Co-creative Practices in Service Innovation

This chapter is about co-creative practices that can be used for the purpose of service innovation. It starts with an introduction to our core assumption that innovation is a deliberate activity and can be enabled and triggered through staged co-creative practices. The main reasons for co-creative practices are first, bringing different people together to share, make sense and to collaborate, and secondly, to rethink current and explore future possibilities. In line with Kelley’s ideology, “You can prototype just about anything. What counts is moving the ball forward, achieving some part of your goal”. We highlight the open-ended exploration practices familiar to designers, in which the practice of identifying problems goes hand in hand with creating solutions. The basis for exploration in this chapter is in engaging people in reflective and creative dialogues, and to situate activities in order to set frames for reflection. In practice, the co-creative practices emerge and evolve in a non-linear progress of stages that are partly overlapping and in relation with each other. This chapter, however, is organised through the use of four lenses: (1) insight generation, (2) concept exploration and development, (3) converging towards a specification and (4) transformative and implementation processes. The chapter introduces a number of examples and applied co-creative practices from various fields of service design. They address the co-creative character of many well-known tools such as role playing, context mapping, design games and experience prototyping. Finally, the chapter sums up the main considerations for the applications of co-creative practices, defining the purpose, utilising co-creative characters and developing facilitation capacity.

[1]  E. Wenger,et al.  Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[2]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[3]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future , 1992 .

[4]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  From System Descriptions to Scripts for Action , 1992 .

[5]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Projected realities: conceptual design for cultural effect , 1999, CHI '99.

[6]  Steve Sato,et al.  Methods & tools: Playacting and focus troupes:: theater techniques for creating quick, intense, immersive, and engaging focus group sessions , 1999, INTR.

[7]  Eva Brandt,et al.  Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design , 2000 .

[8]  Giulio Jacucci,et al.  On the move with a magic thing: role playing in concept design of mobile services and devices , 2000, DIS '00.

[9]  Jane Fulton Suri,et al.  Experience prototyping , 2000, DIS '00.

[10]  Eva Brandt Event driven product development – collaboration and learning , 2001 .

[11]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  Virtuosos of the Experience Domain , 2001 .

[12]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Understanding contexts by being there: case studies in bodystorming , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[13]  Dag Svanæs,et al.  Putting the users center stage: role playing and low-fi prototyping enable end users to design mobile systems , 2004, CHI.

[14]  Jörn Messeter,et al.  Facilitating collaboration through design games , 2004, PDC 04.

[15]  Tuuli Mattelmäki,et al.  Applying probes – from inspirational notes to collaborative insights , 2005 .

[16]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Contextmapping: experiences from practice , 2005 .

[17]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Bringing design to services , 2006 .

[18]  Johan Roos,et al.  Thinking from within : a hands-on strategy practice , 2006 .

[19]  Eva Brandt,et al.  Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design? , 2006, PDC '06.

[20]  Tuuli Mattelmäki,et al.  Collaborative design exploration: envisioning future practices with make tools , 2007, DPPI.

[21]  Thomas Binder WHY DESIGN:LABS? , 2007 .

[22]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Sharing User Experiences in the Product Innovation Process: Participatory Design Needs Participatory Communication , 2007 .

[23]  Tuuli Mattelmäki,et al.  Active@work - design dealing with social change , 2007 .

[24]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[25]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Empathy and experience in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[26]  C. Grönroos Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co‐creates? , 2008 .

[27]  Markku Reunanen,et al.  Role Playing and Collaborative Scenario Design Development , 2009 .

[28]  Mervi Hasu,et al.  Creating Mock-ups of Strategic Partnerships , 2009 .

[29]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Speed sketching with designers : User inspired brainstorming , 2009 .

[30]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  A customer‐dominant logic of service , 2010 .

[31]  Merlijn Kouprie,et al.  A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user's life , 2009 .

[32]  Gry Seland,et al.  Empowering End Users in Design of Mobile Technology Using Role Play as a Method: Reflections on the Role-Play Conduction , 2009, HCI.

[33]  F. Sleeswijk Visser,et al.  Bringing the everyday life of people into design , 2009 .

[34]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Examplars in Service Design , 2009 .

[35]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Participative, co-operative, emancipatory : From participatory design to service design , 2012 .

[36]  A. A. Lucero Vera,et al.  Co-designing interactive spaces for and with designers : supporting mood-board making , 2009 .

[37]  Fabian Segelström,et al.  Visualisations in Service Design , 2010 .

[38]  Tom Kelley,et al.  Prototyping is the shorthand of innovation , 2010 .

[39]  C. Grönroos,et al.  Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing , 2011 .

[40]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Service Design Visualisations meet Service Theory : Strengths, weaknesses and perspectives , 2011 .

[41]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Transformative Services and Transformation Design , 2011 .

[42]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Design for Services , 2011 .

[43]  Anna Salmi,et al.  Co-designing (with) organizations: human-centeredness, participation and embodiment in organizational development , 2011, DPPI.

[44]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Existing Prototyping Perspectives: Considerations for service design , 2011, Nordes 2011: Making Design Matter.

[45]  F. Visser,et al.  Lost in CO-X - Interpretations of Co-Design and Co-Creation , 2011 .

[46]  Tuuli Mattelmäki,et al.  Towards customer centric services; Suspension of expectations and trust , 2011 .

[47]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Investigating Prototyping Practices of Service Designers from a Service Logic Perspective , 2011 .

[48]  Eva Brandt,et al.  On designing open-ended interpretations for collaborative design exploration , 2011 .

[49]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Service Designers on Including Stakeholders in Service Prototyping , 2011 .

[50]  Tuuli Mattelmäki,et al.  Storytelling Group – a co-design method for service design , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[51]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Service Walkthroughs to Support Service Development , 2013 .

[52]  Kirsikka Vaajakallio,et al.  Design games as a tool, a mindset and a structure , 2012 .

[53]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Designing for Resourcefulness in Service : Some Assumptions and Consequences , 2012 .

[54]  Daria Cantù,et al.  Creating Scenarios for Regional Projects: Service design for multifunctional and collaborative food networks , 2012 .

[55]  Johan Blomkvist,et al.  Conceptualisations of Service Prototyping : Service Sketches, Walkthroughs and Live Service Prototypes , 2012 .

[56]  Mette Agger Eriksen Material matters in co-designing : formatting & staging with participating materials in co-design projects, events & situations , 2012 .

[57]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  A Service Walkthrough in Astrid Lindgren's Footsteps , 2012 .

[58]  Teemu Leinonen,et al.  Cardboard hospital: Prototyping patient-centric environments and services , 2013, Nordes 2013: Experiments in Design Research.

[59]  C. Grönroos,et al.  Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation , 2013 .

[60]  Fabian Segelström,et al.  Benefits of External Representations in Service Design: A Distributed Cognition Perspective , 2014 .

[61]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Convivial Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design , 2013 .

[62]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Oops! moments: Kinetic material in participatory workshops , 2013, Nordes 2013: Experiments in Design Research.

[63]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Formative Evaluation of IT-based Services: A Case Study of a Meal Planning Service , 2014, Interact. Comput..

[64]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  One approach to understand design's value under a service logic , 2014 .