Exploring the coevolution of predator and prey morphology and behavior

A common idiom in biology education states, "Eyes in the front, the animal hunts. Eyes on the side, the animal hides." In this paper, we explore one possible explanation for why predators tend to have forward-facing, high-acuity visual systems. We do so using an agent-based computational model of evolution, where predators and prey interact and adapt their behavior and morphology to one another over successive generations of evolution. In this model, we observe a coevolutionary cycle between prey swarming behavior and the predator's visual system, where the predator and prey continually adapt their visual system and behavior, respectively, over evolutionary time in reaction to one another due to the well-known "predator confusion effect." Furthermore, we provide evidence that the predator visual system is what drives this coevolutionary cycle, and suggest that the cycle could be closed if the predator evolves a hybrid visual system capable of narrow, high-acuity vision for tracking prey as well as broad, coarse vision for prey discovery. Thus, the conflicting demands imposed on a predator's visual system by the predator confusion effect could have led to the evolution of complex eyes in many predators.

[1]  A. W. F. Edwards,et al.  The statistical processes of evolutionary theory , 1963 .

[2]  Pulliam Hr,et al.  On the advantages of flocking , 1973 .

[3]  M. Aldana,et al.  New tools for characterizing swarming systems: A comparison of minimal models , 2008 .

[4]  Randal S. Olson,et al.  Evolution of Swarming Behavior Is Shaped by How Predators Attack , 2013, Artificial Life.

[5]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  The evolutionary origin of complex features , 2003, Nature.

[6]  M. Land.  Visual acuity in insects. , 1997, Annual review of entomology.

[7]  Randal S. Olson,et al.  Exploring the evolution of a trade-off between vigilance and foraging in group-living organisms , 2014, Royal Society Open Science.

[8]  W. Wcislo,et al.  Secondarily solitary: the evolutionary loss of social behavior. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Thomas J. Lisney,et al.  A novel method for comparative analysis of retinal specialization traits from topographic maps. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[10]  Andrew L Jackson,et al.  The Confusion Effect in Predatory Neural Networks , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[11]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Predation and group living , 1987 .

[12]  Robert E. Kenward,et al.  HAWKS AND DOVES: FACTORS AFFECTING SUCCESS AND SELECTION IN GOSHAWK ATTACKS ON WOODPIGEONS. , 1978 .

[13]  R. Olberg,et al.  Visual control of prey-capture flight in dragonflies , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Randal S. Olson,et al.  Exploring Conditions That Select for the Evolution of Cooperative Group Foraging , 2014 .

[15]  W. Foster,et al.  Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect , 1981, Nature.

[16]  Randal S. Olson,et al.  Evolving an optimal group size in groups of prey under predation , 2015, ECAL.

[17]  R. Tollrian,et al.  Prey swarming: which predators become confused and why? , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  A. J. Wood,et al.  Evolving the selfish herd: emergence of distinct aggregating strategies in an individual-based model , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  W. Foster,et al.  Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: The trafalgar effect , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Marguerite Hugueney,et al.  Evolution and escalation, an ecological history of life , 1988 .

[22]  Arend Hintze,et al.  Integrated Information Increases with Fitness in the Evolution of Animats , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[24]  Jens Krause,et al.  The confusion effect—from neural networks to reduced predation risk , 2008 .

[25]  G. Martin.  The eye of a passeriform bird, the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): eye movement amplitude, visual fields and schematic optics , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  R. S. Olson.  Elucidating the evolutionary origins of collective animal behavior , 2015 .

[27]  Randal S. Olson,et al.  Critical interplay between density-dependent predation and evolution of the selfish herd , 2013, GECCO '13.

[28]  W. Foster,et al.  Group size and anti-predator strategies in a marine insect , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Arend Hintze,et al.  Predator confusion is sufficient to evolve swarming behaviour , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  H. Pulliam,et al.  On the advantages of flocking. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[32]  Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al.  Effects of predator confusion on functional responses. , 2005 .

[33]  W. Hamilton.  Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.