Sutural bone deposition rate and strain magnitude during cranial development.

It is widely believed that rapid growth of the human brain generates tensile strain in cranial sutures, and that this strain influences the rate of bone deposition at the sutural margins during development. We developed general theoretical techniques for estimating sutural bone deposition rate and strain magnitude during mammalian cranial development. A geometry-based analysis was developed to estimate sutural bone deposition rate. A quasi-static stress analysis was developed to estimate sutural strain magnitude. We applied these techniques to the special case of normal cranial development in humans. The results of the bone deposition rate analysis indicate that average human sutural bone deposition rate is on the order of 100 microm/day at 1 month of age and decreases in an approximately exponential fashion during the first 4 years of life. The results of the strain analysis indicate that sutural strain magnitude is highly dependent on the assumed stiffness of the sutures, with estimated strain at 1 month of age ranging from approximately 20 to 400 microstrain. Regardless of the assumed stiffness of the sutures, the results indicate that sutural strain magnitude is small and decreases in an approximately exponential fashion during the first 4 years of life. The finding that both sutural bone deposition rate and strain magnitude decrease with increasing age is consistent with quasi-static tensile strain in sutures influencing sutural osteoblast activity in a dose-dependent manner. However, the small magnitude of the predicted strains suggests that tissue level strains in sutures may be too small to directly influence osteoblast biology. In light of these results, we suggest other biomechanical mechanisms, such as a tension-induced angiogenic environment in the sutures or mechanotransduction in the underlying dura mater, through which tension across sutures may regulate the rate of bone deposition in sutures.

[1]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Midface Distraction Advancement in the Canine Without Osteotomies , 1995, Annals of plastic surgery.

[2]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Periodontal ligament cell populations: The central role of fibroblasts in creating a unique tissue , 1996, The Anatomical record.

[3]  M. Longaker,et al.  Co-culture of osteoblasts with immature dural cells causes an increased rate and degree of osteoblast differentiation. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  M. Cohen,et al.  Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis. , 1993, American journal of medical genetics.

[5]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Studies in Cranial Suture Biology: Regional Dura Mater Determines Overlying Suture Biology , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  R. Song,et al.  Sutural Expansion Osteogenesis for Management of the Bony-Tissue Defect in Cleft Palate Repair: Experimental Studies in Dogs , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  M H Moore,et al.  CT-determined intracranial volume for a normal population. , 2000, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[8]  S W Herring,et al.  Strain in the braincase and its sutures during function. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  D R Carter,et al.  Mechanical induction in limb morphogenesis: the role of growth-generated strains and pressures. , 2002, Bone.

[11]  S. Margulies,et al.  Infant skull and suture properties: measurements and implications for mechanisms of pediatric brain injury. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  M. Longaker,et al.  Mechanical Strain Affects Dura Mater Biological Processes: Implications for Immature Calvarial Healing , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  M. Longaker,et al.  Equibiaxial Tensile Strain Affects Calvarial Osteoblast Biology , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[14]  W. Roberts,et al.  Angiogenesis and osteogenesis in an orthopedically expanded suture. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  M. Massler,et al.  The growth pattern of the cranial vault in the albino rat as measured by vital staining with alizarine red “s” , 1951, The Anatomical record.

[16]  J. Huxley Problems of relative growth , 1932 .

[17]  P. Manson,et al.  Successful distraction osteogenesis across a growing cranial suture without an osteotomy. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  M. Schaffler,et al.  Prevention of fracture healing in rats by an inhibitor of angiogenesis. , 2001, Bone.

[19]  A. Whitelaw,et al.  Normal Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in the Newborn , 1986, Neuropediatrics.

[20]  W. E. Roberts,et al.  Cellular response to orthodontic force. , 1981, Dental clinics of North America.

[21]  M. Depew,et al.  19 – Craniofacial Development , 2002 .

[22]  Hideo Mitani,et al.  Periodontal Ligament Cells Under Mechanical Stress Induce Osteoclastogenesis by Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor κB Ligand Up‐Regulation via Prostaglandin E2 Synthesis , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  Jack C. Yu,et al.  Extrinsic Tension Results in FGF-2 Release, Membrane Permeability Change, and Intracellular Ca ++ Increase in Immature Cranial Sutures , 2001, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[24]  S. Miyawaki,et al.  The morphologic and biochemical effects of tensile force application to the interparietal suture of the Sprague-Dawley rat. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  C. Hansman,et al.  Growth of interorbital distance and skull thickness as observed in roentgenographic measurements. , 1966, Radiology.

[26]  R. Nanda,et al.  Effect of tensile force magnitude on release of cranial suture cells into S phase. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[27]  D. Pashley,et al.  The load-displacement characteristics of neonatal rat cranial sutures. , 2000, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[28]  R A Brand,et al.  Primary adult human bone cells do not respond to tissue (continuum) level strains , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.