Aging and strength of bone as a structural material

SummaryThere is a general, age-related reduction in the material strength and stiffness of bone in both men and women. Between the ages of 35 and 70, cortical bone strength in bending is diminished by about 15–20%, and cancellous bone strength in compression is reduced about 50%. In addition, bone becomes increasingly brittle and fractures with less energy. It is hypothesized that this tendency is driven by the need for remodeling to repair fatigue damage, and the fact that most osteonal and endotrabecular remodeling events fail to replace all the bone that they remove. Each remodeling event also introduces cement line interfaces, which although affording protection against fatigue failure, weaken bone for monotonic loading. Remodeling also affects collagen fiber orientation, mineralization, and the amount of unrepaired fatigue damage, which are additional determinants of bone strength and stiffness. Mechanical factors apparently inhibit age-related bone loss where stresses are higher by reducing remodeling rates and/or the deficit at each remodeling site. They may also stimulate modeling responses, primarily in the form of periosteal bone formation, which, in men more than women, alter bone size and shape to effectively compensate for loss of material strength. Suggested directions for future research include elucidation of the relationships between (1) histologically observable microcracks and bone fragility, (2) remodeling and the repair of fatigue damage, and (3) estrogen and other hormones and mechanically adaptive responses.

[1]  J. Currey,et al.  The mechanical consequences of variation in the mineral content of bone. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  E. Radin,et al.  Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[4]  J. Currey The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  W C Hayes,et al.  Compact bone fatigue damage: a microscopic examination. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  David B. Burr,et al.  Structure, Function, and Adaptation of Compact Bone , 1989 .

[7]  R. Vincentelli Relation between collagen fiber orientation and age of osteon formation in human tibial compact bone. , 1978, Acta anatomica.

[8]  R. Martin,et al.  Studies of skeletal remodeling in aging men. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  A. Burstein,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone , 1974 .

[11]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Mechanical properties and histology of cortical bone from younger and older men , 1976, The Anatomical Record.

[12]  J K Weaver,et al.  Cancellous bone: its strength and changes with aging and an evaluation of some methods for measuring its mineral content. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  R. Martin,et al.  The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bone strength. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  A. M. Parfitt,et al.  Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: Cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[15]  A. Parfitt,et al.  Plasma calcium control at quiescent bone surfaces: a new approach to the homeostatic function of bone lining cells. , 1989, Bone.

[16]  D A Smith,et al.  Relations between age, mineral density and mechanical properties of human femoral compacta. , 1976, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  E. Kerley,et al.  The microscopic determination of age in human bone. , 1965, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  W. Hayes,et al.  Sex differences in age‐related remodeling of the femur and tibia , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  R. Martin,et al.  Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals. , 1990, Bone.

[21]  J. Currey Physical characteristics affecting the tensile failure properties of compact bone. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  W C Hayes,et al.  Compact bone fatigue damage--I. Residual strength and stiffness. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  D R Carter,et al.  A cumulative damage model for bone fracture , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  Christopher B. Ruff,et al.  Sex differences in geometry of the femoral neck with aging: A structural analysis of bone mineral data , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[25]  F. Linde,et al.  X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  D. Burr,et al.  The effects of composition, structure and age on the torsional properties of the human radius. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  E. Simmons,et al.  Age‐related changes in the human femoral cortex , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  D. Burr,et al.  Validity of the bulk-staining technique to separate artifactual from in vivo bone microdamage. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  J. Mcelhaney,et al.  Mechanical properties on cranial bone. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  A. Parfitt,et al.  Bone remodeling. , 1988, Henry Ford Hospital medical journal.

[31]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[32]  R. Amprino,et al.  Processi di ricostruzione e di riassorbimento nella sostanza compatta delle ossa dell'uomo , 1936, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[33]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. , 1986, Bone.

[34]  Richmond W. Smith,et al.  Femoral Expansion in Aging Women: Implications for Osteoporosis and Fractures , 1964, Science.

[35]  H. Frost A new direction for osteoporosis research: a review and proposal. , 1991, Bone.

[36]  G. H. Bell,et al.  Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis , 2005, Calcified Tissue Research.

[37]  D. Dahlin,et al.  Bone Remodeling Dynamics , 1964 .

[38]  M. Singh,et al.  Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure--biomechanical consequences. , 1989, Bone.

[40]  D. Burr,et al.  Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Relations of the compressive properties of human cortical bone to histological structure and calcification. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  R Vincentelli,et al.  The effect of Haversian remodeling on the tensile properties of human cortical bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  A Ascenzi,et al.  Distribution of osteonic and interstitial components in the human femoral shaft with reference to structure, calcification and mechanical properties. , 1983, Acta anatomica.