Principal Component and Neural Network Analyses of Face Images: What Can Be Generalized in Gender Classification?

We present an overview of the major findings of the principal component analysis (pca) approach to facial analysis. In a neural network or connectionist framework, this approach is known as the linear autoassociator approach. Faces are represented as a weighted sum of macrofeatures (eigenvectors or eigenfaces) extracted from a cross-product matrix of face images. Using gender categorization as an illustration, we analyze the robustness of this type of facial representation. We show that eigenvectors representing general categorical information can be estimated using a very small set of faces and that the information they convey is generalizable to new faces of the same population and to a lesser extent to new faces of a different population. Copyright 1997 Academic Press. Copyright 1997 Academic Press

[1]  Y. Kaya,et al.  A BASIC STUDY ON HUMAN FACE RECOGNITION , 1972 .

[2]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Simulating the ‘Other-race Effect* as a Problem in Perceptual Learning , 1991 .

[3]  A. Yuille Deformable Templates for Face Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Leon D. Harmon,et al.  Automatic recognition of human face profiles , 1977 .

[5]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[6]  H. Ellis,et al.  Parallel processing of the sex and familiarity of faces. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Parallel Models of Associative Memory , 1989 .

[8]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  A NEURAL NETWORK PRIMER , 1994 .

[9]  A. M. Burton,et al.  What's the Difference between Men and Women? Evidence from Facial Measurement , 1993, Perception.

[10]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  CATEGORIZATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN FACE IMAGES BY NEURAL NETWORKS: A REVIEW OF THE LINEAR AUTOASSOCIATIVE AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENT APPROACHES , 1994 .

[11]  Ashok Samal,et al.  Minimum resolution for human face detection and identification , 1991, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Arthur P Ginsburg,et al.  Visual Information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data. , 1978 .

[13]  A J O'Toole,et al.  More about the Difference between Men and Women: Evidence from Linear Neural Networks and the Principal-Component Approach , 1995, Perception.

[14]  K. Cave,et al.  Can We Lose Memories of Faces? Content Specificity and Awareness in a Prosopagnosic , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Aspects of face processing , 1986 .

[16]  Stephen A. Ritz,et al.  Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: some applications of a neural model , 1977 .

[17]  M. K. Khan,et al.  Machine identification of human faces , 1981, Pattern Recognition.

[18]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding covert recognition , 1991, Cognition.

[19]  Osamu Nakamura,et al.  Identification of human faces based on isodensity maps , 1991, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  L. D. Harmon The recognition of faces. , 1973, Scientific American.

[21]  Sun-Yuan Kung,et al.  Principal Component Neural Networks: Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[22]  L Sirovich,et al.  Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Sex Classification is Better with Three-Dimensional Head Structure Than with Image Intensity Information , 1997, Perception.

[24]  A. Young,et al.  Cross-Domain Semantic Priming in Normal Subjects and a Prosopagnosic Patient , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  Toshiyuki Sakai,et al.  Processing of multilevel pictures by computer-the case of photographs of human face , 1971 .

[26]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Ashok Samal,et al.  Automatic recognition and analysis of human faces and facial expressions: a survey , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[28]  H. Abdi,et al.  What Represents a Face? A Computational Approach for the Integration of Physiological and Psychological Data , 1997, Perception.

[29]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Reclassification , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[30]  J. Demongeot,et al.  Artificial intelligence and cognitive sciences , 1988 .

[31]  A. O'Toole,et al.  An ‘other-Race Effect’ for Categorizing Faces by Sex , 1996, Perception.

[32]  Robert Dale,et al.  Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1991 .

[33]  J. Sergent Microgenesis of Face Perception , 1986 .

[34]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[35]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face space , 1993 .

[36]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  CAN A LINEAR AUTOASSOCIATOR RECOGNIZE FACES FROM NEW ORIENTATIONS , 1996 .

[37]  H. Abdi,et al.  Connectionist "face"-off: Different algorithms for different tasks , 1996 .

[38]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Connectionist models of face processing: A survey , 1994, Pattern Recognit..