation indices for approaching discrimination between sterile oat and cereal crops and the most suitable period for it.

[1]  Scott D. Noble,et al.  Site-specific weed management: sensing requirements— what do we need to see? , 2005, Weed Science.

[2]  L. Tian,et al.  A Review on Remote Sensing of Weeds in Agriculture , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[3]  Lamb,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of mapping weeds in fallow fields using airborne digital imaging: Panicumeffusum in oilseed rape stubble , 1998 .

[4]  David Lamb,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Remote-Sensing and Mapping of Weeds in Crops , 2001 .

[5]  Francisca López-Granados,et al.  Spectral discrimination of Ridolfia segetum and sunflower as affected by phenological stage , 2006 .

[6]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[7]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Opportunities and limitations for image-based remote sensing in precision crop management , 1997 .

[8]  L. Bruce,et al.  Detection of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) with hyperspectral remote sensing. II. Effects of vegetation ground cover and reflectance properties , 2004, Weed Science.

[9]  G. Johnson,et al.  Spatial and temporal stability of weed populations over five years , 2000, Weed Science.

[10]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Potential for automatic weed detection and selective herbicide application , 1991 .

[11]  Nancy F. Glenn,et al.  A review of remote sensing of invasive weeds and example of the early detection of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) and babysbreath (Gypsophila paniculata) with a hyperspectral sensor , 2005, Weed Science.

[12]  David Riaño,et al.  Assessing the potential of hyperspectral remote sensing for the discrimination of grassweeds in winter cereal crops , 2011 .

[13]  P. Chavez.  Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections - Revisited and Improved , 1996 .

[14]  César Fernández-Quintanilla,et al.  Spatial stability of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana populations under annual applications of low rates of imazamethabenz , 2004 .

[15]  A. Huete.  A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[16]  L. Bruce,et al.  Detection of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) by hyperspectral remote sensing. I. Effects of tillage and cover crop residue , 2004 .

[17]  B. Pinty,et al.  GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites , 1992, Vegetatio.

[18]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Spatially selective application of herbicide to cereal crops , 1993 .

[19]  M. Jurado-Expósito,et al.  Multispectral classification of grass weeds and wheat (Triticum durum) using linear and nonparametric functional discriminant analysis and neural networks , 2008 .

[20]  R. B. Brown,et al.  Prescription Maps for Spatially Variable Herbicide Application in No-till Corn , 1995 .

[21]  Henning Nordmeyer,et al.  Patchy weed distribution and site-specific weed control in winter cereals , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[22]  Rew,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of mapping weeds in seedling crops using airborne digital imaging: Avena spp. in seedling triticale , 1999 .

[23]  W. Brien Henry,et al.  Spectral reflectance curves to distinguish soybean from common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) grown with varying soil moisture , 2004, Weed Science.

[24]  M. Jurado-Expósito,et al.  Spatial and temporal analysis of Convolvulus arvensis L. populations over four growing seasons , 2004 .

[25]  Reyer Zwiggelaar,et al.  A review of spectral properties of plants and their potential use for crop/weed discrimination in row-crops , 1998 .

[26]  Scott M. Swinton,et al.  Economics of site-specific weed management , 2005, Weed Science.

[27]  M. Jurado-Expósito,et al.  Spectral discrimination of wild oat and canary grass in wheat fields for less herbicide application , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.