A hybrid MCDM approach to assess the sustainability of students’ preferences for university selection

AbstractSelection of the most suitable university among many alternatives is a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. In this paper, an integrated approach which employs analytic network process (ANP) and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) together, is proposed for this problem. By the way, the paper is concerned with criteria influencing student choice in Turkey to establish if there is any need in developing a multi-criteria model for predicting students’ preference for universities. The ANP is used to analyse the structure of the university selection problem and to determine weights of the criteria, and the PROMETHEE method is used to obtain final ranking, and to make a sensitivity analysis by changing the weights for criteria. The results indicate that three factors, future career prospects and opportunities, scholarship and university's social life at the top in the university selection.

[1]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[2]  P. Love,et al.  Factors Influencing the Program Choice of Doctoral Students in Higher Education Administration , 2001 .

[3]  R. P. Mohanty,et al.  A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: A case study , 2005 .

[4]  David K. Holdsworth,et al.  Choice Modeling New Zealand High School Seniors' Preferences for University Education , 2006 .

[5]  Harun Reşit Yazgan,et al.  Selection of dispatching rules in FMS: ANP model based on BOCR with choquet integral , 2010 .

[6]  Maureen Conard,et al.  An Analysis of Academic Reputation as Perceived by Consumers of Higher Education , 2000 .

[7]  Ning-Kuang Chuang,et al.  Demographic Factors Influencing Selection of an Ideal Graduate Institution: A Literature Review with Recommendations for Implementation. , 2010 .

[8]  G. Soutar,et al.  Students’ preferences for university: a conjoint analysis , 2002 .

[9]  D. Canning,et al.  Higher Education and Economic Development in Africa , 2006 .

[10]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  A preventive maintenance decision model based on multicriteria method PROMETHEE II integrated with Bayesian approach , 2010 .

[11]  C. Simões,et al.  Applying to higher education: information sources and choice factors , 2010 .

[12]  Jacquelyn Warwick,et al.  Perceived Risk in College Selection: Differences in Evaluative Criteria Used by Students and Parents , 2004 .

[13]  S. Briggs.  An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland , 2006 .

[14]  Bogdan Sojkin,et al.  Determinants of higher education choices and student satisfaction: the case of Poland , 2012 .

[15]  I Mergias,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: the case of Cyprus. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  V. Eveland,et al.  Marketing Online Degree Programs: How Do Traditional-Residential Programs Compete? , 2007 .

[17]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A new hybrid model for evaluating the working strategies: case study of construction company , 2012 .

[18]  Liv Anne Støren,et al.  Women’s and men’s choice of higher education—what explains the persistent sex segregation in Norway? , 2007 .

[19]  Joy Gordon,et al.  University websites and dialogic features for building relationships with potential students , 2009 .

[20]  M. E. Menon,et al.  Rationality, Information Search and Choice in Higher Education: Evidence from Greece , 2007 .

[21]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[22]  T. Saaty,et al.  Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks , 1986 .

[23]  Badri Munir Sukoco,et al.  An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for supplier selection with bundling problem , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  S. Briggs,et al.  Which university? A study of the influence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice , 2007 .

[25]  Srivatsa Seshadri,et al.  Differences in College Choice Criteria Between Deciding Students and Their Parents , 2000 .

[26]  Cleopatra Veloutsou,et al.  University selection: information requirements and importance , 2004 .

[27]  De-Li Yang,et al.  Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[28]  H. Christie.  Higher Education and Spatial (Im)Mobility: Nontraditional Students and Living at Home , 2007 .

[29]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning , 1990 .

[30]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Strategic Enrolment Management: Improving Student Satisfaction and Success in Portugal. , 2008 .

[31]  Andrea M. Pampaloni.  The influence of organizational image on college selection: what students seek in institutions of higher education , 2010 .

[32]  Yi Peng,et al.  Improved AHP-group decision making for investment strategy selection , 2012 .

[33]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[34]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  D. Vrontis,et al.  A contemporary higher education student-choice model for developed countries , 2007 .

[36]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach , 1999 .

[37]  Huan-Jyh Shyur,et al.  COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[38]  Akbar Esfahanipour,et al.  Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[40]  Wen-Tzu Lin,et al.  Earthquake‐induced landslide hazard monitoring and assessment using SOM and PROMETHEE techniques: A case study at the Chiufenershan area in Central Taiwan , 2008, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[41]  Serhat Burmaoglu,et al.  A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  V. Senthil,et al.  Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP , 2011 .

[43]  Adrien Presley,et al.  R&D project selection using the analytic network process , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[44]  M. Goumas,et al.  An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis - A case study for a textile firm , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[46]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[47]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  Location choice for direct foreign investment in new hospitals in China by using ANP and TOPSIS , 2010 .

[48]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[49]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[50]  Irem Ozkarahan,et al.  An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[51]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  Quality function deployment for the good of soccer , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  Ergün Eraslan,et al.  Priority determination in strategic energy policies in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision making , 2008 .

[53]  Donald F. Westerheijden,et al.  Disseminating the right information to the right audience: cultural determinants in the use (and misuse) of rankings , 2008 .