Identification of the Docking Site for CD3 on the T Cell Receptor β Chain by Solution NMR*

Background: Understanding T cell signaling requires knowing the structure of the TCR-CD3 complex. Results: Solution NMR was used to identify the docking site for CD3 ectodomains on the TCR β chain. Conclusion: The docking site (∼400 Å2) comprises ∼10 Cβ residues at the base of the TCR. Significance: CD3 is located opposite to the peptide-MHC binding site of the TCR. The T cell receptor (TCR)-CD3 complex is composed of a genetically diverse αβ TCR heterodimer associated noncovalently with the invariant CD3 dimers CD3ϵγ, CD3ϵδ, and CD3ζζ. The TCR mediates peptide-MHC recognition, whereas the CD3 molecules transduce activation signals to the T cell. Although much is known about downstream T cell signaling pathways, the mechanism whereby TCR engagement by peptide-MHC initiates signaling is poorly understood. A key to solving this problem is defining the spatial organization of the TCR-CD3 complex and the interactions between its subunits. We have applied solution NMR methods to identify the docking site for CD3 on the β chain of a human autoimmune TCR. We demonstrate a low affinity but highly specific interaction between the extracellular domains of CD3 and the TCR constant β (Cβ) domain that requires both CD3ϵγ and CD3ϵδ subunits. The mainly hydrophilic docking site, comprising 9–11 solvent-accessible Cβ residues, is relatively small (∼400 Å2), consistent with the weak interaction between TCR and CD3 extracellular domains, and devoid of glycosylation sites. The docking site is centered on the αA and αB helices of Cβ, which are located at the base of the TCR. This positions CD3ϵγ and CD3ϵδ between the TCR and the T cell membrane, permitting us to distinguish among several possible models of TCR-CD3 association. We further correlate structural results from NMR with mutational data on TCR-CD3 interactions from cell-based assays.

[1]  H. Badgandi,et al.  Piecing together the family portrait of TCR‐CD3 complexes , 2012, Immunological reviews.

[2]  D. Keskin,et al.  Constitutively Oxidized CXXC Motifs within the CD3 Heterodimeric Ectodomains of the T Cell Receptor Complex Enforce the Conformation of Juxtaposed Segments* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  J. Holst,et al.  Rapid analysis of T-cell selection in vivo using T cell–receptor retrogenic mice , 2006, Nature Methods.

[4]  An artificially evolved albumin binding module facilitates chemical shift epitope mapping of GA domain interactions with phylogenetically diverse albumins , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[6]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  TCR Signaling Emerges from the Sum of Many Parts , 2012, Front. Immun..

[7]  Martin Wiedmann,et al.  The Organizing Principle in the Formation of the T Cell Receptor-CD3 Complex , 2002, Cell.

[8]  James McCluskey,et al.  T cell antigen receptor recognition of antigen-presenting molecules. , 2015, Annual review of immunology.

[9]  E. Palmer,et al.  A motif within the T cell receptor α-chain constant region connecting peptide domain controls antigen responsiveness , 1997 .

[10]  V. Hilser,et al.  The ensemble nature of allostery , 2014, Nature.

[11]  Roland Martin,et al.  Structure of a TCR with high affinity for self‐antigen reveals basis for escape from negative selection , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[12]  L. Samelson,et al.  Signal transduction mediated by the T cell antigen receptor: the role of adapter proteins. , 2002, Annual review of immunology.

[13]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Deconstructing the form and function of the TCR/CD3 complex. , 2006, Immunity.

[14]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  Application of iterative soft thresholding for fast reconstruction of NMR data non-uniformly sampled with multidimensional Poisson Gap scheduling , 2012, Journal of Biomolecular NMR.

[15]  Harvir Singh,et al.  Scalable signaling mediated by T cell antigen receptor–CD3 ITAMs ensures effective negative selection and prevents autoimmunity , 2008, Nature Immunology.

