AbstractCurrent study tried to determine whether a relationship exists between readiness levels of the online learning students for online learning and the perceived structure and interaction in online learning environments. In the study, cross sectional survey model was used. The study was conducted with 320 voluntary students studying online learning post-graduate programs in Sakarya University. The participants were administered a question- naire consisting of readiness for online learning, perceived structure and interaction in the study. The hypoth- eses of the research were tested with structural equation modeling. It was found at the end of the research that online learning students' readiness for online learning was positively related with their interactions in learning environments and negatively related with perceived structure. In addition, there appeared to be a negative rela- tionship between perceived structure and interaction. In the study, it was found that readiness for online learn- ing was important regarding the structure that affects learning results of students and interaction variables.Key WordsOnline Learning, Readiness, Structure, Interaction.Internet provides the opportunity to access intercultural and personalized knowledge for learning, to acquire theoretic knowledge and to explore and apply knowledge (Holmes & Gardner, 2006). Internet offers worldwide accessible knowledge (Broadbent, 2002) and learning applications (Aggarwal & Bento, 2000) in any time and place. One of the learning applications which has become widespread with the opportunities provided by internet is online learning.Online learning can be defined as gaining knowledge and skills through synchronous and asynchronous learning applications which are written, communicated, active, supported and managed with the use of internet technology (Morrison, 2003). Online learning has become one of the most benefited applications in higher education. More than 30% of the students in higher education in United States of America participate in online learning activities (Allen & Seaman, 2011).To be able to have more effective and efficient results in online learning; a field which is increasingly becoming widespread; it is required to find learning theories addressing learning from educational and technical aspects. Equality, community of inquiry and transactional distance (TD) can be mentioned among the field-specific theories to be used in online learning. TD theory which can be used in both learning and teaching design stands out among these theories (Cicciarelli, 2008; Garrison, 2000; Saba, 2003).TD is "the psychological and communicative space which leads to potential misunderstandings between student and teacher behaviors; in other words it is not only a physical distance" (Moore & Kearsley, 2012). Concept of "distance" in the theory was re- lated with two components, namely structure and dialogue. Constituent of structure means that the courses in distance learning programs include ele- ments which are able to meet the individual differ- ence and student needs and they are easily accessible (Saba & Shearer, 1994). Dialogue can be defined as thinking of the conflicting aspects of the content (Gorsky & Caspi, 2005a) and communication and interaction with other students and teachers (Gorsky & Caspi, 2005b). Moore (1989) started to address the dimension of dialogue as interaction in time and defined three interactions, namely, student-teacher, student-student and student-content interactions.In a distance learning program, increase in dialogue leads to decrease in structure whereas increase in structure leads to decrease in dialogue (Chen, 2001; Moore, 1991). In studies examining this hypothesis of the theory, a negative relationship was found be- tween structure and dialogue (Chen, 1997; Chen & Willits, 1998; Jung, Choi, Lim, & Leem, 2002; Hop- per, 2000; Horzum, 2007, 2011). …
[1]
Luis Miguel,et al.
(THREE TYPES OF INTERACTION (3TI) IN ONLINE LEARNING OF CURRICULUM AND TEACHING CAPACITIES (CTCS) OF TEACHERS OF THE CANARY ISLANDS' EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM)
,
2011
.
[2]
I. Jung,et al.
Effects of Different Types of Interaction on Learning Achievement, Satisfaction and Participation in Web-Based Instruction
,
2002
.
[3]
Mike Moore,et al.
Editorial: Distance education theory
,
1991
.
[4]
MarySue Cicciarelli,et al.
A Description of Online Instructors Use of Design Theory
,
2008,
Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..
[5]
Farhad Saba,et al.
Verifying Key Theoretical Concepts in a Dynamic Model of Distance Education.
,
1994
.
[6]
Karen L. Murphy,et al.
Towards Identifying Factors Underlying Readiness for Online Learning: An Exploratory Study
,
2003
.
[7]
Hsiu-Mei Huang,et al.
Student Perceptions in an Online Mediated Environment.
,
2002
.
[8]
Heather Kanuka,et al.
University Instructor Perceptions of the Use of Asynchronous Text-Based Discussion in Distance Courses
,
2002
.
[9]
Peter J. Smith,et al.
Learning preferences and readiness for online learning
,
2005
.
[10]
Patrick R. Lowenthal,et al.
Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: a validation study
,
2011
.
[11]
Carol Dianne Martin,et al.
Empirical comparison of technical and non-technical distance education courses to derive a refined transactional distance theory as the framework for a utilization-focused evaluation tool
,
1999
.
[12]
H. Pillay,et al.
Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing Tertiary students’ readiness for online learning
,
2007
.
[13]
C. Gunawardena,et al.
DISTANCE EDUCATION
,
2003
.
[14]
Junaid M. Shaikh,et al.
The Impacts of Personal Qualities on Online Learning Readiness at Curtin Sarawak Malaysia (CSM).
,
2012
.
[15]
K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.
Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures.
,
2003
.
[16]
Sarah W. Bisconer,et al.
Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals
,
1996
.
[17]
Chien Chou,et al.
Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions
,
2010,
Comput. Educ..
[18]
Mehmet Barış Horzum,et al.
Structural equation modeling in readiness, willingness and anxiety of secondary school students about the distance learning
,
2012
.
[19]
Yau Jane Chen,et al.
Transactional Distance in World Wide Web Learning Environments
,
2001
.
[20]
Avner Caspi,et al.
Dialogue: a theoretical framework for distance education instructional systems
,
2005,
Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[21]
R. Garrison.
Theoretical Challenges for Distance Education in the 21st Century: A Shift from Structural to Transactional Issues
,
2000
.
[22]
Binshan Lin,et al.
Web-based teaching and learner control: a research review
,
2001,
Comput. Educ..
[23]
I. E. Allen,et al.
Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011.
,
2011
.
[24]
Peter J. Smith.
Preparedness for flexible delivery among vocational learners
,
2000
.
[25]
M. Moore.
The Theory of Transactional Distance
,
2012,
Handbook of Distance Education.
[26]
Hye-Jung Lee,et al.
Influence of Structure and Interaction on Student Achievement and Satisfaction in Web-Based Distance Learning
,
2009,
J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[27]
Ryan Watkins,et al.
Assessing Readiness for E‐Learning
,
2008
.
[28]
Yau-Jane Chen,et al.
Dimensions of educational transactions in a videoconferencing learning environment
,
1999
.
[29]
Avner Caspi,et al.
A Critical Analysis of Transactional Distance Theory
,
2005
.