Native and exotic plant species exhibit similar population dynamics during succession.

A growing body of literature has led to the debate in invasion biology whether exotic species perform within communities differently than native taxa due to inherent advantages. To address this issue, the population dynamics of native and exotic plant species were assessed from a 48-year record of permanent plot data from the Hutcheson Memorial Forest Center (New Jersey, USA) to determine rate of increase, lag time, maximum frequency, and the year of peak frequency. Overall, native and exotic species exhibited very similar population dynamics. Rates of increase and length of lag times were similar between native and exotic taxa but were strongly influenced by plant life form. Short-lived species were characterized by rapid population growth rates and short lag times. Growth rates decreased and lag times increased with species longevity. Overall, correlations between population metrics were the same in native and exotic taxa, suggesting similar trade-offs in life history patterns. The one difference observed was that, in native species, peak frequency was negatively associated with the year of peak frequency (i.e., early-successional species tended to become more abundant), while there was no relationship in exotic species. These analyses show that exotic species behave in essentially the same way as native taxa within dynamic communities. This suggests that abundant native and exotic plant species are exploiting the same range of ecological strategies resulting in similar roles within communities.

[1]  D. Pyke.  Comparative demography of co-occurring introduced and native tussock grasses: persistence and potential expansion , 1990, Oecologia.

[2]  J. Klironomos.  Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities , 2002, Nature.

[3]  B. Blossey,et al.  Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis , 1995 .

[4]  Cynthia S. Brown,et al.  Community assembly and invasion: An experimental test of neutral versus niche processes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  K. Thompson,et al.  Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? , 1995 .

[6]  S. Meiners,et al.  Invasion impacts diversity through altered community dynamics , 2005 .

[7]  Arthur Cronquist,et al.  Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada , 2004 .

[8]  S. Meiners,et al.  Drought impacts and recovery are driven by local variation in species turnover , 2006, Plant Ecology.

[9]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological Invasion by Myrica faya Alters Ecosystem Development in Hawaii , 1987, Science.

[10]  G. Wein,et al.  Competition between native and immigrant Polygonum congeners , 1993 .

[11]  C. Daehler.  PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS OF Co-OCCURRING NATIVE AND ALIEN INVASIVE PLANTS: Implications for Conservation and Restoration , 2003 .

[12]  V. Nuzzo.  Invasion Pattern of Herb Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in High Quality Forests , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[13]  J. Lovett-Doust,et al.  Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties , 2002 .

[14]  B. Lamont,et al.  Survival and growth of native and exotic composites in response to a nutrient gradient , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[15]  P. B. Cavers,et al.  THE BIOLOGY OF CANADIAN WEEDS.: 35. Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara and Grande , 1979 .

[16]  L. Wolfe.  Why Alien Invaders Succeed: Support for the Escape‐from‐Enemy Hypothesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[17]  K. Larson,et al.  Greater morphological plasticity of exotic honeysuckle species may make them better invaders than native species. , 1999 .

[18]  A. Magurran,et al.  Biological diversity : the coexistence of species on changing landscapes , 1994 .

[19]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .

[20]  S. Pickett,et al.  Initial conditions, history and successional pathways in ten contrasting old fields. , 1990 .

[21]  D. Pearson,et al.  WEAK VS. STRONG INVADERS OF NATURAL PLANT COMMUNITIES: ASSESSING INVASIBILITY AND IMPACT , 2005 .

[22]  M. C. Robertson,et al.  Colonization dynamics of four exotic plants in a northern Piedmont natural area , 1994 .

[23]  H. A. Gleason,et al.  Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. , 1963 .

[24]  M. Crawley,et al.  Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis , 2002 .

[25]  A. Knapp,et al.  Physiological and Morphological Traits of Exotic, Invasive Exotic, and Native Plant Species in Tallgrass Prairie , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[26]  J. Grace,et al.  The effects of gap size and disturbance type on invasion of wet pine savanna by cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica (Poaceae). , 2000, American journal of botany.

[27]  S. Pickett.  Population patterns through twenty years of oldfield succession , 1982, Vegetatio.

[28]  James H. Brown,et al.  The paradox of invasion , 2000 .

[29]  Mary L. Cadenasso,et al.  Exotic plant invasions over 40 years of old field successions: community patterns and associations , 2002 .

[30]  William A. Niering,et al.  Four decades of old field vegetation development and the role of Celastrus orbiculatus in the northeastern United States , 1999 .