Collaborating for Knowledge Creation and Application: The Case of Nanotechnology Research Programs

We study how collaboration and internal resources drive knowledge creation and application in university research programs. Academic collaboration with fellow university scientists drives knowledge creation, whereas collaboration with industry partners drives knowledge application. Nevertheless, contrary to prior research that has underscored the merits of collaboration, we identify an optimal level of collaboration beyond which collaboration undermines both processes. Furthermore, the availability of internal resources can either complement or substitute for collaboration depending on the level of collaboration. In particular, we find that availability of internal resources mitigates the effect of academic collaboration on knowledge creation when collaboration is moderate and complements it as collaboration becomes excessive. Thus, our study reveals the contingent value of collaboration and the interplay between internal and network resources. It enhances understanding of collaboration in nascent science-driven industries and advances the resource-based view and knowledge management research.

[1]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance , 2005 .

[3]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[4]  David F. Channell Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[5]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  The nanotech vs . the biotech revolution : sources of productivity in incumbent firm research , 2007 .

[6]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[7]  M. Wright,et al.  Research and Technology Commercialization , 2008 .

[8]  Toby E. Stuart Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[9]  ST NANO,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE EMERGENCE AND DEPLOYMENT OF " NANO " S , 2009 .

[10]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[11]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[12]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[13]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[14]  I. Ràfols,et al.  Strategies for Knowledge Acquisition in Bionanotechnology: Why Are Interdisciplinary Practices Less Widespread Than Expected? , 2007 .

[15]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[16]  David M. Berube,et al.  Nano-Hype: The Truth Behind the Nanotechnology Buzz , 2005 .

[17]  Richard Florida,et al.  Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States , 1999 .

[18]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[20]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[21]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[22]  M. Knudsen The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development Success , 2007 .

[23]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system , 2000 .

[24]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[25]  M. Meyer,et al.  Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application , 1998, Scientometrics.

[26]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[27]  R. Gulati Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[29]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance , 2005 .

[30]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[31]  M. Wright,et al.  Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity : Evidence from the EU framework program , 2009 .

[32]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[33]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[34]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[35]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Application , 1999 .

[36]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[37]  Andrei Mogoutov,et al.  Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking , 2007 .

[38]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology , 2007, 0911.2982.

[39]  I Groupe,et al.  An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity , 1996 .

[40]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[41]  Joel Podolny Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[42]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[43]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[44]  Jonghoon Bae,et al.  Partner substitutability, alliance network structure and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry , 2004 .

[45]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[46]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[47]  B. Kogut,et al.  Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry , 1994 .

[48]  C. Freeman The Competitive Challenge. Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. David J. Teece, Ed. Ballinger (Harper and Row), Cambridge, MA, 1987. xii, 256 pp., illus. $26.95. Ballinger Series on Innovation and Organizational Change. Based on lectures, Berkeley, CA, 1984-85. , 1988, Science.

[49]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[50]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[51]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[52]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[53]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[54]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: New Tools for Unlocking the Mysteries of Tacit Understanding , 2000 .

[55]  W. H. Hoffmann Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances , 2007 .

[56]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[57]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[58]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[59]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[60]  I. Ràfols,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION IN BIONANOTECHNOLOGY , 2007 .

[61]  A. Gambardella Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[62]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[63]  A. Stankiewicz,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION AND HYBRIDIZATION IN FIRM KNOWLEDGE BASES IN NANOTECHNOLOGIES , 2010 .

[64]  A. Stinchcombe Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[65]  Dovev Lavie The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[66]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[68]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[69]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[70]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[71]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[72]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[73]  Richard Florida,et al.  Engine or Infrastructure? The University Role in Economic Development , 1999 .

[74]  Zan Huang,et al.  Longitudinal Patent Analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, Institution and Technology Field , 2003 .

[75]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[76]  F. Rothaermel Strategic Management Journal Research Note Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation , 2022 .

[77]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[78]  Anna Stafsudd,et al.  Managing network resources: alliances, affiliations and other relational assets , 2009 .

[79]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff , 1996 .

[80]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[81]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[82]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[83]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[84]  A. Agrawal University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions , 2001 .

[85]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[86]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[87]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 3rd ed. , 1998 .

[88]  J. Youtie,et al.  Refining search terms for nanotechnology , 2008 .

[89]  L. Leydesdorff The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[90]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Understanding the emergence and deployment of “nano” S&T , 2007, 0911.3323.

[91]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Organizations , 2002 .

[92]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[93]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[94]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[95]  Michael D. Mehta,et al.  Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Assessing the Nature of Innovation in These Fields , 2002 .

[96]  R. Gulati,et al.  Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer's Performance in Procurement Relationships , 2007 .

[97]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[98]  M. Meyer Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[99]  Dovev Lavie Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software Industry , 2007 .

[100]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[101]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Creation: Diminishing Returns of the Number and Strength of Exchange Relationships , 2004 .

[102]  J. Pennings,et al.  Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures , 2001 .

[103]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[104]  Todd Saxton,et al.  The Effects of Partner and Relationship Characteristics On Alliance Outcomes , 1997 .

[105]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[106]  Anne P. Carter,et al.  The Economics of Technological Change , 1966 .

[107]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[108]  B. Kogut,et al.  INTERFIRM COOPERATION AND STARTUP INNOVATION IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. , 1993 .

[109]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[110]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[111]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[112]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry , 2007 .

[113]  A. Shipilov Network Strategies and Performance of Canadian Investment Banks , 2006 .

[114]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[115]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[116]  Frederic William Wile A century of industrial progress , 1973 .

[117]  Margarethe F. Wiersema,et al.  The Use of Limited Dependent Variable Techniques in Strategy Research: Issues and Methods , 2009 .

[118]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[119]  Roger G. Noll Challenges to research universities , 1998 .

[120]  A SchillingMelissa,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks , 2007 .

[121]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[122]  David Barron,et al.  The Analysis of Count Data: Over-dispersion and Autocorrelation , 1992 .

[123]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[124]  L. Zucker,et al.  Minerva Unbound: Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and New Knowledge Production , 2006 .