Potential of Short Rotation Coppice plantations to reinforce functional biodiversity in agricultural landscapes

Abstract We compared communities of vascular plants and arthropods in ten Short Rotation Coppice (SRC)–maize pairs, to (1) quantify the difference in diversity and composition between these two alternative land-use types and (2) to assess the potential of SRC plantations to increase functional biodiversity values in agricultural landscapes. In each SRC plantation and maize field, the vegetation was surveyed and arthropods were sampled by applying pitfall and pan trapping. The composition of the vegetation and of the epigeic and vegetation inhabiting arthropod communities strongly differed between the crop types. This differentiation was mainly due to true species turnover and only to a lesser extent to the occurrence of nested subsets. On average, the total cover of the vegetation was 10 times higher in the SRC plantations and taxonomic and trait diversity were also consistently higher in SRC. Arthropod activity densities were significantly higher, sometimes almost double, in SRC plantations. Significantly higher effective species numbers in SRC were only retrieved for Hymenoptera and Coleoptera. Regarding functional groups, the activity densities of omnivores, detritivores, mycophages, phytophages and parasitoids were significantly higher in SRC. While activity densities of predators were not different among the crop types, their effective species number was higher in SRC, indicating a more evenly distributed and diverse predator community. To conclude, we have shown that SRC can significantly increase vegetation and arthropod abundance and/or diversity in agricultural landscapes when replacing annual biomass crops, such as maize.

[1]  A. Hof,et al.  The impact of grassy field margins on macro-invertebrate abundance in adjacent arable fields. , 2010 .

[2]  A. Bolte,et al.  High value of short rotation coppice plantations for phytodiversity in rural landscapes , 2012 .

[3]  K. Thompson,et al.  The Electronic Comparative Plant Ecology , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[4]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Biomass yield and energy balance of a short-rotation poplar coppice with multiple clones on degraded land during 16 years , 2013 .

[5]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy production from poplar and willow: a review , 2011 .

[6]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Jason M. Evans,et al.  Biodiversity conservation in the era of biofuels: risks and opportunities , 2011 .

[8]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .

[9]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[10]  L. Jost Entropy and diversity , 2006 .

[11]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale , 2007 .

[12]  Donatella Zona,et al.  Energy and climate benefits of bioelectricity from low-input short rotation woody crops on agricultural land over a two-year rotation , 2013 .

[13]  T. Benton,et al.  Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? , 2003 .

[14]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  The impact of biomass crop cultivation on temperate biodiversity , 2010 .

[15]  Timothy D. Meehan,et al.  Agricultural landscape simplification and insecticide use in the Midwestern United States , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Predator diversity and trophic interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[17]  A. Baselga Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity , 2010 .

[18]  Y. Clough,et al.  On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Carsten Thies,et al.  REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[20]  M. Groom,et al.  Biofuels and Biodiversity: Principles for Creating Better Policies for Biofuel Production , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[21]  M. Brändle,et al.  Species richness of insects and mites on trees: expanding Southwood , 2001 .

[22]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline? , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  W. V. Landuyt,et al.  Herziening van de indeling in ecologische soortengroepen voor Nederland en Vlaanderen , 2004 .

[24]  R. Costanza Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed , 2008 .

[25]  D. P. Giga Methods in Ecological and Agricultural Entomology , 1997 .

[26]  M. Altieri The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems , 1999 .

[27]  L. Jackson,et al.  Special Issue Article: Advancing Environmental Conservation: Essays In Honor Of Navjot Sodhi Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification , 2012 .

[28]  S. Butler,et al.  Farmland Biodiversity and the Footprint of Agriculture , 2007, Science.

[29]  T. Cooper,et al.  Funding for Farmland Biodiversity in the EU: Gaining Evidence for the EU Budget Review , 2008 .

[30]  Genevieve Patenaude,et al.  The economics of short rotation coppice in Germany , 2012 .

[31]  D. Bonte,et al.  Sand dynamics in coastal dune landscapes constrain diversity and life-history characteristics of spiders , 2006 .

[32]  Wouter Van Landuyt,et al.  Rode lijst van de vaatplanten van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest , 2006 .

[33]  M. Weih,et al.  Influence of young poplar stands on floristic diversity in agricultural landscapes (Sweden) , 2003 .

[34]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Evaluating ecosystem processes in willow short rotation coppice bioenergy plantations , 2013 .

[35]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment , 2011 .

[36]  M. Glemnitz,et al.  Can short-rotation coppice strips compensate structural deficits in agrarian landscapes? , 2013 .

[37]  M. Emmerson,et al.  The relationship between agricultural intensification and biological control: experimental tests across Europe. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.