Factors Influencing Prognosis of Bundle Branch Block Complicating Acute Antero‐Septal Infarction: The Value of His Bundle Recordings

Of 50 consecutive patients with bundle branch block (BBB) complicating acute antero-septal infarction, 37 died in hospital. Patients with BBB of delayed onset or BBB of short duration had a significantly lower mortality. His bundle recordings were made in 35 patients without pulmonary edema or shock at the time of appearance of BBB. Thirteen of 16 patients with prolonged H-V intervals died compared to nine of 19 with normal H-V intervals (P < 0.05). In patients with bifascicular block, 11 of 15 with prolonged H-V intervals developed complete A-V block compared to one of ten with normal H-V intervals (P < 0.005).Twenty-five of 33 patients with normal P-R intervals died compared to eight of 12 with first degree A-V block. Seven of 15 patients with prolonged H-V intervals had normal P-R intervals and four of these seven developed complete A-V block. We conclude that the length of P-R interval has no prognostic significance and is of limited value in predicting both prolonged H-V interval and development of complete A-V block. In contrast, His bundle recordings are of value in identifying patients with BBB complicating antero-septal infarction who are at immediate high risk for development of complete A-V block and death.

[1]  E. Lichstein,et al.  Findings of prognostic value in patients with incomplete bilateral bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. , 1973, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  J. Vohra,et al.  Histopathology of Heart Block Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Correlation with the His Bundle Electrogram , 1973, Circulation.

[3]  C. B. Mullins,et al.  Ventricular conduction blocks and sudden death in acute myocardial infarction. Potential indications for pacing. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Norris,et al.  Conduction disturbances due to anteroseptal myocardial infarction and their treatment by endocardial pacing. , 1972, American heart journal.

[5]  M. Scheinman,et al.  Clinical and Anatomic Implications of Intraventricular Conduction Blocks in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1972, Circulation.

[6]  D. Durrer,et al.  Conduction Disturbances Located within the His Bundle , 1972, Circulation.

[7]  L. Gould,et al.  Prognosis of right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction. , 1972, JAMA.

[8]  D. Julian,et al.  Bilateral bundle-branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. , 1971, Lancet.

[9]  P. Scanlon,et al.  Right Bundle‐Branch Block Associated with Left Superior or Inferior Intraventricular Block: Clinical Setting, Prognosis, and Relation to Complete Heart Block , 1970, Circulation.

[10]  K. Rosen,et al.  Site of Heart Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1970, Circulation.

[11]  D. Julian,et al.  Complete bundle-branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. , 1970, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  M. Rosenbaum The hemiblocks: diagnostic criteria and clinical significance. , 1970, Modern concepts of cardiovascular disease.

[13]  D. Hunt,et al.  Bundle-branch Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1969, British medical journal.

[14]  B J Scherlag,et al.  Catheter Technique for Recording His Bundle Activity in Man , 1969, Circulation.

[15]  R. Langendorf,et al.  Atrioventricular Block, Type II (Mobitz)—Its Nature and Clinical Significance , 1968, Circulation.

[16]  H. Marriott Monitoring lead systems. , 1968, JAMA.

[17]  T. Killip,et al.  Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. , 1967, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  B. S. Lipman Clinical Scalar Electrocardiography , 1965 .

[19]  A. R. Barnes Essentials of electrocardiography , 1942 .

[20]  Wj Essentials of Electrocardiography , 1941 .