Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Medical scientists and public health policy makers are increasingly concerned that the scientific discoveries of the past generation are failing to be translated efficiently into tangible human benefit. This concern has generated several initiatives, including the Clinical Research Roundtable at the Institute of Medicine, which first convened in June 2000. Representatives from a diverse group of stakeholders in the nation's clinical research enterprise have collaborated to address the issues it faces. The context of clinical research is increasingly encumbered by high costs, slow results, lack of funding, regulatory burdens, fragmented infrastructure, incompatible databases, and a shortage of qualified investigators and willing participants. These factors have contributed to 2 major obstacles, or translational blocks: impeding the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical studies and of clinical studies into medical practice and health decision making in systems of care. Considering data from across the entire health care system, it has become clear that these 2 translational blocks can be removed only by the collaborative efforts of multiple system stakeholders. The goal of this article is to articulate the 4 central challenges facing clinical research at present--public participation, information systems, workforce training, and funding; to make recommendations about how they might be addressed by particular stakeholders; and to invite a broader, participatory dialogue with a view to improving the overall performance of the US clinical research enterprise.

[1]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[2]  H. Ten Have,et al.  The Nuremberg Code. , 2020, Law, medicine & health care : a publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine.

[3]  At Your Own Risk , 1993 .

[4]  M. Randolph,et al.  Careers in Clinical Research: Obstacles and Opportunities , 1995 .

[5]  D. Rothman,et al.  The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. , 1995, The Milbank quarterly.

[6]  Blissenbach Hf,et al.  An industry in evolution. , 1995 .

[7]  L A Kian,et al.  Justifying the cost of a computer-based patient record. , 1995, Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association.

[8]  M. Field Health Services Research: Work Force and Educational Issues. , 1995 .

[9]  H. Blissenbach An industry in evolution. , 2018, Medical interface.

[10]  J. Bigger,et al.  Clinical trial enrollers vs. nonenrollers: the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Recruitment and Enrollment Assessment in Clinical Trials (REACT) project. , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[11]  D. Hunninghake,et al.  Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  R. Schrier Ensuring the survival of the clinician‐scientist , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Lay perspectives: advantages for health research , 1998, BMJ.

[14]  The state of research within managed care plans: 1997 survey. , 1998, Health affairs.

[15]  G. Schiff,et al.  Computerized prescribing: building the electronic infrastructure for better medication usage. , 1998, JAMA.

[16]  W. Daley The emerging digital economy , 1998 .

[17]  P. Griner,et al.  Reforming the structure and management of academic medical centers: case studies of ten institutions , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  S. Peters,et al.  Security and confidentiality in an electronic medical record. , 1998, Healthcare information management : journal of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society of the American Hospital Association.

[19]  D. Korn,et al.  The changing landscape for clinical research. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  David Korn,et al.  The changing landscape for clinical research [published erratum appears in Acad Med 1999 Sep;74(9):950] , 1999 .

[21]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[22]  G D Schiff,et al.  Prescribing potassium despite hyperkalemia: medication errors uncovered by linking laboratory and pharmacy information systems. , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[23]  D. F. Phillips IRBs search for answers and support during a time of institutional change. , 2000, JAMA.

[24]  Rebecca Herold,et al.  Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, DHHS. Final rule. , 2001, Federal register.

[25]  M. Naughton,et al.  Involving minority and underrepresented women in clinical trials: the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health. , 2000, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[26]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[27]  A. Norris,et al.  Delivery of health informatics education and training. , 2000, Health libraries review.

[28]  W. McCaskill-Stevens,et al.  Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. , 2000, Annals of epidemiology.

[29]  W. McCaskill-Stevens,et al.  Participation of Minorities in Cancer Research , 2000 .

[30]  T. Ley,et al.  The Physician‐Scientist: Career Issues and Challenges at the Year 2000 , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[31]  H. Varmus,et al.  The National Institutes of Health and clinical research: a progress report , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[32]  Jeremiah H. Sable,et al.  Medical informatics in healthcare organizations: a survey of healthcare information managers , 2000, AMIA.

