Interpopulation differences exhibited by Spotted Bowerbirds Chlamydera maculata across a suite of male traits and female preferences

Male Spotted Bowerbirds Chlamydera maculata build and decorate structures, bowers, that act as targets for female choice. Bower construction, orientation and distribution all differed between two populations, as did rates of intrasexual aggression. Although there was a broad similarity in classes of decorations used on bowers, the exact types and positioning varied between populations. For two intensively studied populations, different decorations appeared to be the best predictors of mating success. In both populations, male owners of high-quality bowers obtained higher mating success. Male display intensity differed dramatically between populations, and females appeared to differ in the attention that they paid to the male's own display movements. Females also differed in the position that they took to observe a male's display. These variations suggest that differing selective forces may be acting on the elaboration of extreme male display traits across populations. I comment on how this variation can be used to illuminate current hypotheses for the evolution of bowers.

[1]  A. Goldizen,et al.  The multiple signals assessed by female satin bowerbirds: could they be used to narrow down females' choices of mates? , 2005, Biology Letters.

[2]  W. Amos,et al.  Neighbouring male spotted bowerbirds are not related, but do maraud each other , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  K. Dasmahapatra,et al.  Local traditions of bower decoration by spotted bowerbirds in a single population , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Cecilia Kopuchian,et al.  Temporal stability and change in a microgeographical pattern of song variation in the rufous-collared sparrow , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  G. Patricelli,et al.  Variable female preferences drive complex male displays , 2004, Nature.

[6]  A. Goldizen,et al.  Home-range sizes and bower visitation patterns of immature male Satin Bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) , 2004 .

[7]  J. Endler,et al.  Morphological signals of sex and status in Spotted Bowerbirds , 2004 .

[8]  A. Balmford,et al.  Spotted bowerbirds Chlamydera maculata do not prefer rare or costly bower decorations , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  M. Leal,et al.  Differences in Visual Signal Design and Detectability between Allopatric Populations of Anolis Lizards , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[10]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[11]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Multiple sexual ornaments in satin bowerbirds: ultraviolet plumage and bowers signal different aspects of male quality , 2003 .

[12]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Bower location and orientation in Satin Bowerbirds: optimising the conspicuousness of male display? , 2003 .

[13]  J. Madden Male spotted bowerbirds preferentially choose, arrange and proffer objects that are good predictors of mating success , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  J. Madden Bower decorations are good predictors of mating success in the spotted bowerbird , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  F. Kroon,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC SONG VARIATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES IN THE GOLDEN BOWERBIRD , 2002 .

[16]  J. Madden Bower decorations attract females but provoke other male spotted bowerbirds: bower owners resolve this trade-off , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  A. Miles,et al.  Bower location by the Spotted Bowerbird (Chlamydera maculata) , 2002 .

[18]  K. Hughes,et al.  A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  G. Patricelli,et al.  Sexual selection: Male displays adjusted to female's response , 2002, Nature.

[20]  T. Freeberg Culture and courtship in vertebrates: a review of social learning and transmission of courtship systems and mating patterns , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[21]  G. Borgia,et al.  Co–option of male courtship signals from aggressive display in bowerbirds , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  C. Parr,et al.  Randomization Analyses: Mimicry, Geographic Variation and Cultural Evolution of Song in Brood‐Parasitic Straw‐Tailed Whydahs, Vidua fischeri , 2000 .

[23]  G. Borgia,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION DRIVES RAPID DIVERGENCE IN BOWERBIRD DISPLAY TRAITS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Humphries,et al.  Bower‐building: coevolution of display traits in response to the costs of female choice? , 1999 .

[25]  T. Bakker,et al.  Sexual selection in sticklebacks in the field: correlates of reproductive, mating, and paternal success , 1999 .

[26]  G. Borgia,et al.  Coevolution of elaborated male display traits in the spotted bowerbird: an experimental test of the threat reduction hypothesis , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  D. Bell,et al.  Song learning and vocal tradition in Nuttall's white-crowned sparrows , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  P. Dwyer,et al.  The value of objects to Satin Bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus , 1997 .

[29]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[30]  P. Nicoletto,et al.  Consensus among females in their choice of males in the guppy Poecilia reticulata , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  B. Grant,et al.  CULTURAL INHERITANCE OF SONG AND ITS ROLE IN THE EVOLUTION OF DARWIN'S FINCHES , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  J. Travis,et al.  Inter-population variation in male mating behaviours in the sailfin mollie, Poecilia latipinna , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  G. Borgia Complex male display and female choice in the spotted bowerbird: specialized functions for different bower decorations , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  G. Borgia Threat Reduction as a Cause of Differences in Bower Architecture, Bower Decoration and Male Display in Two Closely-Related Bowerbirds Chlamydera nuchalis and C. maculata , 1995 .

[35]  S. Pruett-Jones,et al.  Sexual competition and courtship disruptions: why do male bowerbirds destroy each other's bowers? , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  N. Liley,et al.  Sexual selection and competitive mating success of males guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from four Trinidad populations , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  G. Borgia,et al.  Feather stealing in the satin bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): male competition and the quality of display , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  J. Diamond,et al.  Animal art: Variation in bower decorating style among male bowerbirds Amblyornis inornatus. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  G. Borgia Bower quality, number of decorations and mating success of male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): an experimental analysis , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  P. Marler,et al.  Culturally Transmitted Patterns of Vocal Behavior in Sparrows , 1964, Science.

[41]  J. Warham Field notes on Australian bower-birds and cat-birds. , 1962 .

[42]  J. Godin,et al.  Geographical variation in the male intromittent organ of the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2000 .

[43]  T. A. Jenssen,et al.  COMPARISONS OF TEMPORAL DISPLAY STRUCTURE ACROSS CONTEXTS AND POPULATIONS IN MALE ANOLIS CAROLINENSIS : SIGNAL STABILITY OR LABILITY? , 1999 .

[44]  U. Mueller,et al.  Bower Destruction, Decoration Stealing and Female Choice in the Spotted Bowerbird Chlamydera maculata , 1992 .

[45]  N. Chaffer The Spotted and Satin Bower-birds: A Comparison , 1945 .