[16]  Meir Glick,et al.  Stable, soluble T-cell receptor molecules for crystallization and therapeutics. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[17]  K. Garcia,et al.  Molecular architecture of the αβ T cell receptor–CD3 complex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  P. Marrack,et al.  A Conserved CXXC Motif in CD3ε Is Critical for T Cell Development and TCR Signaling , 2009, PLoS biology.

[19]  Jeff Holst,et al.  Generation of T-cell receptor retrogenic mice , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[20]  R. Mariuzza,et al.  Structural and Biophysical Insights into the Role of CD4 and CD8 in T Cell Activation , 2013, Front. Immunol..

[21]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Evidence for a functional sidedness to the αβTCR , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Sending Signals Dynamically , 2009, Science.

[23]  S. Ludwin,et al.  Unique Clinical and Pathological Features in HLA-DRB1*0401–restricted MBP 111–129–specific Humanized TCR Transgenic Mice , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[24]  Robyn L Stanfield,et al.  How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors. , 2006, Annual review of immunology.

[25]  S. Tzeng,et al.  Protein activity regulation by conformational entropy , 2012, Nature.

[26]  A. Ortiz,et al.  Cooperativity Between T Cell Receptor Complexes Revealed by Conformational Mutants of CD3ɛ , 2009, Science Signaling.

[27]  D. Wishart,et al.  The 13C Chemical-Shift Index: A simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13C chemical-shift data , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[28]  R. Mariuzza,et al.  Crystal structure of a complete ternary complex of T-cell receptor, peptide–MHC, and CD4 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  L. Kay,et al.  Four-dimensional NMR spectroscopy of a 723-residue protein: chemical shift assignments and secondary structure of malate synthase g. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  S. Harrison,et al.  Crystal structure of a human CD3-ε/δ dimer in complex with a UCHT1 single-chain antibody fragment , 2004 .

[31]  Charalampos G. Kalodimos,et al.  Protein dynamics and allostery: an NMR view. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[32]  T. Beddoe,et al.  Crystal structure of the human T cell receptor CD3εγ heterodimer complexed to the therapeutic mAb OKT3 , 2004 .

[33]  K. Wucherpfennig,et al.  Structural biology of the T-cell receptor: insights into receptor assembly, ligand recognition, and initiation of signaling. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[34]  E. Palmer,et al.  A motif within the T cell receptor alpha chain constant region connecting peptide domain controls antigen responsiveness. , 1996, Immunity.

[35]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Disruption of extracellular interactions impairs T cell receptor-CD3 complex stability and signaling. , 2007, Immunity.

[36]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  R. Mariuzza,et al.  Structural basis for self‐recognition by autoimmune T‐cell receptors , 2012, Immunological reviews.

[38]  R. Riek,et al.  Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  K. Wucherpfennig,et al.  A Membrane-proximal Tetracysteine Motif Contributes to Assembly of CD3δϵ and CD3γϵ Dimers with the T Cell Receptor* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer , 2001, Cell.

[42]  K. Wucherpfennig,et al.  Stoichiometry of the T‐cell receptor–CD3 complex and key intermediates assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[43]  A. Bax,et al.  TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts , 2009, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[44]  E. Reinherz,et al.  The TCR Cβ FG Loop Regulates αβ T Cell Development1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[45]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[46]  Smaroula Dilioglou,et al.  Correction of multi-gene deficiency in vivo using a single 'self-cleaving' 2A peptide–based retroviral vector , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[47]  Philippa Marrack,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved amino acids that control TCR-MHC interaction. , 2008, Annual review of immunology.

[48]  I. Wilson,et al.  T Cell Receptors are Structures Capable of Initiating Signaling in the Absence of Large Conformational Rearrangements , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  Solution structure of the CD3εδ ectodomain and comparison with CD3εγ as a basis for modeling T cell receptor topology and signaling , 2004 .

[50]  Michael E Birnbaum,et al.  Diversity‐oriented approaches for interrogating T‐cell receptor repertoire, ligand recognition, and function , 2012, Immunological reviews.