Neural Principles of Memory and a Neural Theory of Analogical Insight.

Grossberg's principles of neural modeling are reviewed and extended to provide a neural level theory to explain how analogies greatly increase the rate of learning and can, in fact, make learning and retention possible. In terms of memory, the key point is that the mind is able to recognize and recall when it is able to match sensory input from new objects, events, or situations with past memory records of “similar” objects, events, or situations. When a match occurs, an adaptive resonance is set up in which the synaptic strengths of neurons are increased; thus a long term record of the new input is formed in memory. Systems of neurons called outstars and instars are presumably the underlying units that enable this to occur. Analogies can greatly facilitate learning and retention because they activate the outstars (i.e., the cells that are sampling the to-be-learned pattern) and cause the neural activity to grow exponentially by forming feedback loops. This increased activity insures the boost in synaptic strengths of neurons, thus causing storage and retention in long-term memory (i.e., learning).

[1]  P. Simons,et al.  Instructing With Analogies. , 1984 .

[2]  L. Flick Where concepts meet percepts: Stimulating analogical thought in children , 1991 .

[3]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter , 1991 .

[4]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  On Knowing: Essays for the Left Hand , 1963 .

[5]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  R. Chaffin,et al.  Cognitive and Psychometric Analysis of Analogical Problem Solving , 1990 .

[7]  Analogy as a Model for the Development of Representational Abilities in Children , 1987 .

[8]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.

[9]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Using Analogs for Chemistry Problem Solving: Does it Increase Understanding? , 1990 .

[10]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[11]  John Clement,et al.  METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE VALIDITY OF HYPOTHESIZED ANALOGIES , 1986 .

[12]  R. Oppenheimer Analogy in science. , 1956 .

[13]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[14]  M. Mishkin,et al.  The anatomy of memory. , 1987, Scientific American.

[15]  Karl Josef Klauer Teaching for analogical transfer as a means of improving problem-solving, thinking and learning , 1989 .

[16]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  High School Students' Ability to Solve Molarity Problems and Their Analog Counterparts. , 1986 .

[17]  R. Dreistadt,et al.  An analysis of the use of analogies and metaphors in science. , 1968, The Journal of psychology.

[18]  J. Carbonell Learning by Analogy: Formulating and Generalizing Plans from Past Experience , 1983 .

[19]  A. Lawson A neurological model of sensory‐motor problem solving with possible implications for higher‐order cognition and instruction , 1986 .

[20]  A. Koestler The Act of Creation , 1964 .

[21]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Studies of mind and brain , 1982 .

[22]  K. Gilhooly,et al.  Lines of thinking : reflections on the psychology of thought , 1990 .

[23]  Norwood Russell Hanson,et al.  Patterns of discovery : an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science , 1958 .

[24]  Michael J. Webb Analogies and Their Limitations , 1985 .

[25]  David E. Brown,et al.  Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction , 1989 .

[26]  Steven W. Gilbert,et al.  An evaluation of the use of analogy, simile, and metaphor in science texts , 1989 .

[27]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Analogies as an aid to understanding and memory , 1990 .

[28]  J. J. Dupin,et al.  Analogies and “modeling analogies” in teaching: Some examples in basic electricity , 1989 .