Sparse grid-based polynomial chaos expansion for aerodynamics of an airfoil with uncertainties

Abstract The uncertainties can generate fluctuations with aerodynamic characteristics. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is applied to compute its impact on the aerodynamic characteristics. In addition, the contribution of each uncertainty to aerodynamic characteristics should be computed by uncertainty sensitivity analysis. Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos (NIPC) has been successfully applied to uncertainty quantification and uncertainty sensitivity analysis. However, the non-intrusive polynomial chaos method becomes inefficient as the number of random variables adopted to describe uncertainties increases. This deficiency becomes significant in stochastic aerodynamic analysis considering the geometric uncertainty because the description of geometric uncertainty generally needs many parameters. To solve the deficiency, a Sparse Grid-based Polynomial Chaos (SGPC) expansion is used to do uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for stochastic aerodynamic analysis considering geometric and operational uncertainties. It is proved that the method is more efficient than non-intrusive polynomial chaos and Monte Carlo Simulation (MSC) method for the stochastic aerodynamic analysis. By uncertainty quantification, it can be learnt that the flow characteristics of shock wave and boundary layer separation are sensitive to the geometric uncertainty in transonic region. The uncertainty sensitivity analysis reveals the individual and coupled effects among the uncertainty parameters.

[1]  Hui Tian,et al.  Uncertainty analysis and design optimization of hybrid rocket motor powered vehicle for suborbital flight , 2015 .

[2]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2009 .

[4]  Marin D. Guenov,et al.  Novel Uncertainty Propagation Method for Robust Aerodynamic Design , 2011 .

[5]  Didier Lucor,et al.  Stochastic Investigation of Flows About Airfoils at Transonic Speeds , 2010 .

[6]  R. Walters,et al.  Point-Collocation Nonintrusive Polynomial Chaos Method for Stochastic Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2010 .

[7]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  A gPC-based approach to uncertain transonic aerodynamics , 2010 .

[8]  Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,et al.  Sparse grid collocation schemes for stochastic natural convection problems , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  Zhigang Wu,et al.  Epistemic uncertainty quantification in flutter analysis using evidence theory , 2015 .

[10]  K. Ritter,et al.  High dimensional integration of smooth functions over cubes , 1996 .

[11]  Shun Kang,et al.  Stochastic performance evaluation of horizontal axis wind turbine blades using non-deterministic CFD simulations , 2014 .

[12]  Michael Griebel,et al.  Data Mining with Sparse Grids , 2001, Computing.

[13]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Weiwei Zhang,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Transonic Aerodynamics with Geometric Uncertainty , 2017 .

[15]  Chao Yang,et al.  Methods and advances in the study of aeroelasticity with uncertainties , 2014 .

[16]  Weiwei Zhang,et al.  The interaction between flutter and buffet in transonic flow , 2015 .

[17]  Ying Xiong,et al.  A new sparse grid based method for uncertainty propagation , 2010 .

[18]  P. Roache QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS , 1997 .

[19]  Lu Zhenzhou,et al.  Reliability and Sensitivity Analysis of Transonic Flutter Using Improved Line Sampling Technique , 2009 .

[20]  Michel van Tooren,et al.  Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles , 2011 .

[21]  D. Xiu,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos , 2003 .

[22]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Parametric reduced-order models for probabilistic analysis of unsteady aerodynamic applications , 2007 .

[23]  Thomas A. Zang,et al.  Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations , 2005, Numerical Algorithms.

[24]  David L. Darmofal,et al.  Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performance , 2003 .

[25]  O. L. Maître,et al.  Uncertainty propagation in CFD using polynomial chaos decomposition , 2006 .

[26]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  High-Order Collocation Methods for Differential Equations with Random Inputs , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[27]  R. Sampaio,et al.  Subspace inverse power method and polynomial chaos representation for the modal frequency responses of random mechanical systems , 2016 .

[28]  Geoffrey T. Parks,et al.  Robust Aerodynamic Design Optimization Using Polynomial Chaos , 2009 .

[29]  O. Amoignon,et al.  Mesh Deformation using Radial Basis Functions for Gradient-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2007 .

[30]  Thomas Gerstner,et al.  Numerical integration using sparse grids , 2004, Numerical Algorithms.

[31]  Jinsheng Cai,et al.  Gappy Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Based Two-Step Optimization for Airfoil Design , 2012 .

[32]  Weiwei Zhang,et al.  Mechanism of frequency lock-in in vortex-induced vibrations at low Reynolds numbers , 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  A. Resmini,et al.  Sparse grids‐based stochastic approximations with applications to aerodynamics sensitivity analysis , 2016 .

[34]  Dominique Pelletier,et al.  Adaptivity, Sensitivity, and Uncertainty: Toward Standards of Good Practice in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2003 .