New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: when a robotic hand becomes one’s own

The rubber hand illusion is an experimental paradigm in which participants consider a fake hand to be part of their body. This paradigm has been used in many domains of psychology (i.e., research on pain, body ownership, agency) and is of clinical importance. The classic rubber hand paradigm nevertheless suffers from limitations, such as the absence of active motion or the reliance on approximate measurements, which makes strict experimental conditions difficult to obtain. Here, we report on the development of a novel technology—a robotic, user- and computer-controllable hand—that addresses many of the limitations associated with the classic rubber hand paradigm. Because participants can actively control the robotic hand, the device affords higher realism and authenticity. Our robotic hand has a comparatively low cost and opens up novel and innovative methods. In order to validate the robotic hand, we have carried out three experiments. The first two studies were based on previous research using the rubber hand, while the third was specific to the robotic hand. We measured both sense of agency and ownership. Overall, results show that participants experienced a “robotic hand illusion” in the baseline conditions. Furthermore, we also replicated previous results about agency and ownership.

[1]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Experimenter Bias, Anxiety, and Social Desirability , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  C. Tart,et al.  Experimenter Bias in Hypnotist Performance , 1964, Science.

[3]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF EXPERIMENTER BIAS ON THE OPERANT LEARNING OF LABORATORY RATS. , 1964, Journal of psychiatric research.

[4]  Theodore Xenophon Barber,et al.  Fact, fiction, and the experimenter bias effect. , 1968 .

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[6]  S. Gallagher Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  M S Graziano,et al.  Coding the location of the arm by sight. , 2000, Science.

[8]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Hands for dexterous manipulation and robust grasping: a difficult road toward simplicity , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  William Townsend,et al.  The BarrettHand grasper – programmably flexible part handling and assembly , 2000 .

[10]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Sense of body and sense of action both contribute to self-recognition , 2002, Cognition.

[11]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  Awareness of somatic events associated with a voluntary action , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Hugo Elias,et al.  The Shadow robot mimics human actions , 2003, Ind. Robot.

[15]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[16]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition , 2005, Cognition.

[17]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[19]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  S. Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  D. Lloyd Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Is That Near My Hand? Multisensory Representation of Peripersonal Space in Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interface systems: progress and prospects , 2007, Expert review of medical devices.

[24]  P. Haggard,et al.  Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  W. IJsselsteijn,et al.  The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. , 2008, Body image.

[26]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Behavioural Brain Research , 1999 .

[27]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  What is embodiment? A psychometric approach , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  R. Bartha,et al.  Ventricular enlargement as a possible measure of Alzheimer's disease progression validated using the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative database. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  C. Spence,et al.  Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  The initial design and manufacturing process of a low cost hand for the robot iCub , 2008, Humanoids 2008 - 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[32]  C. Moore,et al.  Movement and the Rubber Hand Illusion , 2009, Perception.

[33]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Keeping in Touch with One's Self: Multisensory Mechanisms of Self-Consciousness , 2009, PloS one.

[34]  K. Hiraki,et al.  Rubber Hand Illusion under Delayed Visual Feedback , 2009, PloS one.

[35]  Subliminal behavioural priming: It's all in the brain, but whose brain? , 2009 .

[36]  Peter Aldhous,et al.  Illusion could give prosthetics a sense of touch , 2009 .

[37]  M. Tsakiris My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Multifingered robot hands: Control for grasping and manipulation , 2010, Annu. Rev. Control..

[39]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[41]  Regine Zopf,et al.  Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  On motion and force controllability of grasping hands with postural synergies , 2010, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[43]  Henning Holle,et al.  Proprioceptive drift without illusions of ownership for rotated hands in the “rubber hand illusion” paradigm , 2011, Cognitive neuroscience.

[44]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The DLR hand arm system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[45]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  Just a heartbeat away from one's body: interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Elizabeth A. Franz,et al.  The rubber hand illusion and its application to clinical neuroscience , 2011, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[47]  Massimiliano Di Luca,et al.  The Rubber Hand Illusion: Feeling of Ownership and Proprioceptive Drift Do Not Go Hand in Hand , 2011, PloS one.

[48]  G. Moseley,et al.  The rubber hand illusion increases histamine reactivity in the real arm , 2011, Current Biology.

[49]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Moving a Rubber Hand that Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[50]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[51]  Dieter Kleinböhl,et al.  Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Georgios A. Keliris,et al.  Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Behavioral Priming: It's All in the Mind, but Whose Mind? , 2012, PloS one.

[54]  Oskar von Stryk,et al.  Prosthesis-user-in-the-loop: User-centered design parameters and visual simulation , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[55]  Oskar von Stryk,et al.  Design and control of a robot for the assessment of psychological factors in prosthetic development , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[56]  Willem F. G. Haselager,et al.  Did I Do That? Brain–Computer Interfacing and the Sense of Agency , 2012, Minds and Machines.

[57]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  The role of the temporal lobe in contextual sentence integration: A single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[58]  Gianluca Palli,et al.  Development of the UB Hand IV: Overview of Design Solutions and Enabling Technologies , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[59]  Giovanni Gentile,et al.  The Invisible Hand Illusion: Multisensory Integration Leads to the Embodiment of a Discrete Volume of Empty Space , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Joost Geeroms,et al.  Ankle-Knee prosthesis with powered ankle and energy transfer for CYBERLEGs α-prototype , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[61]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Anatomically plausible illusory posture affects mental rotation of body parts , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[62]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Design and Validation of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic (AMP-) Foot 2.0 , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.