New concepts of multiple tests and their use for evaluating high-dimensional EEG data

[1]  K. Gabriel,et al.  A Study of the Powers of Several Methods of Multiple Comparisons , 1975 .

[2]  Philip H. Ramsey.  Power Differences between Pairwise Multiple Comparisons , 1978 .

[3]  Power Differences Between Pairwise Multiple Comparisons: Comment , 1978 .

[4]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[5]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[6]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1989 .

[7]  S. S. Young,et al.  Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment , 1993 .

[8]  J. Booth,et al.  Resampling-Based Multiple Testing. , 1994 .

[9]  T. Gasser,et al.  EEG coherence in Alzheimer disease. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Troendle,et al.  A Stepwise Resampling Method of Multiple Hypothesis Testing , 1995 .

[11]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[12]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-related desynchronization (ERD) and the Dm effect: does alpha desynchronization during encoding predict later recall performance? , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  S. Sarkar.  Some probability inequalities for ordered $\rm MTP\sb 2$ random variables: a proof of the Simes conjecture , 1998 .

[14]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  A step-down multiple hypotheses testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate under independence , 1999 .

[15]  Russell D. Wolfinger,et al.  Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System , 1999 .

[16]  P Rappelsberger,et al.  Long-range EEG synchronization during word encoding correlates with successful memory performance. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  J. Troendle,et al.  Stepwise normal theory multiple test procedures controlling the false discovery rate , 2000 .

[18]  P Rappelsberger,et al.  Theta synchronization predicts efficient memory encoding of concrete and abstract nouns , 2000, Neuroreport.

[19]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[20]  C. Elger,et al.  Human memory formation is accompanied by rhinal–hippocampal coupling and decoupling , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  S. Sarkar.  Some Results on False Discovery Rate in Stepwise multiple testing procedures , 2002 .

[22]  Siu Hung Cheung,et al.  A modified Benjamini–Hochberg multiple comparisons procedure for controlling the false discovery rate , 2002 .

[23]  J. Fell,et al.  Rhinal–hippocampal theta coherence during declarative memory formation: interaction with gamma synchronization? , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  ON STEP-UP TESTS FOR COMPARING SEVERAL TREATMENTS , 2003 .

[25]  R. Paschke,et al.  Nonparametric multiple test procedures with data-driven order of hypotheses and with weighted hypotheses , 2004 .

[26]  Sabine Weiss,et al.  Multivariate tests for the evaluation of high-dimensional EEG data , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Charles W. Dunnett,et al.  Power and sample size comparisons of stepwise FWE and FDR controlling test procedures in the normal many-one case , 2004 .

[28]  R. Simon,et al.  Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data , 2004 .

[29]  Jaroslaw Zygierewicz,et al.  On the statistical significance of event-related EEG desynchronization and synchronization in the time-frequency plane , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  H. Keselman,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2005 .

[31]  H. Petsche,et al.  Probability mapping: Power and coherence analyses of cognitive processes , 2005, Brain Topography.