Shared sex hormone metabolism-related gene prognostic index between breast and endometrial cancers

Aims As sex hormone-dependent tumors, it remains to be clarified whether there is a common genetic signature and its value between breast and endometrial cancers. The aim of this study was to establish the shared sex hormone metabolism-related gene prognostic index (SHMRGPI) between breast and endometrial cancers and to analyze its potential role in the therapeutic and prognostic assessment of endometrial cancers. Methods Using transcriptome data from TCGA, tumor-associated gene modules were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis, and the intersection of module genes with female sex hormone synthesis and metabolism genes was defined as sex hormone metabolism-related gene. SHMRGPI was established by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and Cox regression. Its prognostic value of patients with endometrial cancer was validated, and a nomogram was constructed. We further investigated the relationship between SHMRGPI groups and clinicopathological features, immune infiltration, tumor mutation burden, and drug sensitivity. Results A total of 8 sex hormone metabolism-related gene were identified as key genes for the construction of prognostic models. Based on SHMRGPI, endometrial cancer patients were divided into high and low SHMRGPI groups. Patients in the low SHMRGPI group had longer overall survival (OS) compared with the high group (P< 0.05). Furthermore, we revealed significant differences between SHMRGPI groups as regards tumor immune cell infiltration, somatic mutation, microsatellite instability and drug sensitivity. Patients with low SHMRGPI may be the beneficiaries of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Conclusions The SHMRGPI established in this study has prognostic power and may be used to screen patients with endometrial cancer who may benefit from immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

[1]  C. Relton,et al.  Sex steroid hormones and risk of breast cancer: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study , 2022, Breast Cancer Research.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2022 , 2022, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  L. Fong,et al.  Cytotoxic CD4+ T cells in cancer: Expanding the immune effector toolbox , 2021, Immunity.

[4]  A. Oza,et al.  Maintenance olaparib for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation (SOLO1/GOG 3004): 5-year follow-up of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  Takayoshi Suzuki,et al.  KDM1A inhibition augments the efficacy of rapamycin for the treatment of endometrial cancer. , 2021, Cancer letters.

[6]  S. Chandarlapaty,et al.  Adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 genetic inheritance and risk of estrogen-driven postmenopausal breast cancer , 2021, JCI insight.

[7]  Robert F. Gruener,et al.  oncoPredict: an R package for predicting in vivo or cancer patient drug response and biomarkers from cell line screening data , 2021, Briefings Bioinform..

[8]  C. Denkert,et al.  Breast cancer , 2021, The Lancet.

[9]  Wenjian Ma,et al.  Estrogen enhances the cytotoxicity of PARP inhibitors on breast cancer cells through stimulating nitric oxide production , 2021, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[10]  Jian Zhang,et al.  The Dual Roles of Human γδ T Cells: Anti-Tumor or Tumor-Promoting , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[11]  Y. Bang,et al.  Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Sandip K. Mishra,et al.  NEDDylation negatively regulates ERRβ expression to promote breast cancer tumorigenesis and progression , 2020, Cell Death & Disease.

[13]  J. Kolesar,et al.  Histone Demethylase KDM5B as a Therapeutic Target for Cancer Therapy , 2020, Cancers.

[14]  S. Pignata,et al.  PARP Inhibitors in Endometrial Cancer: Current Status and Perspectives , 2020, Cancer management and research.

[15]  G. Dittmar,et al.  Prognostic Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[16]  Angela N. Brooks,et al.  Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  M. Sherman,et al.  Progesterone and breast cancer. , 2020, Endocrine reviews.

[18]  L. Diaz,et al.  Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Noncolorectal High Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancer: Results From the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Guochao Liao,et al.  LSD1/KDM1A inhibitors in clinical trials: advances and prospects , 2019, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[20]  Hongbo Wang,et al.  UBE2C Is Upregulated by Estrogen and Promotes Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition via p53 in Endometrial Cancer , 2019, Molecular Cancer Research.

[21]  G. Fleming,et al.  Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer , 2019, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[22]  M. Adank,et al.  Breast cancer risk in transgender people receiving hormone treatment: nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands , 2019, BMJ.

[23]  Kristofer C. Berrett,et al.  ETV4 is necessary for estrogen signaling and growth in endometrial cancer cells , 2019, bioRxiv.

[24]  X. Liu,et al.  Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[25]  S. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Arylsulfatase B is reduced in prostate cancer recurrences. , 2017, Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers.

[26]  A. Abdel-Magid Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) Inhibitors as Potential Treatment for Different Types of Cancers. , 2017, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[27]  H. Rugo,et al.  Safety and Antitumor Activity of Pembrolizumab in Advanced Programmed Death Ligand 1-Positive Endometrial Cancer: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  J. Mesirov,et al.  The Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark Gene Set Collection , 2015 .

[29]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma , 2013, Nature.

[30]  Sridhar Ramaswamy,et al.  Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  E. Maser,et al.  AKR1C3 as a potential target for the inhibitory effect of dietary flavonoids. , 2009, Chemico-biological interactions.

[32]  S. Horvath,et al.  WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[33]  Patrick Neven,et al.  Endometrial cancer. , 2005, Lancet.