Do foreign subsidiaries innovate and perform better in a cluster? A spatial analysis of Japanese subsidiaries in the US

Abstract The interrelationship between clustering, innovation, and performance of Japanese subsidiaries in the US is examined in this paper. First, we apply Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic to identify process innovation clustering among Japanese subsidiaries. The scale at which clustering occurs is regional rather than local, and cluster location captures the geographical environment of home-transplants from Japan. Second, we apply spatial autoregressive models to test the relationship between cluster location and innovation among Japanese subsidiaries. The results indicate that cluster location strengthens the relationship between subsidiary innovation and firm performance. Negative spatial autocorrelation shows that clustering contributes to innovation by facilitating proximate learning between less innovative laggards, and, leading innovative Japanese subsidiaries.

[1]  R. Pouder,et al.  Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation , 1996 .

[2]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[3]  L. Corrado,et al.  Identifying and Interpreting Regional Convergence Clusters Across Europe , 2005 .

[4]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[5]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[6]  J. LeSage.  Introduction to spatial econometrics , 2009 .

[7]  P. McCann,et al.  Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development , 2005 .

[8]  J. Cantwell.  Location and the multinational enterprise , 2009 .

[9]  Anupama Phene,et al.  How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries , 2003 .

[10]  R. Chandran,et al.  Resolving the process vs. product innovation dilemma: a consumer choice theoretic approach , 1996 .

[11]  F. Malerba,et al.  The Geography of Innovation and Economic Clustering: Some Introductory Notes , 2001 .

[12]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers, And Spatial Econometrics , 2003 .

[13]  Martin Andersson,et al.  Small business innovation: firm level evidence from Sweden , 2012 .

[14]  M. Brachert,et al.  Identifying industrial clusters from a multidimensional perspective: Methodical aspects with an application to Germany , 2011 .

[15]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  Vertical Keiretsu and Knowledge Spillovers in Japanese Manufacturing: An Empirical Assessment , 2000 .

[16]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[17]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[18]  H. Renski,et al.  A Descriptive Analysis of Discrete U.S. Industrial Complexes , 2005 .

[19]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[20]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Global R&D Activities of Japanese MNCs in the US: A Triangulation Approach , 2007 .

[21]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[22]  Ulf Andersson,et al.  Subsidiary importance in the MNC: What role does internal embeddedness play? , 2011 .

[23]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences , 2001 .

[24]  Jean-Marc Callois,et al.  The two sides of proximity in industrial clusters: The trade-off between process and product innovation , 2008 .

[25]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation , 1996 .

[26]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Towards a Knowledge‐based Theory of the Geographical Cluster , 2001 .

[27]  Inkyung Jung,et al.  A spatial scan statistic for ordinal data , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  What determines knowledge sourcing from host locations of overseas R&D operations?: A study of global R&D activities of Japanese multinationals , 2011 .

[29]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters , 2000 .

[30]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[31]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Response rates in international mail surveys: Results of a 22-country study , 1997 .

[32]  M. Porter.  Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy , 2000 .

[33]  M. Kulldorff,et al.  International Journal of Health Geographics Open Access a Scan Statistic for Continuous Data Based on the Normal Probability Model , 2022 .

[34]  Michael Porter,et al.  The Economic Performance of Regions , 2003 .

[35]  J. Parr.  Missing Elements in the Analysis of Agglomeration Economies , 2002 .

[36]  Jennifer Clark,et al.  Power in Firm Networks: What it Means for Regional Innovation Systems , 2007 .

[37]  R&D intensity for innovative and adaptive purposes in overseas subsidiaries: Evidence from Japanese multinational enterprises , 2009 .

[38]  Davide Quaglione,et al.  The effects of universities' proximity to industrial districts on university–industry collaboration , 2012 .

[39]  Breandán Ó Huallacháin.  Inventive Megaregions of the United States: Technological Composition and Location , 2012 .

[40]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[41]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 10 . 04 Localized Spillovers and Knowledge Flows : How Does Proximity Influence the Performance of Plants ? , 2010 .

[42]  D. Edgington,et al.  “Glocalization” and Regional Headquarters: Japanese Electronics Firms in the ASEAN Region , 2013 .

[43]  The changing geography of North American motor vehicle production , 2010 .

[44]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[45]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Do Clusters Generate Greater Innovation and Growth? An Analysis of European Regions , 2011 .

[46]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[47]  J. Holmes,et al.  Entrepreneurship, knowledge and learning in cluster formation and evolution: the Windsor Ontario tool, die and mould cluster , 2007 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[49]  M. Kulldorff.  A spatial scan statistic , 1997 .

[50]  Mercedes Teruel,et al.  An appraisal of firm size distribution: Does sample size matter? , 2012 .

[51]  John Cantwell,et al.  MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates , 2005 .

[52]  Hui Lin,et al.  An exploratory spatial analysis of western medical services in Republican Beijing , 2012 .

[53]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[54]  Inkyung Jung,et al.  A spatial scan statistic for multinomial data , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[55]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Geographical Clustering of Innovation , 2012 .

[56]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[57]  Y. Wei,et al.  Production and R&D Networks of Foreign Ventures in China: Implications for Technological Dynamism and Regional Development , 2009 .

[58]  Elena Huergo,et al.  How Does Probability of Innovation Change with Firm Age? , 2004 .

[59]  Stephanie Rosenkranz,et al.  Simultaneous choice of process and product innovation when consumers have a preference for product variety , 2003 .

[60]  Sal Kukalis.  Agglomeration Economies and Firm Performance: The Case of Industry Clusters , 2010 .

[61]  J. LeSage,et al.  Quantifying Knowledge Spillovers Using Spatial Econometric Models , 2009 .

[62]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[63]  Srilata Zaheer.  Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness , 1995 .