Effectiveness of a Forward Collision Warning System in simple and in dual task from an electrophysiological perspective

Forward Collision Warning Systems (FCWS) are expected to assist drivers; however, it is not completely clear whether these systems are of benefit to distracted drivers as much as they are to undistracted drivers. This study aims at investigating further the analysis of the effectiveness of a surrogate FCWS according to the attentional state of participants. In this experiment electrophysiological and behavioural data were recording while participants were required to drive in a simple car simulator and to react to the braking of the lead vehicle which could be announced by a warning system. The effectiveness of this warning system was evaluated when drivers were distracted or not by a secondary cognitive task. In a previous study, the warning signal was not completely effective likely due to the presence of another predictor of the forthcoming braking which competes with the warning. By eliminating this secondary predictor in the present study, the results confirmed the negative effect of the secondary task and revealed the expected effectiveness of the warning system at behavioural and electrophysiological levels.

[1]  de Dick Waard,et al.  Proceedings 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design , 2008 .

[2]  Marie-Pierre Bruyas.  An evaluation of the impact of vocal communication on the driving task ::: Évaluation de l'impact de communications vocales sur la conduite automobile , 2006 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[4]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Ana L. N. Fred,et al.  Unveiling the Biometric Potential of Finger-Based ECG Signals , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[6]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[7]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Active Listening Impairs Visual Perception and Selectivity: An ERP Study of Auditory Dual-task Costs on Visual Attention , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  David Shinar,et al.  Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid distracted drivers , 2007 .

[9]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[10]  T. Braver,et al.  A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[11]  Karim Jerbi,et al.  ELAN: A Software Package for Analysis and Visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP Signals , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[12]  John Richardson,et al.  The effect of alarm timing on driver behaviour: an investigation of differences in driver trust and response to alarms according to alarm timing , 2004 .

[13]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  S. Hackley,et al.  Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[15]  Alexandra Fort,et al.  An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task , 2012, Brain Research.

[16]  Alexandra Fort,et al.  Impact of totally and partially predictive alert in distracted and undistracted subjects: An event related potential study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[18]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Multisensory In-Car Warning Signals for Collision Avoidance , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[20]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[21]  A P Rudell,et al.  Does a warning signal accelerate the processing of sensory information? Evidence from recognition potential responses to high and low frequency words. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  James P Bliss,et al.  Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Albert Postma,et al.  Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  A. Baddeley.  Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[25]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Using Peripersonal Warning Signals to Orient a Driver’s Gaze , 2009, Hum. Factors.