The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke

Objective: To evaluate the effect of robot-mediated therapy on arm dysfunction post stroke. Design: A series of single-case studies using a randomized multiple baseline design with ABC or ACB order. Subjects (n = 20) had a baseline length of 8, 9 or 10 data points. They continued measurement during the B — robot-mediated therapy and C — sling suspension phases. Setting: Physiotherapy department, teaching hospital. Subjects: Twenty subjects with varying degrees of motor and sensory deficit completed the study. Subjects attended three times a week, with each phase lasting three weeks. Interventions: In the robot-mediated therapy phase they practised three functional exercises with haptic and visual feedback from the system. In the sling suspension phase they practised three single-plane exercises. Each treatment phase was three weeks long. Main measures: The range of active shoulder flexion, the Fugl-Meyer motor assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale were measured at each visit. Results: Each subject had a varied response to the measurement and intervention phases. The rate of recovery was greater during the robot-mediated therapy phase than in the baseline phase for the majority of subjects. The rate of recovery during the robot-mediated therapy phase was also greater than that during the sling suspension phase for most subjects. Conclusion: The positive treatment effect for both groups suggests that robot-mediated therapy can have a treatment effect greater than the same duration of non-functional exercises. Further studies investigating the optimal duration of treatment in the form of a randomized controlled trial are warranted.

[1]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Single-case experimental designs in clinical research and practice. , 1982 .

[3]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Single-Case Research Designs , 1982 .

[4]  R. Katzman.,et al.  Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. , 1983, The American journal of psychiatry.

[5]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[6]  J. Plewes,et al.  Measurement of joint motion: A guide to goniometry , 1986 .

[7]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robotic assist devices for bimanual physical therapy: preliminary experiments , 1993 .

[9]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[10]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? , 1996, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[11]  R. Nudo,et al.  Neural Substrates for the Effects of Rehabilitative Training on Motor Recovery After Ischemic Infarct , 1996, Science.

[12]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[13]  A. M. Pettersen,et al.  Subjective well-being one year after stroke , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  I. Robertson,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[15]  S. Harris,et al.  Single-subject research in rehabilitation: a review of studies using AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline, and alternating treatments designs. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[17]  Nadina B. Lincoln,et al.  Reliability and Revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients , 1998 .

[18]  Kenneth J. Ottenbacher,et al.  COMPARISON OF VISUAL INSPECTION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SINGLE‐SUBJECT DATA IN REHABILITATION RESEARCH , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[19]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  W. Rymer,et al.  Guidance-based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: a pilot study. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  W. Rymer,et al.  Mechatronic assessment of arm impairment after chronic brain injury. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[22]  C. Burgar,et al.  Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  C Ballinger,et al.  Unpacking the black box of therapy – a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years , 1999, Neurology.

[25]  H Rodgers,et al.  A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[26]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[27]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[28]  N. Hogan,et al.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Neurology.

[29]  Raymond Tallis,et al.  Physical therapy to improve movement performance and functional ability poststroke. Part 1. Existing evidence. , 2000 .

[30]  Vm Pomeroy,et al.  Physical therapy to improve movement performance and functional ability poststroke. Part 2. A research direction. , 2000 .

[31]  N. Hogan,et al.  Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[33]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  R. Nudo,et al.  Effects of Repetitive Motor Training on Movement Representations in Adult Squirrel Monkeys: Role of Use versus Learning , 2000, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[35]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[36]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[37]  W. Rymer,et al.  Effect of robot-assisted and unassisted exercise on functional reaching in chronic hemiparesis , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[38]  S Zhan,et al.  Single subject research designs for disability research , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[39]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[40]  V. Pomeroy,et al.  Restoring Movement and Functional Ability after Stroke , 2002 .

[41]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke , 2003, Neurology.

[42]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[43]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[44]  N. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of Two Techniques of Robot-Aided Upper Limb Exercise Training After Stroke , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[45]  Wayne Dite,et al.  Additional task-related practice improves mobility and upper limb function early after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. , 2004, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[46]  Emma K. Stokes,et al.  Effect of robot-mediated therapy on upper extremity dysfunction post-stroke—a single case study , 2005 .

[47]  Margaret A. Finley,et al.  Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe upper-limb motor impairment. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[48]  Rehabilitation Robotics for the Paretic Arm After Stroke: An Efficacy Review , 2005 .

[49]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[50]  Henning Schmidt,et al.  Machines to support motor rehabilitation after stroke: 10 years of experience in Berlin. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.