Novel application of the gray-level co-occurrence matrix analysis in the parvalbumin stained hippocampal gyrus dentatus in distinct rat models of Parkinson's disease

To reveal the best choice of algorithm for parvalbumin-immunostained images of the hippocampal gyrus dentatus in two distinct rat models of Parkinson's disease (PD), particularly in terms of extracting the crucial information from the image, we tested whether the impact of experimentally induced dopaminergic (hemiparkinsonism) vs. cholinergic (PD cholinopathy) innervation impairment on the parvalbumin stained GABA interneurons could be detected using two separate algorithms, the fractal box-count and the gray-level co-occurrence matrix analysis (GLCM) algorithms. For the texture and fractal analysis of the hippocampal gyrus dentatus images, we used.tif images from three experimental groups of adult male Wistar rats: control rats, rats with Parkinson disease (PD) cholinergic neuropathology (with a PPT lesion), and hemiparkinsonian rats (with a SNpc lesion). For the suprapyramidal layer of the gyrus dentatus ASM and Entropy differentiated the images of the SNpc lesion versus the images of the control and the PPT lesion subjects, with significantly higher ASM and lower Entropy, indicating the homogenization of the images and their lower gray-level complexity. The infrapyramidal images of the SNpc group were differentiated versus the images from the control and PPT groups in terms of all the GLCM parameters: they showed lower mean Entropy and Contrast and higher ASM, Correlation and IDM. These results strongly suggest a rise in the uniformity, homogeneity and orderliness in the gray-levels of images from the SNpc group. Our results indicate that GLCM analysis is a more sensitive tool than fractal analysis for the detection of increased dendritic arborization in histological images.

[1]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  Bayan S. Sharif,et al.  Fractal analysis in the detection of colonic cancer images , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[3]  W. B. Marks,et al.  Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology — dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  K. Plataniotis,et al.  The Pan-Cytokeratin Staining Intensity and Fractal Computational Analysis of Breast Tumor Malignant Growth Patterns Prognosticate the Occurrence of Distant Metastasis , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[5]  B Julesz,et al.  Experiments in the visual perception of texture. , 1975, Scientific American.

[6]  J. Petrović,et al.  Sleep disorder and altered locomotor activity as biomarkers of the Parkinson’s disease cholinopathy in rat , 2018, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  E. Weibel Fractal geometry: a design principle for living organisms. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  Gabriela Castellano,et al.  Texture analysis of magnetic resonance images of patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy , 2013, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[9]  Antonio Di Ieva,et al.  The Fractal Geometry of the Brain , 2016, Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience.

[10]  I. Pantic,et al.  Effects of Ghrelin on the Structural Complexity of Exocrine Pancreas Tissue Architecture , 2013, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[11]  J. Saponjic,et al.  Alterations of Sleep and Sleep Oscillations in the Hemiparkinsonian Rat , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  I. Pantic,et al.  Age-related reduction of structural complexity in spleen hematopoietic tissue architecture in mice , 2013, Experimental Gerontology.

[13]  G. Paxinos,et al.  Chemoarchitectonic Atlas of the Rat Brain , 2008 .

[14]  A. Kassner,et al.  Texture Analysis: A Review of Neurologic MR Imaging Applications , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  G. Allan Johnson,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the C57BL/6J mouse brain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[17]  Igor Pantic,et al.  Application of Fractal and Grey Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Analysis in Evaluation of Brain Corpus Callosum and Cingulum Architecture , 2014, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[18]  S. Dacic,et al.  Discriminatory ability of fractal and grey level co-occurrence matrix methods in structural analysis of hippocampus layers. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  A. Kalauzi,et al.  Sleep spindles as an early biomarker of REM sleep disorder in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease cholinopathy , 2017 .

[20]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[21]  Mryka Hall-Beyer,et al.  GLCM Texture: A Tutorial v. 3.0 March 2017 , 2017 .

[22]  Nirupam Sarkar,et al.  An Efficient Differential Box-Counting Approach to Compute Fractal Dimension of Image , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[23]  J. Macgregor,et al.  Image texture analysis: methods and comparisons , 2004 .

[24]  D. Kolarevic,et al.  Comparison of Monofractal, Multifractal and gray level Co-occurrence matrix algorithms in analysis of Breast tumor microscopic images for prognosis of distant metastasis risk , 2016, Biomedical Microdevices.

[25]  Alexei Kouznetsov,et al.  Quantifying the architectural complexity of microscopic images of histology specimens. , 2009, Micron.