The multiscale perturbation method for second order elliptic equations

Abstract In the numerical solution of elliptic equations, multiscale methods typically involve two steps: the solution of families of local solutions or multiscale basis functions (an embarrassingly parallel task) associated with subdomains of a domain decomposition of the original domain, followed by the solution of a global problem. In the solution of multiphase flow problems approximated by an operator splitting method one has to solve an elliptic equation every time step of a simulation, that would require that all multiscale basis functions be recomputed. In this work, we focus on the development of a novel method that replaces a full update of local solutions by reusing multiscale basis functions that are computed at an earlier time of a simulation. The procedure is based on classical perturbation theory. It can take advantage of both an offline stage (where multiscale basis functions are computed at the initial time of a simulation) as well as of a good initial guess for velocity and pressure. The formulation of the method is carefully explained and several numerical studies are presented and discussed. They provide an indication that the proposed procedure can be of value in speeding-up the solution of multiphase flow problems by multiscale methods.

[1]  Dani Gamerman,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference , 1997 .

[2]  Felipe Pereira,et al.  On the numerical simulation of waterflooding of heterogeneous petroleum reservoirs , 1997 .

[3]  Yuanle Ma,et al.  Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media , 2007, Math. Comput..

[4]  Todd Arbogast,et al.  A Multiscale Mortar Mixed Finite Element Method , 2007, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[5]  Felipe Pereira,et al.  Design and implementation of a multiscale mixed method based on a nonoverlapping domain decomposition procedure , 2014, Math. Comput. Simul..

[6]  Richard E. Ewing,et al.  A time-discretization procedure for a mixed finite element approximation of miscible displacement in porous media , 1983 .

[7]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: a comparison of upscaling techniques , 2001 .

[8]  Felipe Pereira,et al.  A locally conservative Eulerian–Lagrangian numerical method and its application to nonlinear transport in porous media , 2000 .

[9]  Michael Presho,et al.  Operator Splitting Multiscale Finite Volume Element Method for Two-Phase Flow with Capillary Pressure , 2011 .

[10]  H. Tchelepi,et al.  Multi-scale finite-volume method for elliptic problems in subsurface flow simulation , 2003 .

[11]  R. LeVeque Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems: Characteristics and Riemann Problems for Linear Hyperbolic Equations , 2002 .

[12]  A. Nayfeh Introduction To Perturbation Techniques , 1981 .

[13]  Thomas Y. Hou,et al.  A Multiscale Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems in Composite Materials and Porous Media , 1997 .

[14]  Michael Presho,et al.  Application of the two-stage Markov chain Monte Carlo method for characterization of fractured reservoirs using a surrogate flow model , 2011 .

[15]  Roberto F. Ausas,et al.  The Multiscale Robin Coupled Method for flows in porous media , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Roberto F. Ausas,et al.  Interface spaces for the Multiscale Robin Coupled Method in reservoir simulation , 2019, Math. Comput. Simul..

[17]  Felipe Pereira,et al.  A multiscale direct solver for the approximation of flows in high contrast porous media , 2019, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[18]  Diego Paredes,et al.  Multiscale Hybrid-Mixed Method , 2013, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..