Perceptual Evaluation for Multi-Exposure Image Fusion of Dynamic Scenes

A common approach to high dynamic range (HDR) imaging is to capture multiple images of different exposures followed by multi-exposure image fusion (MEF) in either radiance or intensity domain. A predominant problem of this approach is the introduction of the ghosting artifacts in dynamic scenes with camera and object motion. While many MEF methods (often referred to as deghosting algorithms) have been proposed for reduced ghosting artifacts and improved visual quality, little work has been dedicated to perceptual evaluation of their deghosting results. Here we first construct a database that contains 20 multi-exposure sequences of dynamic scenes and their corresponding fused images by nine MEF algorithms. We then carry out a subjective experiment to evaluate fused image quality, and find that none of existing objective quality models for MEF provides accurate quality predictions. Motivated by this, we develop an objective quality model for MEF of dynamic scenes. Specifically, we divide the test image into static and dynamic regions, measure structural similarity between the image and the corresponding sequence in the two regions separately, and combine quality measurements of the two regions into an overall quality score. Experimental results show that the proposed method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art. In addition, we demonstrate the promise of the proposed model in parameter tuning of MEF methods. The subjective database and the MATLAB code of the proposed model are made publicly available at https://github.com/h4nwei/MEF-SSIMd.

[1]  Desire Sidibé,et al.  Ghost detection and removal for high dynamic range images: Recent advances , 2012, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[2]  R. Venkatesh Babu,et al.  DeepFuse: A Deep Unsupervised Approach for Exposure Fusion with Extreme Exposure Image Pairs , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[3]  Chi-Keung Tang,et al.  Deep High Dynamic Range Imaging with Large Foreground Motions , 2017, ECCV.

[4]  Chul Lee,et al.  Ghost-Free High Dynamic Range Imaging via Rank Minimization , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  Yi Shen,et al.  Performances evaluation of image fusion techniques based on nonlinear correlation measurement , 2004, Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510).

[6]  Eli Shechtman,et al.  Robust patch-based hdr reconstruction of dynamic scenes , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[7]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1952 .

[8]  Aykut Erdem,et al.  The State of the Art in HDR Deghosting: A Survey and Evaluation , 2015, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[9]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Robust Match Fusion Using Optimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[10]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[11]  Jan Kautz,et al.  Exposure Fusion , 2009, 15th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications (PG'07).

[12]  Zhengfang Duanmu,et al.  Multi-Exposure Image Fusion by Optimizing A Structural Similarity Index , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[13]  Jan Kautz,et al.  Bitmap Movement Detection: HDR for Dynamic Scenes , 2010, 2010 Conference on Visual Media Production.

[14]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Seamless Image Stitching of Scenes with Large Motions and Exposure Differences , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[15]  Greg Ward,et al.  Fast, Robust Image Registration for Compositing High Dynamic Range Photographs from Hand-Held Exposures , 2003, J. Graphics, GPU, & Game Tools.

[16]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Robust Multi-Exposure Image Fusion: A Structural Patch Decomposition Approach , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Peng-wei Wang,et al.  A novel image fusion metric based on multi-scale analysis , 2008, 2008 9th International Conference on Signal Processing.

[18]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Spatial Pooling Strategies for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[19]  Karel Fliegel,et al.  Quality Assessment of Sharpened Images: Challenges, Methodology, and Objective Metrics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  David Bull,et al.  Image fusion metric based on mutual information and Tsallis entropy , 2006 .

[21]  Denis Simakov,et al.  Summarizing visual data using bidirectional similarity , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  Henk J. A. M. Heijmans,et al.  A new quality metric for image fusion , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[23]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Perceptual quality assessment of HDR deghosting algorithms , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[24]  E. Reinhard Photographic Tone Reproduction for Digital Images , 2002 .

[25]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting , 2010 .

[26]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[27]  Yufeng Zheng,et al.  A new metric based on extended spatial frequency and its application to DWT based fusion algorithms , 2007, Inf. Fusion.

[28]  Jun Hu,et al.  HDR Deghosting: How to Deal with Saturation? , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[29]  Shiqian Wu,et al.  Selectively Detail-Enhanced Fusion of Differently Exposed Images With Moving Objects , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[30]  Aykut Erdem,et al.  An Objective Deghosting Quality Metric for HDR Images , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[31]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Comparison of Deghosting Algorithms for Multi-exposure High Dynamic Range Imaging , 2013, SCCG.

[32]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[33]  Ravi Ramamoorthi,et al.  Deep high dynamic range imaging of dynamic scenes , 2017, ACM Trans. Graph..

[34]  Tae-Hyun Oh,et al.  Robust High Dynamic Range Imaging by Rank Minimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[35]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  How to Analyze Paired Comparison Data , 2011 .

[36]  Shutao Li,et al.  Fast multi-exposure image fusion with median filter and recursive filter , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[37]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Assessment of multi-exposure HDR image deghosting methods , 2017, Comput. Graph..

[38]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Determining the Camera Response from Images: What Is Knowable? , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[39]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  How to benchmark objective quality metrics from paired comparison data? , 2016, 2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[40]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  A human perception inspired quality metric for image fusion based on regional information , 2007, Inf. Fusion.

[41]  Zheng Liu,et al.  Objective Assessment of Multiresolution Image Fusion Algorithms for Context Enhancement in Night Vision: A Comparative Study , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[42]  M. Hossny,et al.  Comments on 'Information measure for performance of image fusion' , 2008 .

[43]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons , 1952 .

[44]  Kai Zeng,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of multi-exposure image fusion algorithms , 2014, 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[45]  Marius Tico,et al.  Artifact-free High Dynamic Range imaging , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP).

[46]  Kai Zeng,et al.  Perceptual Quality Assessment for Multi-Exposure Image Fusion , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[47]  Vladimir S. Petrovic,et al.  Objective pixel-level image fusion performance measure , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.