ARTSense: Anonymous reputation and trust in participatory sensing

With the proliferation of sensor-embedded mobile computing devices, participatory sensing is becoming popular to collect information from and outsource tasks to participating users. These applications deal with a lot of personal information, e.g., users' identities and locations at a specific time. Therefore, we need to pay a deeper attention to privacy and anonymity. However, from a data consumer's point of view, we want to know the source of the sensing data, i.e., the identity of the sender, in order to evaluate how much the data can be trusted. “Anonymity” and “trust” are two conflicting objectives in participatory sensing networks, and there are no existing research efforts which investigated the possibility of achieving both of them at the same time. In this paper, we propose ARTSense, a framework to solve the problem of “trust without identity” in participatory sensing networks. Our solution consists of a privacy-preserving provenance model, a data trust assessment scheme and an anonymous reputation management protocol. We have shown that ARTSense achieves the anonymity and security requirements. Validations are done to show that we can capture the trust of information and reputation of participants accurately.

[1]  Kyriakos Mouratidis,et al.  Preventing Location-Based Identity Inference in Anonymous Spatial Queries , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[2]  David Kotz,et al.  AnonySense: Opportunistic and Privacy-Preserving Context Collection , 2009, Pervasive.

[3]  Wen Hu,et al.  Towards trustworthy participatory sensing , 2009 .

[4]  Prasant Mohapatra,et al.  Collusion-resilient quality of information evaluation based on information provenance , 2011, 2011 8th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[5]  Prasant Mohapatra,et al.  Chaining for securing data provenance in distributed information networks , 2012, MILCOM 2012 - 2012 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[6]  Ling Liu,et al.  Protecting Location Privacy with Personalized k-Anonymity: Architecture and Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[7]  Thomas Seidl,et al.  A comparative study of similarity measures for content-based multimedia retrieval , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[8]  Ian Goldberg,et al.  A Survey of Anonymous Blacklisting Systems , 2010 .

[9]  Claudio Soriente,et al.  PEPSI: Privacy-Enhanced Participatory Sensing Infrastructure. , 2011, ACM WiSec 2011.

[10]  Tal Malkin,et al.  Reputation Systems for Anonymous Networks , 2008, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[11]  Apu Kapadia,et al.  Opportunistic sensing: Security challenges for the new paradigm , 2009, 2009 First International Communication Systems and Networks and Workshops.

[12]  Felix C. Freiling,et al.  Location privacy in urban sensing networks: research challenges and directions [Security and Privacy in Emerging Wireless Networks] , 2010, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[13]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Participatory Privacy in Urban Sensing , 2008 .

[14]  Minho Shin,et al.  AnonySense: A system for anonymous opportunistic sensing , 2011, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[15]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  A survey on privacy in mobile participatory sensing applications , 2011, J. Syst. Softw..

[16]  Jens-Peter Redlich,et al.  Sybil proof anonymous reputation management , 2008, SecureComm.

[17]  Latanya Sweeney,et al.  k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy , 2002, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  David Chaum,et al.  Blind Signatures for Untraceable Payments , 1982, CRYPTO.