The WACMOS-ET project – Part 1: Tower-scale evaluation of four remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration algorithms

Abstract. The WAter Cycle Multi-mission Observation Strategy – EvapoTranspiration (WACMOS-ET) project has compiled a forcing data set covering the period 2005–2007 that aims to maximize the exploitation of European Earth Observations data sets for evapotranspiration (ET) estimation. The data set was used to run four established ET algorithms: the Priestley–Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory model (PT-JPL), the Penman–Monteith algorithm from the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) evaporation product (PM-MOD), the Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) and the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM). In addition, in situ meteorological data from 24 FLUXNET towers were used to force the models, with results from both forcing sets compared to tower-based flux observations. Model performance was assessed on several timescales using both sub-daily and daily forcings. The PT-JPL model and GLEAM provide the best performance for both satellite- and tower-based forcing as well as for the considered temporal resolutions. Simulations using the PM-MOD were mostly underestimated, while the SEBS performance was characterized by a systematic overestimation. In general, all four algorithms produce the best results in wet and moderately wet climate regimes. In dry regimes, the correlation and the absolute agreement with the reference tower ET observations were consistently lower. While ET derived with in situ forcing data agrees best with the tower measurements (R2  =  0.67), the agreement of the satellite-based ET estimates is only marginally lower (R2  =  0.58). Results also show similar model performance at daily and sub-daily (3-hourly) resolutions. Overall, our validation experiments against in situ measurements indicate that there is no single best-performing algorithm across all biome and forcing types. An extension of the evaluation to a larger selection of 85 towers (model inputs resampled to a common grid to facilitate global estimates) confirmed the original findings.

[1]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability , 2011 .

[2]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Global-Scale Comparison of MISR and MODIS Land Surface Albedos , 2011 .

[3]  Eva Borbas,et al.  Development of a Global Infrared Land Surface Emissivity Database for Application to Clear Sky Sounding Retrievals from Multispectral Satellite Radiance Measurements , 2008 .

[4]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  A methodology for surface soil moisture and vegetation optical depth retrieval using the microwave polarization difference index , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  R. Jeu,et al.  Global canopy interception from satellite observations , 2010 .

[6]  J. Janowiak,et al.  CMORPH: A Method that Produces Global Precipitation Estimates from Passive Microwave and Infrared Data at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2004 .

[7]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Global long‐term passive microwave satellite‐based retrievals of vegetation optical depth , 2011 .

[8]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data , 2015 .

[9]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Estimating Land Surface Evaporation: A Review of Methods Using Remotely Sensed Surface Temperature Data , 2008 .

[10]  Uang,et al.  The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis , 2010 .

[11]  Y. Ma,et al.  Development of a 10-year ( 2001 – 2010 ) 0 . 1 ◦ data set of land-surface energy balance for mainland China , 2014 .

[12]  Z. Su The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes , 2002 .

[13]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm , 2011 .

[14]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Scale influences on the remote estimation of evapotranspiration using multiple satellite sensors , 2006 .

[15]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  An Evaluation of Satellite Remote Sensing Data Products for Land Surface Hydrology: Atmospheric Infrared Sounder* , 2010 .

[16]  A. Baccini,et al.  Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar , 2011 .

[17]  Niko E. C. Verhoest,et al.  Improving terrestrial evaporation estimates over continental Australia through assimilation of SMOS soil moisture , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[18]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Evaluation of global observations‐based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations , 2011 .

[19]  J. Gash An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests , 1979 .

[20]  D. Mocko,et al.  Multimodel Analysis of Energy and Water Fluxes: Intercomparisons between Operational Analyses, a Land Surface Model, and Remote Sensing , 2012 .

[21]  Diego G. Miralles,et al.  Magnitude and variability of land evaporation and its components at the global scale , 2011 .

[22]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Multi-site evaluation of terrestrial evaporation models using FLUXNET data , 2014 .

[23]  J. Gash,et al.  The evaporation from Thetford Forest during 1975 , 1977 .

[24]  Thomas Koop,et al.  Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications , 2005 .

[25]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Modeling Evapotranspiration during SMACEX: Comparing Two Approaches for Local- and Regional-Scale Prediction , 2005 .

[26]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  The WACMOS-ET project – Part 2: Evaluation of global terrestrial evaporation data sets , 2015 .

[27]  P. Xie,et al.  Global Precipitation: A 17-Year Monthly Analysis Based on Gauge Observations, Satellite Estimates, and Numerical Model Outputs , 1997 .

[28]  Leung Tsang,et al.  A prototype AMSR-E global snow area and snow depth algorithm , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  Xiuji Zhou,et al.  Estimation of surface long wave radiation and broadband emissivity using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land surface temperature//emissivity products , 2005 .

[30]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends , 2015, Environmental Research Letters.

[31]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[32]  G. Burba,et al.  Novel design of an enclosed CO2/H2O gas analyser for eddy covariance flux measurements , 2010 .

[33]  F. Wimmer,et al.  Some aspects of the energy balance closure problem , 2006 .

[34]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Recent reversal in loss of global terrestrial biomass , 2015 .

[35]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[36]  Craig S. Long,et al.  The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc , 2010 .

[37]  Massimo Menenti,et al.  Estimation of sensible heat flux using the Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) and ATSR measurements , 2003 .

[38]  Z. Su The Surface Energy Balance System ( SEBS ) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes , 2002 .

[39]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[40]  Xuelong Chen,et al.  Development of a 10-year (2001–2010) 0.1° data set of land-surface energy balance for mainland China , 2014 .

[41]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data , 2007 .

[42]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Benchmark products for land evapotranspiration: LandFlux-EVAL multi-data set synthesis , 2013 .

[43]  B. Séguin,et al.  Review on estimation of evapotranspiration from remote sensing data: From empirical to numerical modeling approaches , 2005 .

[44]  Rowan Fealy,et al.  Comparison of ERA‐40, ERA‐Interim and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data with observed surface air temperatures over Ireland , 2011 .

[45]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Evaluation of the JRC-TIP 0.01° products over a mid-latitude deciduous forest site , 2011 .

[46]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Global estimates of the land–atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data, validated at 16 FLUXNET sites , 2008 .

[47]  R. Giering,et al.  Retrieving surface parameters for climate models from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) Albedo Products , 2007 .

[48]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals , 2011 .

[49]  Sonia I. Seneviratne,et al.  A site-level comparison of lysimeter and eddy covariance flux measurements of evapotranspiration , 2015 .

[50]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 1. Model formulation , 2007 .

[51]  T. Holmes,et al.  Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations , 2010 .

[52]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[53]  J. Janowiak,et al.  The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979-Present) , 2003 .

[54]  Dominique Carrer,et al.  Verification of the new ECMWF ERA-Interim reanalysis over France , 2010 .

[55]  J. Norman,et al.  A Two-Source Energy Balance Approach Using Directional Radiometric Temperature Observations for Sparse Canopy Covered Surfaces , 2000 .

[56]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply , 2010, Nature.

[57]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global intercomparison of 12 land surface heat flux estimates , 2011 .

[58]  Y. Hong,et al.  Vegetation Greening and Climate Change Promote Multidecadal Rises of Global Land Evapotranspiration , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[59]  A. Monin,et al.  Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere , 2009 .

[60]  S. Running,et al.  A continuous satellite‐derived global record of land surface evapotranspiration from 1983 to 2006 , 2010 .