Lava flow surface roughness and depolarized radar scattering

Surface roughness has a strong controlling influence on radar scattering and other types of remote sensing observations. We compare field measurements of surface topography and dielectric constant for a range of lava flow textures to aircraft multipolarization radar observations at 5.7, 24, and 68 cm (C, L, and P band) wavelengths. The roughness is found to vary with scale in a self-affine (fractal) manner for scale lengths between 25 cm (the smallest horizontal step size) and 3–5 m. This result is used to demonstrate that a two-component surface description, consisting of the fractal dimension and rms height or slope at some reference scale, can resolve some of the ambiguities in previous efforts to quantify roughness. At all three radar wavelengths, the HV backscatter cross section is found to vary in an approximately exponential fashion with the rms height or Allan deviation at some reference scale, up to a saturation point, where the surface appears entirely diffusely scattering to the radar. Based on these observations, we use a parameter, γ, defined as the ratio of rms height to the particular scale of measurement. Backscatter values at 24-cm wavelength and the topographic profile data were used to derive expressions which link the HV radar cross section to γ or to the analogous wavelength-scale rms slope. These equations provide a reasonable fit to 24- and 68-cm echoes and for rough surfaces at 5.7 cm, but yield poor results for 5.7-cm echoes on smooth terrain. We conclude that the roughness at the two larger scales is well described by a single fractal dimension and rms height, but that texture at very small scales is characterized by different statistics. This inference is supported by analysis of 5-cm horizontal spacing topographic profiles. The relationships defined here allow determination of the surface rms height or slope at the scale of the radar wavelength. Given radar data at additional wavelengths, a more complete view of the statistical properties of the surface can be developed. Such techniques may be useful in analyses of synthetic aperture radar images for terrestrial volcanic areas, Magellan data for Venus, and other planetary radar observations.

[1]  P. Beckmann,et al.  The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces , 1963 .

[2]  T. Hagfors,et al.  Backscattering from an undulating surface with applications to radar returns from the Moon , 1964 .

[3]  R. Wagner Shadowing of Randomly Rough Surfaces , 1967 .

[4]  D. Barrick,et al.  SCATTERING FROM SURFACES WITH DIFFERENT ROUGHNESS SCALES: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION , 1967 .

[5]  B. Smith,et al.  Geometrical shadowing of a random rough surface , 1967 .

[6]  H. Tor,et al.  A Study of the Depolarization of Lunar Radar Echoes , 1967 .

[7]  T L Oliver,et al.  The Response of Terrestrial Surfaces at Microwave Frequencies , 1971 .

[8]  Walter E. Brown,et al.  Variations in surface roughness within Death Valley, California: Geologic evaluation of 25-cm-wavelength radar images , 1976 .

[9]  T. Farr,et al.  Remote sensing data of SP mountain and SP lava flow in north-central Arizona , 1980 .

[10]  B. Hapke Bidirectional reflectance spectroscopy , 1984 .

[11]  Tom Farr,et al.  Multipolarization Radar Images for Geologic Mapping and Vegetation Discrimination , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  G. Pettengill,et al.  Venus: Surface electromagnetic properties , 1988 .

[13]  D. Evans,et al.  Microwave dielectric spectrum of rocks , 1988 .

[14]  Peter J. Mouginis-Mark,et al.  A quad-pol radar scattering model for use in remote sensing of lava flow morphology , 1989 .

[15]  J. Zyl,et al.  Calibration of polarimetric radar images using only image parameters and trihedral corner reflector responses , 1990 .

[16]  S. Rowland,et al.  Pahoehoe and aa in Hawaii: volumetric flow rate controls the lava structure , 1990 .

[17]  Lisa R. Gaddis,et al.  Lava flow surface textures - SIR-B radar image texture, field observations, and terrain measurements , 1990 .

[18]  T. Farr,et al.  Inference of surface power spectra from inversion of multifrequency polarimetric radar data , 1991 .

[19]  Tom G. Farr,et al.  Microtopographic evolution of lava flows at Cima volcanic field, Mojave Desert, California , 1992 .

[20]  Lisa R. Gaddis,et al.  Lava-flow characterization at Pisgah volcanic field, California, with multiparameter imaging radar , 1992 .

[21]  Jakob J. van Zyl,et al.  Calibration of Stokes and scattering matrix format polarimetric SAR data , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[22]  Kamal Sarabandi,et al.  An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  B. Jakosky,et al.  Interpretation of planetary radar observations: the relationship between actual and inferred slope distributions , 1993 .

[24]  J. Garvin,et al.  Lava flow topographic measurements for radar data interpretation , 1993 .

[25]  D. Evans,et al.  Characterization of lava-flow degradation in the Pisgah and Cima volcanic fields, California, using Landsat Thematic Mapper and AIRSAR data , 1993 .

[26]  M. Shepard,et al.  RADAR POLARIZATION PROPERTIES OF VOLCANIC AND PLAYA SURFACES : APPLICATIONS TO TERRESTRIAL REMOTE SENSING AND VENUS DATA INTERPRETATION , 1993 .

[27]  Lisa R. Gaddis,et al.  Evaluation of an empirical radar backscatter model for predicting backscatter characteristics of geologic units at Pisgah Volcanic Field, California , 1994 .

[28]  D. Vidal-Madjar,et al.  The use of radar backscattering signals for measuring soil moisture and surface roughness , 1995 .

[29]  M. Shepard,et al.  Self‐affine (fractal) topography: Surface parameterization and radar scattering , 1995 .