Trajectory analysis of the transition to junior high school: Implications for prevention and policy

Summary There are important limitations to analysis of variance (ANOVA) as a melhod for longitudinal prevention research. We consider in particular the limitations of ANOVA for identifying different courses of adjustment during life transitions and the proportion of the population who manifest each course. To complement traditional ANOVA, we argue for the use of cluster analytic techniques to uncover differences in longitudinal trajectory. This method is illustrated with two-year longitudinal data on self-esteem during the transition from elementary school to junior high school. Four contrasting trajectories are identified: Consistently High (35%), Chronically Low (13%), Steeply Declining (21%), and Small Increase (31%). The identification of the Steeply Declining trajectory is considered especially important for prevention. The trajectory approach yields distinctive information for identifying and understanding at-risk groups, for informing the design of prevention and policy options, and for increasing ...

[1]  Larry Cuban,et al.  What Happens to Reforms That Last? The Case of the Junior High School , 1992 .

[2]  B. J. Hirsch,et al.  The relation of peer social support and psychological symptomatology during the transition to junior high school: A two-year longitudinal analysis , 1992, American journal of community psychology.

[3]  C. Midgley,et al.  Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children's domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. , 1991 .

[4]  Barton J. Hirsch,et al.  Self-esteem in early adolescence: The identification and prediction of contrasting longitudinal trajectories , 1991, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[5]  A. Petersen,et al.  School Transitions and Adjustment During Early Adolescence , 1989 .

[6]  B. Rapkin,et al.  The transition to junior high school: a longitudinal study of self-esteem, psychological symptomatology, school life, and social support. , 1987, Child development.

[7]  E. Nottelmann.  Competence and self-esteem during transition from childhood to adolescence. , 1987 .

[8]  A. Petersen,et al.  Changes in self-image during early adolescence. , 1984, New directions for mental health services.

[9]  G. Bogat,et al.  Evaluating a Preventive Orientation Program , 1984 .

[10]  A. Bayer,et al.  Schools and Newcomers: A National Survey of Innovative Programs , 1983 .

[11]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Self-esteem: Change and stability between ages 13 and 23. , 1983 .

[12]  R. Felner,et al.  Primary prevention during school transitions: Social support and environmental structure , 1982, American journal of community psychology.

[13]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Analysis of age effects in longitudinal studies of adolescent self-esteem. , 1982 .

[14]  D. Offer.  From teenage to young manhood , 1975 .

[15]  J. Hartigan.  Clustering Algorithms , 1975 .

[16]  M. Rosenberg.  Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[17]  C. Midgley,et al.  Development during adolescence. The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[18]  Dale A. Blyth,et al.  Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. , 1987 .