Evaluating the Impacts of Biomass Feedstock Transportation on Air Quality: A Tennessee Case Study

The efficiency of supply chain system of lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) feedstock is crucial to the development of the cellulosic biofuel industry. Moreover, the potential environmental impact of LCB feedstock transportation has also received increasing attention lately. This study first applied a spatial-oriented mixed-integer mathematical programming model linked to a GIS resource model to generate a least-cost solution of alternative typical feedstock supply chain systems for a potential commercial scale biorefinery per year in east, central and west Tennessee. The EPA’s MOVES model was then used to estimate the baseline emissions for 2010 in the study region and additional emissions generated from hauling feedstock. Results showed that switchgrass is more suitable than energy sorghum for biofuel production in Tennessee based on feedstock plant-gate cost and hauling emissions. Also, the large square bale system outperformed the large round bale system in both economic and environmental indicators. Finally, the biorefinery with the most economic feedstock cost and the least feedstock hauling emission is suggested to be sited in Robertson County, TN. The emissions of NOx, CO2, PM10, and PM2.5 from feedstock hauling in related counties increased by 0.12%, 0.04%, 0.15%, and 0.18%, respectively, when comparing with the emissions produced by existing overall traffics.

[1]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  Supply chain and logistics issues of bio-energy production. , 2011 .

[2]  Michael Wang,et al.  Effects of Fuel Ethanol Use on Fuel-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 1999 .

[3]  P. Flynn,et al.  Rail vs truck transport of biomass. , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[4]  A. F. Turhollow,et al.  Biomass Densification - Cubing Operations and Costs for Corn Stover , 2004 .

[5]  Patricia Thornley,et al.  Airborne emissions from biomass based power generation systems , 2008 .

[6]  James A. Larson,et al.  Yield and Breakeven Price of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass for Biofuels in Tennessee , 2009 .

[7]  B. English,et al.  Cost evaluation of alternative switchgrass producing, harvesting, storing, and transporting systems and their logistics in the Southeastern USA , 2010 .

[8]  B. English,et al.  Effect of dry matter loss on profitability of outdoor storage of switchgrass , 2012 .

[9]  S. Osborne Energy in 2020: Assessing the Economic Effects of Commercialization of Cellulosic Ethanol , 2007 .

[10]  Francis M. Epplin,et al.  Economics of a coordinated biorefinery feedstock harvest system: lignocellulosic biomass harvest cost , 2004 .

[11]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[12]  Bradly Wilson,et al.  Modeling Cellulosic Ethanol Plant Location Using GIS , 2009 .

[13]  P. Flynn,et al.  Development of a multicriteria assessment model for ranking biomass feedstock collection and transportation systems. , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[14]  Lynn L Wright,et al.  Historical Perspective on How and Why Switchgrass was Selected as a "Model" High-Potential Energy Crop , 2007 .

[15]  Yuan Gao Evaluation of Pre-processing and Storage Options in Biomass Supply Logistics: A Case Study in East Tennessee , 2011 .