Testing the limitations of 2-D companding for strain imaging using phantoms

Companding may be used as a technique for generating low-noise strain images. It involves warping radio-frequency echo fields in two dimensions and at several spatial scales to minimize decorrelation errors in correlation-based displacement estimates. For the appropriate experimental conditions, companding increases the sensitivity and dynamic range of strain images without degrading contrast or spatial resolution significantly. In this paper, we examine the conditions that limit the effectiveness of 2-D local companding through a series of experiments using phantoms with tissue-like acoustic and elasticity properties. We found that strain noise remained relatively unchanged as the applied compression increased to 5% of the phantom height, while target contrast increased in proportion to the compression. Controlling the image noise at high compressions improves target visibility over the broad range induced in elastically heterogeneous media, such as biological tissues. Compressions greater than 5% introduce large strains and complex motions that reduce the effectiveness of companding. Control of boundary conditions and ultrasonic data sampling rates is critical for a successful implementation of our algorithms.

[1]  I Céspedes,et al.  Reduction of image noise in elastography. , 1993, Ultrasonic imaging.

[2]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[3]  T. Hall,et al.  2-D companding for noise reduction in strain imaging , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Harvey F. Silverman,et al.  A Class of Algorithms for Fast Digital Image Registration , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  S Y Emelianov,et al.  Elasticity imaging for early detection of renal pathology. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  I Céspedes,et al.  Noise reduction in elastograms using temporal stretching with multicompression averaging. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Phantom materials for elastography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  G G Cox,et al.  Ultrasonic measurement of glomerular diameters in normal adult humans. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  M. Bilgen,et al.  Error analysis in acoustic elastography. I. Displacement estimation. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Ross,et al.  Average magnitude difference function pitch extractor , 1974 .

[13]  John W. Betz Effects of uncompensated relative time companding on a broad-band cross correlator , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[14]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: Elasticity Imaging Using Ultrasound with Application to Muscle and Breast in Vivo , 1993, Ultrasonic imaging.

[15]  Jean Meunier,et al.  A Model For Dynamic Texture Analysis In Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms Of The Myocardium , 1987, Other Conferences.

[16]  G. Clifford Carter,et al.  Estimation of time delay in the presence of source or receiver motion , 1977 .

[17]  L.N. Bohs,et al.  A novel method for angle independent ultrasonic imaging of blood flow and tissue motion , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.