Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress

[1]  David Cella,et al.  A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression , 2007, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  J. Teresi,et al.  Identification of Differential Item Functioning Using Item Response Theory and the Likelihood-Based Model Comparison Approach: Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination , 2006, Medical care.

[3]  J. Teresi,et al.  Item and Scale Differential Functioning of the Mini-Mental State Exam Assessed Using the Differential Item and Test Functioning (DFIT) Framework , 2006, Medical care.

[4]  Edward Kulick,et al.  Differential Item Functioning on the Mini-Mental State Examination: An Application of the Mantel-Haenszel and Standardization Procedures , 2006, Medical care.

[5]  J. Teresi.  Different Approaches to Differential Item Functioning in Health Applications: Advantages, Disadvantages and Some Neglected Topics , 2006, Medical care.

[6]  A. Stewart,et al.  Measurement in a Multi-Ethnic Society , 2006 .

[7]  T. C. Oshima,et al.  A New Method for Assessing the Statistical Significance in the Differential Functioning of Items and Tests (DFIT) Framework , 2006 .

[8]  B. Carleton,et al.  The Dimensionality and Gender Differential Item Functioning of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ) , 2004 .

[9]  L. Bouter,et al.  Measuring activity limitations in climbing stairs: development of a hierarchical scale for patients with lower-extremity disorders living at home. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Gerald van Belle,et al.  Test bias in a cognitive test: differential item functioning in the CASI , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Wen-Chung Wang,et al.  Effects of Anchor Item Methods on Differential Item Functioning Detection with the Likelihood Ratio Test , 2003 .

[12]  J. Fleishman,et al.  Demographic Variation in SF‐12 Scores: True Differences or Differential Item Functioning? , 2003, Medical care.

[13]  David Thissen,et al.  Quick and Easy Implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure for Controlling the False Positive Rate in Multiple Comparisons , 2002 .

[14]  L. Steinberg,et al.  The consequences of pairing questions: context effects in personality measurement. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  J. Teresi,et al.  Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  W. C. Collins,et al.  Assessing differential functioning in a satisfaction scale. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  S. Cole,et al.  Test of item-response bias in the CES-D scale. experience from the New Haven EPESE study. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  Nambury S. Raju,et al.  A Description and Demonstration of the Polytomous-DFIT Framework , 1999 .

[19]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Controlling Error in Multiple Comparisons, with Examples from State-to-State Differences in Educational Achievement , 1999 .

[20]  L. Cooper-Patrick,et al.  Depressive symptoms of whites and African Americans aged 60 years and older. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[21]  K. Ryan.  Methods for identifying biased test items , 1997 .

[22]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  IRT-Based Internal Measures of Differential Functioning of Items and Tests , 1995 .

[23]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  The unique correspondence of the item response function and item category response functions in polytomously scored item response models , 1994 .

[24]  L. Shepard,et al.  Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items , 1994 .

[25]  Wim Jansen,et al.  Multilog: Multiple, Categorical Item Analysis and Test Scoring Using Item Response Theory , 1994 .

[26]  Howard T. Everson,et al.  Methodology Review: Statistical Approaches for Assessing Measurement Bias , 1993 .

[27]  Allan S. Cohen,et al.  Detection of Differential Item Functioning in the Graded Response Model , 1993 .

[28]  J. Mckillip,et al.  Fundamentals of item response theory , 1993 .

[29]  P. Holland,et al.  DIF DETECTION AND DESCRIPTION: MANTEL‐HAENSZEL AND STANDARDIZATION1,2 , 1992 .

[30]  H. Swaminathan,et al.  Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures , 1990 .

[31]  F. Lord.  Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems , 1980 .

[32]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[33]  F. Samejima.  Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores , 1968 .

[34]  E. H. Simpson,et al.  The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables , 1951 .

[35]  M. Orlando,et al.  Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the PTSD checklist: detection and evaluation of impact. , 2002, Psychological assessment.

[36]  D. Burnette,et al.  Cross-cultural assessment of geriatric depression: A review of the CES-D and the GDS. , 2001 .

[37]  B. Zumbo.  A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING AS A UNITARY FRAMEWORK FOR BINARY AND LIKERT-TYPE (ORDINAL) ITEM SCORES , 1999 .

[38]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[39]  H. Wainer,et al.  Differential item functioning , 1995 .

[40]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. , 1993 .