Quality Control of Structural MRI Images Applied Using FreeSurfer—A Hands-On Workflow to Rate Motion Artifacts

In structural magnetic resonance imaging motion artifacts are common, especially when not scanning healthy young adults. It has been shown that motion affects the analysis with automated image-processing techniques (e.g., FreeSurfer). This can bias results. Several developmental and adult studies have found reduced volume and thickness of gray matter due to motion artifacts. Thus, quality control is necessary in order to ensure an acceptable level of quality and to define exclusion criteria of images (i.e., determine participants with most severe artifacts). However, information about the quality control workflow and image exclusion procedure is largely lacking in the current literature and the existing rating systems differ. Here, we propose a stringent workflow of quality control steps during and after acquisition of T1-weighted images, which enables researchers dealing with populations that are typically affected by motion artifacts to enhance data quality and maximize sample sizes. As an underlying aim we established a thorough quality control rating system for T1-weighted images and applied it to the analysis of developmental clinical data using the automated processing pipeline FreeSurfer. This hands-on workflow and quality control rating system will aid researchers in minimizing motion artifacts in the final data set, and therefore enhance the quality of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies.

[1]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Stine K. Krogsrud,et al.  Development and aging of cortical thickness correspond to genetic organization patterns , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Heath R. Pardoe,et al.  Motion and morphometry in clinical and nonclinical populations , 2016, NeuroImage.

[4]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Distributed grey and white matter deficits in hyperkinetic disorder: MRI evidence for anatomical abnormality in an attentional network , 2001, Psychological Medicine.

[5]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Trajectories of cortical thickness maturation in normal brain development — The importance of quality control procedures , 2016, NeuroImage.

[7]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[8]  Katherine E Henson,et al.  Risk of Suicide After Cancer Diagnosis in England , 2018, JAMA psychiatry.

[9]  M. Dylan Tisdall,et al.  Head motion during MRI acquisition reduces gray matter volume and thickness estimates , 2015, NeuroImage.

[10]  Marko Wilke,et al.  Assessment of spatial normalization of whole‐brain magnetic resonance images in children , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Elna-Marie Larsson,et al.  It's like being in another world--patients' lived experience of magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, Journal of clinical nursing.

[12]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Prospective motion correction of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data in children , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Developmental trajectories of brain volume abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2002, JAMA.

[14]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Prospective motion correction in brain imaging: A review , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  M. Dylan Tisdall,et al.  Prospective motion correction with volumetric navigators (vNavs) reduces the bias and variance in brain morphometry induced by subject motion , 2016, NeuroImage.

[16]  Elias Gedamu,et al.  Guidelines for Developing Automated Quality Control Procedures for Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Acquired in Multi-Centre Clinical Trials , 2011 .

[17]  K. Slifer,et al.  Operant-contingency-based preparation of children for functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  Krisztina L. Malisza,et al.  Training Children to Reduce Motion and Increase Success of MRI Scanning , 2010 .

[19]  Deborah Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Reduced insular volume in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder , 2012, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[20]  E M Haacke,et al.  MR artifacts: a review. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  A. Reiss,et al.  Assessment and prevention of head motion during imaging of patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder , 2007, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[22]  A. Dale,et al.  Prospective motion correction improves diagnostic utility of pediatric MRI scans , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[23]  Luca Passamonti,et al.  Brain structure abnormalities in early-onset and adolescent-onset conduct disorder. , 2011, The American journal of psychiatry.

[24]  Luca Passamonti,et al.  Brain structure abnormalities in adolescent girls with conduct disorder , 2012, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[25]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neural correlates of altered sensorimotor gating in boys with Tourette Syndrome: A combined EMG/fMRI study , 2016, The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  Jay N. Giedd,et al.  Motion Artifact in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Automated Analysis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. Zaitsev,et al.  Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutions , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Scott L. Rauch Neuroimaging and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in the 21st Century: What to Consider and How to Proceed , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[29]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  The macrostructural and microstructural abnormalities of corpus callosum in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A combined morphometric and diffusion tensor MRI study , 2010, Brain Research.

[30]  J. Giedd,et al.  Subtle in‐scanner motion biases automated measurement of brain anatomy from in vivo MRI , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  M. L. Wood,et al.  MR image artifacts from periodic motion. , 1985, Medical physics.

[33]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Volumetric navigators for prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Morphometric brain abnormalities in boys with conduct disorder. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[35]  Zuhong Lu,et al.  Gender versus brain size effects on subcortical gray matter volumes in the human brain , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  Stewart H. Mostofsky,et al.  Distinct frontal lobe morphology in girls and boys with ADHD , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.