[33]  W. Crowley,et al.  How Do Academic Health Centers Value and Encourage Clinical Research? , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[34]  J. Pober,et al.  Obstacles facing translational research in academic medical centers , 2001, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[35]  Researchers Say Rules Are Too Restrictive , 2001, Science.

[36]  J. Moskowitz,et al.  Enhancing the Clinical Research Pipeline: Training Approaches for a New Century , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[37]  S. Ruberg,et al.  Paradigm shifts in clinical trials enabled by information technology , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[38]  Examining IRBs: are review boards fulfilling their duties? , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[39]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Status of clinical research in academic health centers: views from the research leadership. , 2001, JAMA.

[40]  C J McDonald,et al.  Data standards in health care. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[41]  T. Liesegang,et al.  Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users' guides to patient care. Guyatt GH,*(1) Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ, Green L, Naylor CD, Wilson MC, Richardson WS for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000;284:1290-1296. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[42]  Shawna L. Mercer,et al.  Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? , 2001, American journal of public health.

[43]  D. Bates,et al.  How can information technology improve patient safety and reduce medication errors in children's health care? , 2001, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[44]  T. Cech,et al.  The Biomedical Research Bottleneck , 2001, Science.

[45]  R. Yetman,et al.  THE CARE PATH NOT TAKEN: THE PARADOX OF UNDERUSED PROVEN TREATMENTS , 2001 .

[46]  Steven Joffe,et al.  Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey , 2001, The Lancet.

[47]  K. B. Johnson Barriers that impede the adoption of pediatric information technology. , 2001, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[48]  K. Alexander,et al.  Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, JAMA.

[49]  Eliot Marshall,et al.  NIH Grantees: Where Have All the Young Ones Gone? , 2002, Science.

[50]  T. Ley,et al.  Removing career obstacles for young physician-scientists -- loan-repayment programs. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  A. Gifford,et al.  Participation in research and access to experimental treatments by HIV-infected patients. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  Y Shahar Medical informatics: between science and engineering, between academia and industry. , 2002, Methods of information in medicine.

[53]  D. Nathan,et al.  Careers in translational clinical research-historical perspectives, future challenges. , 2002, JAMA.

[54]  Betsy L. Humphreys,et al.  Making a Powerful Connection: The Health of the Public and the National Information Infrastructure , 2002 .

[55]  Medical innovation and institutional interdependence. Rethinking university-industry connections.Gelijns AC, ∗ Thier SO. JAMA 2002;287:72–77. , 2002 .

[56]  The Role of Purchasers in the Clinical Research Enterprise , 2002, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[57]  Networks aim to bridge gap between clinical research, medical practice. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[58]  K. Shine,et al.  Health care quality and how to achieve it. , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[59]  Terri Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Priorities for disclosure of the elements of informed consent for research: a comparison between parents and investigators , 2002, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[60]  D. Nathan Educational-debt relief for clinical investigators--a vote of confidence. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[61]  Federal funding for biomedical research: commitment and benefits. , 2002, JAMA.

[62]  L. Hedges,et al.  A Brief History of Research Synthesis , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[63]  George J Annas,et al.  Medical privacy and medical research--judging the new federal regulations. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[64]  K. Cox Informed consent and decision-making: patients' experiences of the process of recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[65]  Medical Innovation and Institutional Interdependence , 2002 .

[66]  R. Wittes,et al.  A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[67]  Ellen Fineout-Overholt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature , 2002 .

[68]  Debt repayment for trainees. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[69]  Alexander Ommaya,et al.  The Role of Purchasers and Payers in the Clinical Research Enterprise , 2002 .

[70]  C. Gross,et al.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[71]  Thomas T. H. Wan,et al.  Integration Mechanisms and Hospital Efficiency in Integrated Health Care Delivery Systems , 2002, Journal of Medical Systems.

[72]  Lawrence O. Gostin,et al.  Health Information: Reconciling Personal Privacy with the Public Good of Human Health , 2004, Health Care Analysis.